【住院期间护理并发症患者安全指标分析】。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
F.M. Escandell Rico , L. Pérez Fernández
{"title":"【住院期间护理并发症患者安全指标分析】。","authors":"F.M. Escandell Rico ,&nbsp;L. Pérez Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To Analyze AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) obtained through the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) in improving patient safety.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Observational descriptive and retroprective study. The CMBD hospital discharge registry of 342 hospitals of the National Health System was included. The MBDS indicators and analysis axes were from 2021 and the hospitalization MBDS information included the following general data: total discharges, average stay, average age and % mortality. Four patient safety indicators were analyzed: Pressure ulcers (PSI 03), Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PSI 06), Accidental puncture or tear in adults (PSI 15) and CVC-related to bloodstream infection (PSI 07).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories not only have a higher number of discharges, but also a longer average stay and mortality. In comparison, PSI 03 and PSI 15 categories show a much lower number of discharges, and a lower mortality and average stay. Conditions associated with PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories could be more severe or complex, leading to a longer hospital stay and a higher risk of mortality. According to relative risk analyses, all indicators show a slightly higher mortality risk in men than in women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Advanced age and serious diagnoses, such as circulatory diseases or neoplasia, are associated with higher mortality and hospital stay. In relation to hospital size, smaller ones show higher risks and worse mortality outcomes. Therefore, these results could guide strategies to optimize resources and focus interventions on the most vulnerable groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":"40 3","pages":"Article 101116"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis de los indicadores de seguridad del paciente en las complicaciones por cuidados durante la hospitalización\",\"authors\":\"F.M. Escandell Rico ,&nbsp;L. Pérez Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2025.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To Analyze AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) obtained through the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) in improving patient safety.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Observational descriptive and retroprective study. The CMBD hospital discharge registry of 342 hospitals of the National Health System was included. The MBDS indicators and analysis axes were from 2021 and the hospitalization MBDS information included the following general data: total discharges, average stay, average age and % mortality. Four patient safety indicators were analyzed: Pressure ulcers (PSI 03), Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PSI 06), Accidental puncture or tear in adults (PSI 15) and CVC-related to bloodstream infection (PSI 07).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories not only have a higher number of discharges, but also a longer average stay and mortality. In comparison, PSI 03 and PSI 15 categories show a much lower number of discharges, and a lower mortality and average stay. Conditions associated with PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories could be more severe or complex, leading to a longer hospital stay and a higher risk of mortality. According to relative risk analyses, all indicators show a slightly higher mortality risk in men than in women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Advanced age and serious diagnoses, such as circulatory diseases or neoplasia, are associated with higher mortality and hospital stay. In relation to hospital size, smaller ones show higher risks and worse mortality outcomes. Therefore, these results could guide strategies to optimize resources and focus interventions on the most vulnerable groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647925000211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析通过最低基本数据集(MBDS)获得的 AHRQ 患者安全指标(PSI)在改善患者安全方面的作用:观察性描述和追溯研究。方法:观察性描述和回顾性研究。研究对象包括全国卫生系统 342 家医院的 CMBD 出院登记。MBDS指标和分析轴来自2021年,住院MBDS信息包括以下一般数据:出院总人数、平均住院日、平均年龄和死亡率。对四项患者安全指标进行了分析:压疮(PSI 03)、先天性气胸(PSI 06)、成人意外穿刺或撕裂(PSI 15)和CVC相关血流感染(PSI 07):结果:PSI 06 和 PSI 07 类别不仅出院人数较多,而且平均住院时间和死亡率也较长。相比之下,PSI 03 和 PSI 15 类别的出院人数要少得多,死亡率和平均住院时间也较短。与 PSI 06 和 PSI 07 类别相关的情况可能更加严重或复杂,导致住院时间更长,死亡风险更高。根据相对风险分析,所有指标均显示男性的死亡风险略高于女性:结论:高龄和严重诊断(如循环系统疾病或肿瘤)与较高的死亡率和住院时间有关。就医院规模而言,规模较小的医院风险较高,死亡率较低。因此,这些结果可以指导优化资源的战略,并将干预重点放在最脆弱的群体上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Análisis de los indicadores de seguridad del paciente en las complicaciones por cuidados durante la hospitalización

Objective

To Analyze AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSI) obtained through the Minimum Basic Data Set (MBDS) in improving patient safety.

Method

Observational descriptive and retroprective study. The CMBD hospital discharge registry of 342 hospitals of the National Health System was included. The MBDS indicators and analysis axes were from 2021 and the hospitalization MBDS information included the following general data: total discharges, average stay, average age and % mortality. Four patient safety indicators were analyzed: Pressure ulcers (PSI 03), Iatrogenic pneumothorax (PSI 06), Accidental puncture or tear in adults (PSI 15) and CVC-related to bloodstream infection (PSI 07).

Results

The PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories not only have a higher number of discharges, but also a longer average stay and mortality. In comparison, PSI 03 and PSI 15 categories show a much lower number of discharges, and a lower mortality and average stay. Conditions associated with PSI 06 and PSI 07 categories could be more severe or complex, leading to a longer hospital stay and a higher risk of mortality. According to relative risk analyses, all indicators show a slightly higher mortality risk in men than in women.

Conclusions

Advanced age and serious diagnoses, such as circulatory diseases or neoplasia, are associated with higher mortality and hospital stay. In relation to hospital size, smaller ones show higher risks and worse mortality outcomes. Therefore, these results could guide strategies to optimize resources and focus interventions on the most vulnerable groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信