IPEM 专题报告:直列加速器制造商综合质量控制使用指南。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Michael Pearson, Michael P Barnes, Kirstie F Brown, Richard Delany, Simon W Stevens, Rakesh Kizhakke Veetil, Steven Weston, J R Whitbourn
{"title":"IPEM 专题报告:直列加速器制造商综合质量控制使用指南。","authors":"Michael Pearson, Michael P Barnes, Kirstie F Brown, Richard Delany, Simon W Stevens, Rakesh Kizhakke Veetil, Steven Weston, J R Whitbourn","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adc8f7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This report provides guidance for users of linear accelerator (linac) manufacturer integrated quality control (MIQC) tools. MIQC tools have been developed and introduced by radiotherapy linac vendors, and have the potential to improve both the quality and efficiency of linac quality control (QC). They usually utilise the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), but may acquire data from other sources, and automatically perform and analyse tests of various treatment machine QC parameters. The currently available systems meeting this definition are Varian machine performance check, CyberKnife automated quality assurance /end-to-end, TomoTherapy Quality Assurance, and Elekta machine QA (also known as AQUA). This guidance report covers the commissioning and implementation of MIQC. The guidance has been developed by a radiotherapy special interest group working party on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommendations within the report are derived from the experience of the working party members, existing guidance, literature, and a United Kingdom survey conducted in 2022 (Pearson<i>et al</i>2023<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>68</b>245018). Topics covered include developing an understanding of the QC system, independence review of MIQC, commissioning, implementation, ongoing QC and calibration, software upgrades and periodic review. The commissioning section covers detector commissioning, repeatability and reproducibility, baseline and tolerance setting, concordance with existing QC, sensitivity testing, cost-benefits analysis, and risk assessment methods. In order to offer practical guidance, case studies covering each aspect of commissioning are included. They are real-world examples or experiences from early adopters, each applied to a different example MIQC system. The examples will be directly applicable to users of that specific MIQC system, but also provide practical guidance on clinical implementation to users of the other systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IPEM topical report: guidance for the use of linac manufacturer integrated quality control.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Pearson, Michael P Barnes, Kirstie F Brown, Richard Delany, Simon W Stevens, Rakesh Kizhakke Veetil, Steven Weston, J R Whitbourn\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/adc8f7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This report provides guidance for users of linear accelerator (linac) manufacturer integrated quality control (MIQC) tools. MIQC tools have been developed and introduced by radiotherapy linac vendors, and have the potential to improve both the quality and efficiency of linac quality control (QC). They usually utilise the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), but may acquire data from other sources, and automatically perform and analyse tests of various treatment machine QC parameters. The currently available systems meeting this definition are Varian machine performance check, CyberKnife automated quality assurance /end-to-end, TomoTherapy Quality Assurance, and Elekta machine QA (also known as AQUA). This guidance report covers the commissioning and implementation of MIQC. The guidance has been developed by a radiotherapy special interest group working party on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommendations within the report are derived from the experience of the working party members, existing guidance, literature, and a United Kingdom survey conducted in 2022 (Pearson<i>et al</i>2023<i>Phys. Med. Biol.</i><b>68</b>245018). Topics covered include developing an understanding of the QC system, independence review of MIQC, commissioning, implementation, ongoing QC and calibration, software upgrades and periodic review. The commissioning section covers detector commissioning, repeatability and reproducibility, baseline and tolerance setting, concordance with existing QC, sensitivity testing, cost-benefits analysis, and risk assessment methods. In order to offer practical guidance, case studies covering each aspect of commissioning are included. They are real-world examples or experiences from early adopters, each applied to a different example MIQC system. The examples will be directly applicable to users of that specific MIQC system, but also provide practical guidance on clinical implementation to users of the other systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc8f7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adc8f7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本报告为直线加速器(直线加速器)制造商集成质量控制(MIQC)工具的用户提供指导。放射治疗直线加速器供应商已经开发并引入了MIQC工具,并且有可能提高直线加速器质量控制(QC)的质量和效率。他们通常使用电子传送门成像设备(EPID),但也可以从其他来源获取数据,并自动执行和分析各种处理机QC参数的测试。目前符合这一定义的可用系统有瓦里安机器性能检查(MPC)、射波刀自动化质量保证(AQA)/端到端(E2E)、TomoTherapy质量保证(TQA)和Elekta机器质量保证(EMQA)(也称为AQUA)。本指导报告涵盖了MIQC的调试和实施。该指南由放射治疗特别兴趣小组(RTSIG)工作组代表医学物理与工程研究所(IPEM)制定。报告中的建议来自工作组成员的经验、现有指南、文献和2022年进行的英国调查(Pearson et al 2023)。涵盖的主题包括对质量控制系统的理解,MIQC的独立审查,调试,实施,持续的质量控制和校准,软件升级和定期审查。调试部分包括检测器调试、可重复性和再现性、基线和容差设置、与现有QC的一致性、灵敏度测试、成本效益分析和风险评估方法。为了提供实用的指导,案例研究涵盖了调试的各个方面。它们是来自早期采用者的真实示例或经验,每个示例都应用于不同的MIQC系统示例。示例将直接适用于该特定MIQC系统的用户,但也为其他系统的用户提供临床实施的实用指导。 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
IPEM topical report: guidance for the use of linac manufacturer integrated quality control.

This report provides guidance for users of linear accelerator (linac) manufacturer integrated quality control (MIQC) tools. MIQC tools have been developed and introduced by radiotherapy linac vendors, and have the potential to improve both the quality and efficiency of linac quality control (QC). They usually utilise the Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID), but may acquire data from other sources, and automatically perform and analyse tests of various treatment machine QC parameters. The currently available systems meeting this definition are Varian machine performance check, CyberKnife automated quality assurance /end-to-end, TomoTherapy Quality Assurance, and Elekta machine QA (also known as AQUA). This guidance report covers the commissioning and implementation of MIQC. The guidance has been developed by a radiotherapy special interest group working party on behalf of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. Recommendations within the report are derived from the experience of the working party members, existing guidance, literature, and a United Kingdom survey conducted in 2022 (Pearsonet al2023Phys. Med. Biol.68245018). Topics covered include developing an understanding of the QC system, independence review of MIQC, commissioning, implementation, ongoing QC and calibration, software upgrades and periodic review. The commissioning section covers detector commissioning, repeatability and reproducibility, baseline and tolerance setting, concordance with existing QC, sensitivity testing, cost-benefits analysis, and risk assessment methods. In order to offer practical guidance, case studies covering each aspect of commissioning are included. They are real-world examples or experiences from early adopters, each applied to a different example MIQC system. The examples will be directly applicable to users of that specific MIQC system, but also provide practical guidance on clinical implementation to users of the other systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics in medicine and biology
Physics in medicine and biology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
409
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信