人工智能检测患者-呼吸机不同步。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Abdulhakim Tlimat, Cosmo Fowler, Sami Safadi, Robert B Johnson, Sandeep Bodduluri, Peter Morris, Surya P Bhatt
{"title":"人工智能检测患者-呼吸机不同步。","authors":"Abdulhakim Tlimat, Cosmo Fowler, Sami Safadi, Robert B Johnson, Sandeep Bodduluri, Peter Morris, Surya P Bhatt","doi":"10.1089/respcare.12540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a challenge to invasive mechanical ventilation characterized by misalignment of ventilatory support and patient respiratory effort. PVA is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased work of breathing, oxygen consumption, and risk of barotrauma. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially transformative solution offering capabilities for automated detection of PVA. This narrative review characterizes the landscape of AI models designed for PVA detection and quantification. A comprehensive literature search identified 13 studies, spanning diverse settings and patient populations. Machine learning (ML) techniques, derivation datasets, types of asynchronies detected, and performance metrics were assessed to provide a contemporary view of AI in this domain. We reviewed 166 articles published between 1989 and April 2024, of which 13 were included, encompassing 332 participants and analyzing >5.8 million breaths. Patient counts ranged between 8 and 107 and breath data ranged between 1,375 and 4.2 M. The reason for invasive mechanical ventilation use was given as ARDS in three articles, whereas the remainder had different invasive mechanical ventilation indications. Various ML methods as well as newer deep learning techniques were used to address PVA types. Sensitivity and specificity of 10 of the 13 models were >0.9, and 8 models reported accuracy of >0.9. AI models have significant potential to address PVA in invasive mechanical ventilation, displaying high accuracy across various populations and asynchrony types. This showcases their potential to accurately detect and quantify PVA. Future work should focus on model validation in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony.\",\"authors\":\"Abdulhakim Tlimat, Cosmo Fowler, Sami Safadi, Robert B Johnson, Sandeep Bodduluri, Peter Morris, Surya P Bhatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/respcare.12540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a challenge to invasive mechanical ventilation characterized by misalignment of ventilatory support and patient respiratory effort. PVA is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased work of breathing, oxygen consumption, and risk of barotrauma. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially transformative solution offering capabilities for automated detection of PVA. This narrative review characterizes the landscape of AI models designed for PVA detection and quantification. A comprehensive literature search identified 13 studies, spanning diverse settings and patient populations. Machine learning (ML) techniques, derivation datasets, types of asynchronies detected, and performance metrics were assessed to provide a contemporary view of AI in this domain. We reviewed 166 articles published between 1989 and April 2024, of which 13 were included, encompassing 332 participants and analyzing >5.8 million breaths. Patient counts ranged between 8 and 107 and breath data ranged between 1,375 and 4.2 M. The reason for invasive mechanical ventilation use was given as ARDS in three articles, whereas the remainder had different invasive mechanical ventilation indications. Various ML methods as well as newer deep learning techniques were used to address PVA types. Sensitivity and specificity of 10 of the 13 models were >0.9, and 8 models reported accuracy of >0.9. AI models have significant potential to address PVA in invasive mechanical ventilation, displaying high accuracy across various populations and asynchrony types. This showcases their potential to accurately detect and quantify PVA. Future work should focus on model validation in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12540\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12540","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)是对有创机械通气的挑战,其特征是通气支持与患者呼吸努力不一致。PVA非常普遍,并与不良临床结果相关,包括呼吸功增加、耗氧量增加和气压创伤的风险。人工智能(AI)是一种潜在的变革性解决方案,提供了自动检测PVA的能力。本文叙述了为PVA检测和量化而设计的人工智能模型的特点。全面的文献检索确定了13项研究,涵盖了不同的环境和患者群体。评估了机器学习(ML)技术、派生数据集、检测到的异步类型和性能指标,以提供该领域人工智能的当代观点。我们回顾了1989年至2024年4月期间发表的166篇文章,其中包括13篇,涉及332名参与者,分析了bb580万次呼吸。患者计数范围在8 - 107之间,呼吸数据范围在1375 - 4.2 m之间。有创机械通气使用的原因在3篇文章中被称为ARDS,而其余的有创机械通气指征不同。各种ML方法以及较新的深度学习技术被用于解决PVA类型。13个模型中有10个模型的敏感性和特异性为>0.9,8个模型的准确性为>0.9。人工智能模型在解决有创机械通气中的PVA方面具有巨大的潜力,在各种人群和异步类型中都显示出很高的准确性。这显示了它们在准确检测和量化PVA方面的潜力。未来的工作应该集中在不同的临床环境和患者群体的模型验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence for the Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony.

Patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) is a challenge to invasive mechanical ventilation characterized by misalignment of ventilatory support and patient respiratory effort. PVA is highly prevalent and associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including increased work of breathing, oxygen consumption, and risk of barotrauma. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a potentially transformative solution offering capabilities for automated detection of PVA. This narrative review characterizes the landscape of AI models designed for PVA detection and quantification. A comprehensive literature search identified 13 studies, spanning diverse settings and patient populations. Machine learning (ML) techniques, derivation datasets, types of asynchronies detected, and performance metrics were assessed to provide a contemporary view of AI in this domain. We reviewed 166 articles published between 1989 and April 2024, of which 13 were included, encompassing 332 participants and analyzing >5.8 million breaths. Patient counts ranged between 8 and 107 and breath data ranged between 1,375 and 4.2 M. The reason for invasive mechanical ventilation use was given as ARDS in three articles, whereas the remainder had different invasive mechanical ventilation indications. Various ML methods as well as newer deep learning techniques were used to address PVA types. Sensitivity and specificity of 10 of the 13 models were >0.9, and 8 models reported accuracy of >0.9. AI models have significant potential to address PVA in invasive mechanical ventilation, displaying high accuracy across various populations and asynchrony types. This showcases their potential to accurately detect and quantify PVA. Future work should focus on model validation in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信