Doriann M Alcaide, Nigel Blackwood, Rodney Arthur, David A Patch, Robert W Rutz, Clay A Spitler
{"title":"rfn -先进逆行股骨钉系统(RFNA)治疗股骨骨折的远端互锁回退:近期结果分析。","authors":"Doriann M Alcaide, Nigel Blackwood, Rodney Arthur, David A Patch, Robert W Rutz, Clay A Spitler","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine rate of distal screw backout in patients treated with the DePuy Synthes Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced (RFNA) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level I Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adults with type 32 and 33 AO/OTA femur fractures that underwent fixation between 2021 and 2024 with the RFNA. Patients were included only if they had healed fractures or demonstrated distal screw backout regardless of follow up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Demographics, injury characteristics, fixation construct, complications such as rates of reoperation, interlock fracture, implant removal, distal screw backout ≥ 5mm and reoperation to promote bone healing were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with and without distal screw backout ≥ 5mm were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients underwent fixation with RFNA for femur fractures. The mean patient age was of 40.4 (18-83), 62.4% were males, and mean BMI was 29.2. The average follow up was 281 days (27-1041 days). Motor vehicle accident was the most common mechanism of injury(48.5%). Fractures consisted of 77.2% AO/OTA type 32 and 22.8% type 33. Nine cases (8.9%) had screw backout (mean 15.5mm (5-31mm)). Among these 55.6% were OTA/AO 32 and 44.4% were OTA/AO 33.No cases had multiple screws backout. The mean time for diagnosis of screw backout was 73.3 days (25-180 days). Five of nine cases with backout underwent a reoperation for screw removal due to symptomatic prominence. There was a 5.0% reoperation rate to promote bone healing, a 5.0% surgical site infection rate, and a 3.0% interlock fracture rate. Excluding patients with supplemental fixation, 4 patients (5.7%) had distal screw backout with 2 undergoing removal of screw and all achieving union. No significant differences in age (37.5 vs 35.6; p=0.821), BMI (31.5 vs 29.4; p=0.607), weight bearing status (WBAT 75% vs 66.7%;p=0.134) or distance from fracture to screw (121 mm vs 132 mm; p=0.804) were observed between patients with and without backout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When used for treating distal femoral and femoral shaft fractures, the Depuy Synthes RFNA showed a 8.9% rate for distal interlock screw backout ≥ 5mm and a 5% reoperation rate for removal of distal screw backout.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal Interlock Backout in the RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System (RFNA) in Femur Fractures: Short Term Outcome Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Doriann M Alcaide, Nigel Blackwood, Rodney Arthur, David A Patch, Robert W Rutz, Clay A Spitler\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine rate of distal screw backout in patients treated with the DePuy Synthes Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced (RFNA) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level I Trauma Center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>Adults with type 32 and 33 AO/OTA femur fractures that underwent fixation between 2021 and 2024 with the RFNA. Patients were included only if they had healed fractures or demonstrated distal screw backout regardless of follow up.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Demographics, injury characteristics, fixation construct, complications such as rates of reoperation, interlock fracture, implant removal, distal screw backout ≥ 5mm and reoperation to promote bone healing were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with and without distal screw backout ≥ 5mm were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients underwent fixation with RFNA for femur fractures. The mean patient age was of 40.4 (18-83), 62.4% were males, and mean BMI was 29.2. The average follow up was 281 days (27-1041 days). Motor vehicle accident was the most common mechanism of injury(48.5%). Fractures consisted of 77.2% AO/OTA type 32 and 22.8% type 33. Nine cases (8.9%) had screw backout (mean 15.5mm (5-31mm)). Among these 55.6% were OTA/AO 32 and 44.4% were OTA/AO 33.No cases had multiple screws backout. The mean time for diagnosis of screw backout was 73.3 days (25-180 days). Five of nine cases with backout underwent a reoperation for screw removal due to symptomatic prominence. There was a 5.0% reoperation rate to promote bone healing, a 5.0% surgical site infection rate, and a 3.0% interlock fracture rate. Excluding patients with supplemental fixation, 4 patients (5.7%) had distal screw backout with 2 undergoing removal of screw and all achieving union. No significant differences in age (37.5 vs 35.6; p=0.821), BMI (31.5 vs 29.4; p=0.607), weight bearing status (WBAT 75% vs 66.7%;p=0.134) or distance from fracture to screw (121 mm vs 132 mm; p=0.804) were observed between patients with and without backout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When used for treating distal femoral and femoral shaft fractures, the Depuy Synthes RFNA showed a 8.9% rate for distal interlock screw backout ≥ 5mm and a 5% reoperation rate for removal of distal screw backout.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002979\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:观察DePuy Synthes逆行股钉高级(RFNA)系统治疗远端螺钉退位的发生率。方法:设计:回顾性。地点:一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:成人32型和33型AO/OTA股骨骨折,在2021年至2024年间接受RFNA固定。无论随访情况如何,只有骨折愈合或表现出远端螺钉后移的患者才被纳入研究。结果测量与比较:分析人口统计学、损伤特征、固定结构、并发症(如再手术率、联锁骨折率、内固定物取出率、远端螺钉退位≥5mm、再手术促进骨愈合率)。比较螺钉远端后退≥5mm与不后退≥5mm患者的特征。结果:101例患者接受了RFNA固定治疗股骨骨折。患者平均年龄40.4岁(18-83岁),男性占62.4%,平均BMI为29.2。平均随访281天(27 ~ 1041天)。机动车事故是最常见的伤害机制(48.5%)。AO/OTA 32型占77.2%,33型占22.8%。9例(8.9%)出现螺钉回退,平均15.5mm (5 ~ 31mm)。其中OTA/AO 32占55.6%,OTA/AO 33占44.4%。没有病例有多个螺钉回退。诊断螺钉后撤的平均时间为73.3天(25 ~ 180天)。9例内翻患者中有5例因症状突出而再次手术取螺钉。再次手术促进骨愈合率为5.0%,手术部位感染率为5.0%,联锁骨折率为3.0%。排除辅助固定的患者,4例(5.7%)患者发生远端螺钉后移,2例进行螺钉取出,全部愈合。年龄无显著差异(37.5 vs 35.6;p=0.821), BMI (31.5 vs 29.4;p=0.607)、负重状态(WBAT 75% vs 66.7%;p=0.134)或骨折距螺钉距离(121 mm vs 132 mm;P =0.804)。结论:Depuy Synthes RFNA用于治疗股骨远端和股骨干骨折时,远端联锁螺钉后撤≥5mm的发生率为8.9%,远端螺钉后撤去除的再手术率为5%。
Distal Interlock Backout in the RFN-Advanced Retrograde Femoral Nailing System (RFNA) in Femur Fractures: Short Term Outcome Analysis.
Objective: To examine rate of distal screw backout in patients treated with the DePuy Synthes Retrograde Femoral Nail Advanced (RFNA) system.
Methods: Design: Retrospective.
Setting: Single Level I Trauma Center.
Patient selection criteria: Adults with type 32 and 33 AO/OTA femur fractures that underwent fixation between 2021 and 2024 with the RFNA. Patients were included only if they had healed fractures or demonstrated distal screw backout regardless of follow up.
Outcome measures and comparisons: Demographics, injury characteristics, fixation construct, complications such as rates of reoperation, interlock fracture, implant removal, distal screw backout ≥ 5mm and reoperation to promote bone healing were analyzed. Characteristics of patients with and without distal screw backout ≥ 5mm were compared.
Results: A total of 101 patients underwent fixation with RFNA for femur fractures. The mean patient age was of 40.4 (18-83), 62.4% were males, and mean BMI was 29.2. The average follow up was 281 days (27-1041 days). Motor vehicle accident was the most common mechanism of injury(48.5%). Fractures consisted of 77.2% AO/OTA type 32 and 22.8% type 33. Nine cases (8.9%) had screw backout (mean 15.5mm (5-31mm)). Among these 55.6% were OTA/AO 32 and 44.4% were OTA/AO 33.No cases had multiple screws backout. The mean time for diagnosis of screw backout was 73.3 days (25-180 days). Five of nine cases with backout underwent a reoperation for screw removal due to symptomatic prominence. There was a 5.0% reoperation rate to promote bone healing, a 5.0% surgical site infection rate, and a 3.0% interlock fracture rate. Excluding patients with supplemental fixation, 4 patients (5.7%) had distal screw backout with 2 undergoing removal of screw and all achieving union. No significant differences in age (37.5 vs 35.6; p=0.821), BMI (31.5 vs 29.4; p=0.607), weight bearing status (WBAT 75% vs 66.7%;p=0.134) or distance from fracture to screw (121 mm vs 132 mm; p=0.804) were observed between patients with and without backout.
Conclusion: When used for treating distal femoral and femoral shaft fractures, the Depuy Synthes RFNA showed a 8.9% rate for distal interlock screw backout ≥ 5mm and a 5% reoperation rate for removal of distal screw backout.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.