Xiangmei He, Lan Hou, Jiawei Zhang, Donghui Wang, Liu Yang, Danxi Li, Yuan Qin, Mingkun Zhang, Huan Zhang, Juliang Zhang
{"title":"\"单孔内窥镜乳头/皮肤保留乳房切除术与胸前乳房假体重建术在临床实践中的评估\"。","authors":"Xiangmei He, Lan Hou, Jiawei Zhang, Donghui Wang, Liu Yang, Danxi Li, Yuan Qin, Mingkun Zhang, Huan Zhang, Juliang Zhang","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the clinical outcomes associated with single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2021 to April 2024, patients undergoing single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total pre-pectoral breast implant reconstruction were selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this method and to collect information on patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 patients were enrolled in this study, of which 207 completed follow-up, yielding a follow-up rate of 95.0%. In terms of surgical safety, the occurrence of flap ischemic problems was 7.8%, while the occurrence of flap necrosis was 3.7%. The occurrence of nipple resection during surgery was 7.4%, and among the 191 patients who had their nipples preserved, the occurrence of nipple ischemia was 7.0%. The occurrence of nipple necrosis was 1.5%, that of infection 10.1%, and that of prosthesis removal 3.9%. Approximately 1.0% of patients experienced metastasis and recurrence during the median 14.3 months follow-up period, as demonstrated by the CUSUM learning curve. A cumulative plot analysis indicated that it would require approximately 21 cases for the surgeon to achieve a meaningful reduction in operating time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction is a safe, effective, and visually acceptable surgical technique. While it provides good oncological safety, further evidence is required to fully support its use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Evaluation of Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple/Skin -Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Breast Implant Reconstruction in Clinical Practice\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Xiangmei He, Lan Hou, Jiawei Zhang, Donghui Wang, Liu Yang, Danxi Li, Yuan Qin, Mingkun Zhang, Huan Zhang, Juliang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the clinical outcomes associated with single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2021 to April 2024, patients undergoing single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total pre-pectoral breast implant reconstruction were selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this method and to collect information on patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 218 patients were enrolled in this study, of which 207 completed follow-up, yielding a follow-up rate of 95.0%. In terms of surgical safety, the occurrence of flap ischemic problems was 7.8%, while the occurrence of flap necrosis was 3.7%. The occurrence of nipple resection during surgery was 7.4%, and among the 191 patients who had their nipples preserved, the occurrence of nipple ischemia was 7.0%. The occurrence of nipple necrosis was 1.5%, that of infection 10.1%, and that of prosthesis removal 3.9%. Approximately 1.0% of patients experienced metastasis and recurrence during the median 14.3 months follow-up period, as demonstrated by the CUSUM learning curve. A cumulative plot analysis indicated that it would require approximately 21 cases for the surgeon to achieve a meaningful reduction in operating time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction is a safe, effective, and visually acceptable surgical technique. While it provides good oncological safety, further evidence is required to fully support its use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Evaluation of Single-Port Endoscopic Nipple/Skin -Sparing Mastectomy with Prepectoral Breast Implant Reconstruction in Clinical Practice".
Background: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of the clinical outcomes associated with single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction.
Methods: From April 2021 to April 2024, patients undergoing single-port endoscopic nipple/skin-sparing mastectomy with total pre-pectoral breast implant reconstruction were selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this method and to collect information on patient-reported outcomes.
Results: A total of 218 patients were enrolled in this study, of which 207 completed follow-up, yielding a follow-up rate of 95.0%. In terms of surgical safety, the occurrence of flap ischemic problems was 7.8%, while the occurrence of flap necrosis was 3.7%. The occurrence of nipple resection during surgery was 7.4%, and among the 191 patients who had their nipples preserved, the occurrence of nipple ischemia was 7.0%. The occurrence of nipple necrosis was 1.5%, that of infection 10.1%, and that of prosthesis removal 3.9%. Approximately 1.0% of patients experienced metastasis and recurrence during the median 14.3 months follow-up period, as demonstrated by the CUSUM learning curve. A cumulative plot analysis indicated that it would require approximately 21 cases for the surgeon to achieve a meaningful reduction in operating time.
Conclusion: Single-port endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy with total prepectoral breast implant reconstruction is a safe, effective, and visually acceptable surgical technique. While it provides good oncological safety, further evidence is required to fully support its use.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.