运动捕捉能否改善基于任务的脑卒中后运动功能 fMRI 研究?系统综述。

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Zakaria Belkacemi, Liesjet E H van Dokkum, Andon Tchechmedjiev, Matthieu Lepetit-Coiffe, Denis Mottet, Emmanuelle Le Bars
{"title":"运动捕捉能否改善基于任务的脑卒中后运动功能 fMRI 研究?系统综述。","authors":"Zakaria Belkacemi, Liesjet E H van Dokkum, Andon Tchechmedjiev, Matthieu Lepetit-Coiffe, Denis Mottet, Emmanuelle Le Bars","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01611-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variability in motor recovery after stroke represents a major challenge in its understanding and management. While functional MRI has been used to unravel interactions between stroke motor function and clinical outcome, fMRI alone cannot clarify any relation between brain activation and movement characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to identify fMRI and kinematic coupling approaches and to evaluate their potential contribution to the understanding of motor function post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on studies using fMRI and kinematics in post-stroke individuals. We assessed the internal, external, statistical, and technological validity of each study. Data extraction included study design and analysis procedures used to couple brain activity with movement characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 404 studies found, 23 were included in the final review. The overall study quality was moderate (0.6/1). Thirteen studies used kinematic information either parallel to the fMRI results, or as a real-time input to external devices, for instance to provide feedback to the patient. Ten studies performed a statistical analysis between movement and brain activity by either using kinematics as variables during group or individual level regression or correlation. This permitted establishing links between movement characteristics and brain activity, unraveling cortico-kinematic relationships. For instance, increased activity in the ipsilesional Premotor Cortex was related to less smooth movements, whereas trunk compensation was expressed by increased activity in the contralesional Primary Motor Cortex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review suggests that the coupling of fMRI and kinematics may provide valuable insight into cortico-kinematic relationships. The optimization and standardization of both data measurement and treatment procedures may help the field to move forward and to fully use the potential of multimodal cortico-kinematic integration to unravel the complexity of post-stroke motor function and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"70"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can motion capture improve task-based fMRI studies of motor function post-stroke? A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Zakaria Belkacemi, Liesjet E H van Dokkum, Andon Tchechmedjiev, Matthieu Lepetit-Coiffe, Denis Mottet, Emmanuelle Le Bars\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12984-025-01611-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Variability in motor recovery after stroke represents a major challenge in its understanding and management. While functional MRI has been used to unravel interactions between stroke motor function and clinical outcome, fMRI alone cannot clarify any relation between brain activation and movement characteristics.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to identify fMRI and kinematic coupling approaches and to evaluate their potential contribution to the understanding of motor function post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on studies using fMRI and kinematics in post-stroke individuals. We assessed the internal, external, statistical, and technological validity of each study. Data extraction included study design and analysis procedures used to couple brain activity with movement characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 404 studies found, 23 were included in the final review. The overall study quality was moderate (0.6/1). Thirteen studies used kinematic information either parallel to the fMRI results, or as a real-time input to external devices, for instance to provide feedback to the patient. Ten studies performed a statistical analysis between movement and brain activity by either using kinematics as variables during group or individual level regression or correlation. This permitted establishing links between movement characteristics and brain activity, unraveling cortico-kinematic relationships. For instance, increased activity in the ipsilesional Premotor Cortex was related to less smooth movements, whereas trunk compensation was expressed by increased activity in the contralesional Primary Motor Cortex.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our review suggests that the coupling of fMRI and kinematics may provide valuable insight into cortico-kinematic relationships. The optimization and standardization of both data measurement and treatment procedures may help the field to move forward and to fully use the potential of multimodal cortico-kinematic integration to unravel the complexity of post-stroke motor function and recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966795/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01611-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01611-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑卒中后运动恢复的可变性是对其理解和管理的主要挑战。虽然功能性MRI已被用于揭示中风运动功能与临床结果之间的相互作用,但仅凭功能性MRI无法阐明大脑激活与运动特征之间的任何关系。目的:我们旨在确定功能磁共振成像和运动学耦合方法,并评估它们对理解脑卒中后运动功能的潜在贡献。方法:根据PRISMA指南对脑卒中后个体的功能磁共振成像和运动学研究进行系统的文献综述。我们评估了每项研究的内部、外部、统计和技术有效性。数据提取包括研究设计和分析程序,用于将大脑活动与运动特征相结合。结果:404项研究中,23项纳入最终评审。整体研究质量为中等(0.6/1)。13项研究使用运动学信息或与fMRI结果平行,或作为外部设备的实时输入,例如向患者提供反馈。10项研究在群体或个人水平回归或相关中使用运动学作为变量,对运动和大脑活动进行了统计分析。这允许在运动特征和大脑活动之间建立联系,揭示皮质-运动学关系。例如,同侧运动前皮层的活动增加与不太平稳的运动有关,而躯干代偿则是通过对侧初级运动皮层的活动增加来表达的。结论:我们的综述表明,功能磁共振成像和运动学的耦合可能为皮质-运动学关系提供有价值的见解。数据测量和治疗程序的优化和标准化可能有助于该领域向前发展,并充分利用多模态皮质-运动学整合的潜力来揭示脑卒中后运动功能和恢复的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can motion capture improve task-based fMRI studies of motor function post-stroke? A systematic review.

Background: Variability in motor recovery after stroke represents a major challenge in its understanding and management. While functional MRI has been used to unravel interactions between stroke motor function and clinical outcome, fMRI alone cannot clarify any relation between brain activation and movement characteristics.

Objectives: We aimed to identify fMRI and kinematic coupling approaches and to evaluate their potential contribution to the understanding of motor function post-stroke.

Method: A systematic literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines on studies using fMRI and kinematics in post-stroke individuals. We assessed the internal, external, statistical, and technological validity of each study. Data extraction included study design and analysis procedures used to couple brain activity with movement characteristics.

Results: Of the 404 studies found, 23 were included in the final review. The overall study quality was moderate (0.6/1). Thirteen studies used kinematic information either parallel to the fMRI results, or as a real-time input to external devices, for instance to provide feedback to the patient. Ten studies performed a statistical analysis between movement and brain activity by either using kinematics as variables during group or individual level regression or correlation. This permitted establishing links between movement characteristics and brain activity, unraveling cortico-kinematic relationships. For instance, increased activity in the ipsilesional Premotor Cortex was related to less smooth movements, whereas trunk compensation was expressed by increased activity in the contralesional Primary Motor Cortex.

Conclusion: Our review suggests that the coupling of fMRI and kinematics may provide valuable insight into cortico-kinematic relationships. The optimization and standardization of both data measurement and treatment procedures may help the field to move forward and to fully use the potential of multimodal cortico-kinematic integration to unravel the complexity of post-stroke motor function and recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信