用创新的有效安慰剂解决经典迷幻研究中的致盲问题。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jacob S Aday, Otto Simonsson, Emmanuelle A D Schindler, Deepak Cyril D'Souza
{"title":"用创新的有效安慰剂解决经典迷幻研究中的致盲问题。","authors":"Jacob S Aday, Otto Simonsson, Emmanuelle A D Schindler, Deepak Cyril D'Souza","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Classic psychedelics show promise as a treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, weak blinding integrity in trials has been argued to limit the capacity to definitively attribute therapeutic effects to the classic psychedelic and dose under investigation. This highlights the need to explore alternative active placebos.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the drawbacks of current placebo conditions used in classic psychedelic studies, propose criteria for suitable active placebos, and review interventions that may fit these criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The active placebos that have typically been used in modern-day trials of classic psychedelics may not adequately blind participants, investigators, or raters. Considerations for the characteristics of ideal active placebos in classic psychedelic studies include 1) acute psychoactive effects, 2) acute physiological effects, 3) onset and duration of acute effects, 4) safety, and 5) lack of therapeutic effects in the target disease. Here, we identified several pharmacological agents that may have potential as active placebos in trials involving moderate-to-high doses of certain short-acting and long-acting classic psychedelics, as well as low-dose administration and microdosing regimes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To accurately assess safety and efficacy of classic psychedelics as therapeutic drugs, future research should apply a thoughtful process for selecting active placebos and consider ancillary strategies to improve blinding in trials involving these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing blinding in classic psychedelic studies with innovative active placebos.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob S Aday, Otto Simonsson, Emmanuelle A D Schindler, Deepak Cyril D'Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijnp/pyaf023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Classic psychedelics show promise as a treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, weak blinding integrity in trials has been argued to limit the capacity to definitively attribute therapeutic effects to the classic psychedelic and dose under investigation. This highlights the need to explore alternative active placebos.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to describe the drawbacks of current placebo conditions used in classic psychedelic studies, propose criteria for suitable active placebos, and review interventions that may fit these criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The active placebos that have typically been used in modern-day trials of classic psychedelics may not adequately blind participants, investigators, or raters. Considerations for the characteristics of ideal active placebos in classic psychedelic studies include 1) acute psychoactive effects, 2) acute physiological effects, 3) onset and duration of acute effects, 4) safety, and 5) lack of therapeutic effects in the target disease. Here, we identified several pharmacological agents that may have potential as active placebos in trials involving moderate-to-high doses of certain short-acting and long-acting classic psychedelics, as well as low-dose administration and microdosing regimes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To accurately assess safety and efficacy of classic psychedelics as therapeutic drugs, future research should apply a thoughtful process for selecting active placebos and consider ancillary strategies to improve blinding in trials involving these drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyaf023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理:经典迷幻药有望治疗各种神经精神疾病。然而,有人认为,试验中的弱盲性完整性限制了将治疗效果明确归因于所研究的经典迷幻剂和剂量的能力。这凸显了探索其他有效安慰剂的必要性。目的:我们旨在描述经典迷幻研究中使用的安慰剂条件的缺点,提出合适的活性安慰剂标准,并回顾可能符合这些标准的干预措施。结果:在经典迷幻药的现代试验中,通常使用的活性安慰剂可能不足以使参与者、研究者或评分者失明。在经典的迷幻研究中,理想的活性安慰剂的特点包括:1)急性精神作用,2)急性生理作用,3)急性作用的开始和持续时间,4)安全性,5)对目标疾病缺乏治疗作用。在本研究中,我们确定了几种可能具有活性安慰剂潜力的药物,包括中高剂量的某些短效和长效经典致幻剂,以及低剂量和微剂量的试验。结论:为了准确评估经典迷幻药作为治疗药物的安全性和有效性,未来的研究应该采用一个深思熟虑的过程来选择有效的安慰剂,并考虑辅助策略来改善涉及这些药物的试验的盲性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing blinding in classic psychedelic studies with innovative active placebos.

Rationale: Classic psychedelics show promise as a treatment for various neuropsychiatric disorders. However, weak blinding integrity in trials has been argued to limit the capacity to definitively attribute therapeutic effects to the classic psychedelic and dose under investigation. This highlights the need to explore alternative active placebos.

Objectives: We aimed to describe the drawbacks of current placebo conditions used in classic psychedelic studies, propose criteria for suitable active placebos, and review interventions that may fit these criteria.

Results: The active placebos that have typically been used in modern-day trials of classic psychedelics may not adequately blind participants, investigators, or raters. Considerations for the characteristics of ideal active placebos in classic psychedelic studies include 1) acute psychoactive effects, 2) acute physiological effects, 3) onset and duration of acute effects, 4) safety, and 5) lack of therapeutic effects in the target disease. Here, we identified several pharmacological agents that may have potential as active placebos in trials involving moderate-to-high doses of certain short-acting and long-acting classic psychedelics, as well as low-dose administration and microdosing regimes.

Conclusion: To accurately assess safety and efficacy of classic psychedelics as therapeutic drugs, future research should apply a thoughtful process for selecting active placebos and consider ancillary strategies to improve blinding in trials involving these drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信