世卫组织第一个英夫利昔单抗抗药抗体参考小组:朝着统一治疗药物监测迈出的一步。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Frontiers in Immunology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550655
Meenu Wadhwa, Isabelle Cludts, Eleanor Atkinson, Peter Rigsby
{"title":"世卫组织第一个英夫利昔单抗抗药抗体参考小组:朝着统一治疗药物监测迈出的一步。","authors":"Meenu Wadhwa, Isabelle Cludts, Eleanor Atkinson, Peter Rigsby","doi":"10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunogenicity testing for anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is mandatory for regulatory approval of a biotherapeutic and can, in some instances, continue post-licensure. Typical examples are TNF inhibitors where biotherapeutic and ADA levels are relevant in clinical decision-making for optimal patient therapy. However, challenges with non-comparability of results due to plethora of bioanalytical techniques and the lack of standardization has hindered ADA monitoring in clinical practice. Two human anti-infliximab monoclonal antibodies (A, B) with defined characteristics were therefore lyophilized and assessed for suitability as a reference panel for ADA assays in an international study. Binding assays included the simple ELISA and common electrochemiluminescence (ECL) to the rare antigen binding test and lateral flow assays. For neutralisation, competitive ligand binding and reporter-gene assays were employed. Sample testing (e.g., antibodies, sera) showed differential reactivity depending on the assay and sample. Estimates for ADA levels using in-house standards varied substantially among assays/laboratories. In contrast, using antibody A for quantitating ADA levels reduced the interlaboratory variability and provided largely consistent estimates. The degree of harmonization was dependent on the assay, sample and the laboratory. Importantly, antibody A allowed ADA detection when missed using in-house standards. Recognition of sample B varied, possibly due to its fast dissociation. Overall, the panel comprising A (coded 19/234) and B (coded 19/232) was suitable and established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in October 2022 as the WHO international reference panel for infliximab ADA assays. Sample A (coded 19/234) with an arbitrarily assigned unitage of 50,000IU/ampoule for binding activity and 50,000 IU/ampoule for neutralising activity is intended as a 'common standard' for assay characterization and where possible for calibration of anti-infliximab preparations to facilitate comparison and harmonization of results across infliximab ADA assays. Sample B (19/232) with its unique characteristics and variable detection but no assigned unitage is intended for assessing the suitability of the assay for detecting ADAs with fast dissociation. It is anticipated that this panel would help towards selecting and characterizing suitable assays, benchmarking of in-house standards where feasible and in harmonizing ADA assays used in clinical practice for better patient outcome globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":12622,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Immunology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1550655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The first WHO reference panel for Infliximab anti-drug antibodies: a step towards harmonizing therapeutic drug monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Meenu Wadhwa, Isabelle Cludts, Eleanor Atkinson, Peter Rigsby\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Immunogenicity testing for anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is mandatory for regulatory approval of a biotherapeutic and can, in some instances, continue post-licensure. Typical examples are TNF inhibitors where biotherapeutic and ADA levels are relevant in clinical decision-making for optimal patient therapy. However, challenges with non-comparability of results due to plethora of bioanalytical techniques and the lack of standardization has hindered ADA monitoring in clinical practice. Two human anti-infliximab monoclonal antibodies (A, B) with defined characteristics were therefore lyophilized and assessed for suitability as a reference panel for ADA assays in an international study. Binding assays included the simple ELISA and common electrochemiluminescence (ECL) to the rare antigen binding test and lateral flow assays. For neutralisation, competitive ligand binding and reporter-gene assays were employed. Sample testing (e.g., antibodies, sera) showed differential reactivity depending on the assay and sample. Estimates for ADA levels using in-house standards varied substantially among assays/laboratories. In contrast, using antibody A for quantitating ADA levels reduced the interlaboratory variability and provided largely consistent estimates. The degree of harmonization was dependent on the assay, sample and the laboratory. Importantly, antibody A allowed ADA detection when missed using in-house standards. Recognition of sample B varied, possibly due to its fast dissociation. Overall, the panel comprising A (coded 19/234) and B (coded 19/232) was suitable and established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in October 2022 as the WHO international reference panel for infliximab ADA assays. Sample A (coded 19/234) with an arbitrarily assigned unitage of 50,000IU/ampoule for binding activity and 50,000 IU/ampoule for neutralising activity is intended as a 'common standard' for assay characterization and where possible for calibration of anti-infliximab preparations to facilitate comparison and harmonization of results across infliximab ADA assays. Sample B (19/232) with its unique characteristics and variable detection but no assigned unitage is intended for assessing the suitability of the assay for detecting ADAs with fast dissociation. It is anticipated that this panel would help towards selecting and characterizing suitable assays, benchmarking of in-house standards where feasible and in harmonizing ADA assays used in clinical practice for better patient outcome globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Immunology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1550655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550655\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1550655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗药物抗体(ADA)的免疫原性测试是生物治疗药物监管部门批准的强制性要求,在某些情况下,可以在许可后继续进行。典型的例子是TNF抑制剂,其中生物治疗和ADA水平与最佳患者治疗的临床决策相关。然而,由于过多的生物分析技术和缺乏标准化导致的结果不可比较性的挑战阻碍了ADA在临床实践中的监测。因此,在一项国际研究中,两种具有明确特征的人抗英夫利昔单抗单克隆抗体(A、B)被冻干并评估是否适合作为ADA检测的参考样本。结合试验包括简单的ELISA和常见的电化学发光(ECL)对罕见抗原的结合试验和侧流试验。为了中和,采用竞争配体结合和报告基因测定。样品检测(如抗体、血清)显示出不同的反应性,这取决于检测方法和样品。使用内部标准的ADA水平估计值在不同的检测/实验室之间差异很大。相比之下,使用抗体A定量测定ADA水平减少了实验室间的可变性,并提供了基本一致的估计。协调的程度取决于化验、样品和实验室。重要的是,抗体A允许在使用内部标准遗漏时检测ADA。样品B的识别变化,可能是由于其快速解离。总体而言,由A(编码19/234)和B(编码19/232)组成的小组是合适的,并由世卫组织生物标准化专家委员会于2022年10月建立,作为世卫组织英夫利昔单抗ADA检测的国际参考小组。样品A(编码19/234)的结合活性单位为50,000IU/安瓿,中和活性单位为50,000IU/安瓿,旨在作为检测表征的“通用标准”,并在可能的情况下用于抗英夫利昔单抗制剂的校准,以促进英夫利昔单抗ADA检测结果的比较和协调。样品B(19/232)具有其独特的特性和可变的检测,但没有指定的单位,用于评估该方法检测快速解离的ADAs的适用性。预计该小组将有助于选择和确定合适的检测方法,在可行的情况下对内部标准进行基准测试,并在全球范围内协调临床实践中使用的ADA检测方法,以获得更好的患者结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The first WHO reference panel for Infliximab anti-drug antibodies: a step towards harmonizing therapeutic drug monitoring.

Immunogenicity testing for anti-drug antibodies (ADA) is mandatory for regulatory approval of a biotherapeutic and can, in some instances, continue post-licensure. Typical examples are TNF inhibitors where biotherapeutic and ADA levels are relevant in clinical decision-making for optimal patient therapy. However, challenges with non-comparability of results due to plethora of bioanalytical techniques and the lack of standardization has hindered ADA monitoring in clinical practice. Two human anti-infliximab monoclonal antibodies (A, B) with defined characteristics were therefore lyophilized and assessed for suitability as a reference panel for ADA assays in an international study. Binding assays included the simple ELISA and common electrochemiluminescence (ECL) to the rare antigen binding test and lateral flow assays. For neutralisation, competitive ligand binding and reporter-gene assays were employed. Sample testing (e.g., antibodies, sera) showed differential reactivity depending on the assay and sample. Estimates for ADA levels using in-house standards varied substantially among assays/laboratories. In contrast, using antibody A for quantitating ADA levels reduced the interlaboratory variability and provided largely consistent estimates. The degree of harmonization was dependent on the assay, sample and the laboratory. Importantly, antibody A allowed ADA detection when missed using in-house standards. Recognition of sample B varied, possibly due to its fast dissociation. Overall, the panel comprising A (coded 19/234) and B (coded 19/232) was suitable and established by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in October 2022 as the WHO international reference panel for infliximab ADA assays. Sample A (coded 19/234) with an arbitrarily assigned unitage of 50,000IU/ampoule for binding activity and 50,000 IU/ampoule for neutralising activity is intended as a 'common standard' for assay characterization and where possible for calibration of anti-infliximab preparations to facilitate comparison and harmonization of results across infliximab ADA assays. Sample B (19/232) with its unique characteristics and variable detection but no assigned unitage is intended for assessing the suitability of the assay for detecting ADAs with fast dissociation. It is anticipated that this panel would help towards selecting and characterizing suitable assays, benchmarking of in-house standards where feasible and in harmonizing ADA assays used in clinical practice for better patient outcome globally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
11.00%
发文量
7153
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Immunology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across basic, translational and clinical immunology. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Immunology is the official Journal of the International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS). Encompassing the entire field of Immunology, this journal welcomes papers that investigate basic mechanisms of immune system development and function, with a particular emphasis given to the description of the clinical and immunological phenotype of human immune disorders, and on the definition of their molecular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信