快速循环QI方法确保在2022年呼吸高峰期间及时提供儿科急诊护理。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alexandria Wiersma, Anthony Watkins, Traci Ertle, Bernadette Johnson, Sandra Spencer
{"title":"快速循环QI方法确保在2022年呼吸高峰期间及时提供儿科急诊护理。","authors":"Alexandria Wiersma, Anthony Watkins, Traci Ertle, Bernadette Johnson, Sandra Spencer","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In fall 2022, paediatric EDs (PEDs) and urgent cares (PUCs) cared for an unprecedented number of children, leading to long waits and boarding patients. This surge mimicked the adult ED/UC COVID-19 pandemic experience. Learning from published data and surge response plans, we adapted our response using rapid cycle quality improvement methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary PUC/PED team met to determine the current state and create interventions. After the standard seasonal surge response did not have a significant impact, we further expanded inpatient capacity, created new physical PUC space, started provider intake and transitioned PED beds to inpatient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical control charts were used to monitor metrics from 4 weeks prior to the surge to when volumes returned to baseline, but improvement was seen prior to this. Our primary outcome measure, left without being seen (LWBS) rates, decreased from a peak of 40% to <5% and PUC door-to-provider time (process measure) decreased from 158 min to 106 min before the surge was over. These metrics also dropped below the prior baseline after volumes returned to normal. PED door-to-provider time (process measure) and PUC lengths of stay (LOS) (balancing measure) were maintained throughout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using rapid cycle methodology, we responded quickly to an unprecedented patient volume by innovatively increasing staffing and space. We improved LWBS rates and PUC door-to-provider time despite high volumes and large numbers of boarding patients. We created efficiencies that allowed us to maintain PUC LOS and PED door-to-provider times during the surge. This resulted in sustained improvement, and we now operate with shorter LOS and door-to-provider times than historically achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid cycle QI methods ensure prompt paediatric emergency care during 2022 respiratory surge.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria Wiersma, Anthony Watkins, Traci Ertle, Bernadette Johnson, Sandra Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-214180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In fall 2022, paediatric EDs (PEDs) and urgent cares (PUCs) cared for an unprecedented number of children, leading to long waits and boarding patients. This surge mimicked the adult ED/UC COVID-19 pandemic experience. Learning from published data and surge response plans, we adapted our response using rapid cycle quality improvement methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multidisciplinary PUC/PED team met to determine the current state and create interventions. After the standard seasonal surge response did not have a significant impact, we further expanded inpatient capacity, created new physical PUC space, started provider intake and transitioned PED beds to inpatient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistical control charts were used to monitor metrics from 4 weeks prior to the surge to when volumes returned to baseline, but improvement was seen prior to this. Our primary outcome measure, left without being seen (LWBS) rates, decreased from a peak of 40% to <5% and PUC door-to-provider time (process measure) decreased from 158 min to 106 min before the surge was over. These metrics also dropped below the prior baseline after volumes returned to normal. PED door-to-provider time (process measure) and PUC lengths of stay (LOS) (balancing measure) were maintained throughout.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using rapid cycle methodology, we responded quickly to an unprecedented patient volume by innovatively increasing staffing and space. We improved LWBS rates and PUC door-to-provider time despite high volumes and large numbers of boarding patients. We created efficiencies that allowed us to maintain PUC LOS and PED door-to-provider times during the surge. This resulted in sustained improvement, and we now operate with shorter LOS and door-to-provider times than historically achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在2022年秋季,儿科急诊科(PEDs)和紧急护理(PUCs)照顾的儿童数量空前,导致长时间等待和寄宿制患者。这种激增模仿了成人ED/UC COVID-19大流行的经历。从公布的数据和应急响应计划中学习,我们采用快速循环质量改进方法调整了我们的响应。方法:多学科PUC/PED团队开会确定当前状态并制定干预措施。在标准的季节性激增响应没有产生显著影响后,我们进一步扩大了住院容量,创造了新的物理PUC空间,开始接受提供者,并将PED病床转变为住院病床。结果:统计控制图用于监测从激增前4周到量恢复到基线时的指标,但在此之前可以看到改善。我们的主要结局指标,未被发现(LWBS)率从40%的峰值下降到结论:使用快速循环方法,我们通过创新地增加人员和空间来快速应对前所未有的患者量。我们提高了LWBS率和PUC从门到提供者的时间,尽管寄宿率和寄宿率很高。我们创造了效率,使我们能够在激增期间保持PUC LOS和PED门到供应商的时间。这带来了持续的改进,我们现在的LOS和从门到供应商的时间比以往更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rapid cycle QI methods ensure prompt paediatric emergency care during 2022 respiratory surge.

Objectives: In fall 2022, paediatric EDs (PEDs) and urgent cares (PUCs) cared for an unprecedented number of children, leading to long waits and boarding patients. This surge mimicked the adult ED/UC COVID-19 pandemic experience. Learning from published data and surge response plans, we adapted our response using rapid cycle quality improvement methodology.

Methods: A multidisciplinary PUC/PED team met to determine the current state and create interventions. After the standard seasonal surge response did not have a significant impact, we further expanded inpatient capacity, created new physical PUC space, started provider intake and transitioned PED beds to inpatient.

Results: Statistical control charts were used to monitor metrics from 4 weeks prior to the surge to when volumes returned to baseline, but improvement was seen prior to this. Our primary outcome measure, left without being seen (LWBS) rates, decreased from a peak of 40% to <5% and PUC door-to-provider time (process measure) decreased from 158 min to 106 min before the surge was over. These metrics also dropped below the prior baseline after volumes returned to normal. PED door-to-provider time (process measure) and PUC lengths of stay (LOS) (balancing measure) were maintained throughout.

Conclusions: Using rapid cycle methodology, we responded quickly to an unprecedented patient volume by innovatively increasing staffing and space. We improved LWBS rates and PUC door-to-provider time despite high volumes and large numbers of boarding patients. We created efficiencies that allowed us to maintain PUC LOS and PED door-to-provider times during the surge. This resulted in sustained improvement, and we now operate with shorter LOS and door-to-provider times than historically achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信