James T Yoon, Yinglu Zhou, Mariia Mikhaleva, Daniel Sungchul Choi, Stacey M Fernandes, Philippe Armand, Amy C Bessnow, Jennifer L Crombie, David C Fisher, Eric D Jacobsen, Caron A Jacobson, Austin I Kim, Ann S LaCasce, Reid W Merryman, Oreofe O Odejide, Erin M Parry, David A Qualls, Christine E Ryan, Aswin Sekar, Jacob D Soumerai, Jon E Arnason, Svitlana Tyekucheva, Matthew S Davids, Jennifer R Brown, Inhye E Ahn
{"title":"Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Double Refractory and Double Exposed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.","authors":"James T Yoon, Yinglu Zhou, Mariia Mikhaleva, Daniel Sungchul Choi, Stacey M Fernandes, Philippe Armand, Amy C Bessnow, Jennifer L Crombie, David C Fisher, Eric D Jacobsen, Caron A Jacobson, Austin I Kim, Ann S LaCasce, Reid W Merryman, Oreofe O Odejide, Erin M Parry, David A Qualls, Christine E Ryan, Aswin Sekar, Jacob D Soumerai, Jon E Arnason, Svitlana Tyekucheva, Matthew S Davids, Jennifer R Brown, Inhye E Ahn","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of 95 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) post-Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor (BCL2i) failure. To clearly distinguish sensitivity and resistance to the targeted treatment classes, we defined double refractory (DR) CLL when progressive disease occurred during active treatment with a BTKi and a BCL2i given sequentially or in combination and double exposed (DE) disease when treatment with either or both of these agents was discontinued due to reasons other than progression. Thirty (31.6%) patients had DR CLL and 65 (63.2%) had DE CLL. The DR group more frequently had unmutated IGHV (97%), TP53 aberration (73%), and BTK mutations (59%) than the DE group (75%, 46%, and 27%, respectively). The median number of total lines of therapy was 6 for DR and 3 for DE. Nearly all (97%) DR patients required subsequent therapy after developing DR CLL. The most commonly used treatment was non-covalent BTKis (34%), followed by concurrent covalent BTKi and BCL2i (28%) and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (24%). Treatment for DE CLL was less frequently observed (26%). Median overall survival (OS) was 2.2 years once DR developed despite frequent initial responses to non-covalent BTKis or cellular therapy in the cohort. Patients with DE CLL demonstrated favorable survival (median OS not reached) and durable response to subsequent therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们分析了95名慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者在布鲁通酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)和B细胞淋巴瘤2抑制剂(BCL2i)治疗失败后的特征和预后。为了明确区分对靶向治疗类药物的敏感性和耐药性,我们定义了双重难治性(DR)CLL,即在连续或联合使用BTKi和BCL2i进行积极治疗期间出现进展性疾病,以及双重暴露性(DE)疾病,即由于进展以外的原因停止使用这两种药物中的一种或两种。30例(31.6%)患者患有DR CLL,65例(63.2%)患者患有DE CLL。与 DE 组(分别为 75%、46% 和 27%)相比,DR 组更常见未突变的 IGHV(97%)、TP53 畸变(73%)和 BTK 突变(59%)。DR和DE的总治疗次数中位数分别为6次和3次。几乎所有(97%)DR 患者在患上 DR CLL 后都需要接受后续治疗。最常用的治疗方法是非共价BTKis(34%),其次是共价BTKi和BCL2i(28%)以及CD19嵌合抗原受体修饰T细胞(24%)。对 DE CLL 进行治疗的比例较低(26%)。尽管队列中对非共价BTKis或细胞疗法的初始反应频繁,但一旦出现DR,中位总生存期(OS)为2.2年。DE CLL患者的生存期较长(中位OS未达到),对后续治疗的反应持久。
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Double Refractory and Double Exposed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.
We analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of 95 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) post-Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) and B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor (BCL2i) failure. To clearly distinguish sensitivity and resistance to the targeted treatment classes, we defined double refractory (DR) CLL when progressive disease occurred during active treatment with a BTKi and a BCL2i given sequentially or in combination and double exposed (DE) disease when treatment with either or both of these agents was discontinued due to reasons other than progression. Thirty (31.6%) patients had DR CLL and 65 (63.2%) had DE CLL. The DR group more frequently had unmutated IGHV (97%), TP53 aberration (73%), and BTK mutations (59%) than the DE group (75%, 46%, and 27%, respectively). The median number of total lines of therapy was 6 for DR and 3 for DE. Nearly all (97%) DR patients required subsequent therapy after developing DR CLL. The most commonly used treatment was non-covalent BTKis (34%), followed by concurrent covalent BTKi and BCL2i (28%) and CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (24%). Treatment for DE CLL was less frequently observed (26%). Median overall survival (OS) was 2.2 years once DR developed despite frequent initial responses to non-covalent BTKis or cellular therapy in the cohort. Patients with DE CLL demonstrated favorable survival (median OS not reached) and durable response to subsequent therapy.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.