Marlee Bower, Lauren M Scott, Scarlett Smout, Amarina Donohoe-Bales, Lexine A Stapinski, Gareth Bryant, Edward Jegasothy, Ross Bailie, Shamila Haddad, Arianna Brambilla, Amanda Howard, Jo McClellan, Jon Swain, Laura McGrath, Maree Teesson, Emma L Barrett, Lyrian Daniel
{"title":"在气候变化和心理健康的现有经验模型中确定建筑环境:全球系统范围审查议定书。","authors":"Marlee Bower, Lauren M Scott, Scarlett Smout, Amarina Donohoe-Bales, Lexine A Stapinski, Gareth Bryant, Edward Jegasothy, Ross Bailie, Shamila Haddad, Arianna Brambilla, Amanda Howard, Jo McClellan, Jon Swain, Laura McGrath, Maree Teesson, Emma L Barrett, Lyrian Daniel","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Where a person lives, the characteristics of their housing and neighbourhood environment influence their exposure to climate-related hazards and vulnerability to associated mental health impacts. This suggests that the built environment may be a promising focus for integrated policy responses to climate change and public mental health challenges. However, few empirical studies have focused on the role of the built environment as an important mediator of climate-attributable mental health burden. The proposed scoping review seeks to identify and synthesise existing conceptual models and frameworks linking climate change to mental health via built environment pathways. We aim to provide a preliminary overview of the housing and neighbourhood pathways through which climate change may impact mental health, which will inform future empirical work in this emerging area of research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A systematic scoping review of the global peer-reviewed and grey literature will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. Included articles must present a conceptual model or framework incorporating relevant built environment pathways through which climate change may impact mental health and well-being. Relevant models and frameworks will be identified through systematic searches (for English-language reports) of Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases. Two reviewers will independently screen the article titles, abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction will occur using a predefined template. The presentation of findings will conform to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, including a narrative synthesis of the role of housing and neighbourhood factors in the relationship between climate change and mental health, as identified from the existing literature. The review will lay essential foundations for future empirical research and place-based policy responses to the mental health consequences of a changing climate.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The scoping review will be a secondary analysis of published data, for which ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and targeted distribution to stakeholders involved in climate change, built environment and health research and policymaking.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XR74C.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 4","pages":"e093222"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locating the built environment within existing empirical models of climate change and mental health: protocol for a global systematic scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Marlee Bower, Lauren M Scott, Scarlett Smout, Amarina Donohoe-Bales, Lexine A Stapinski, Gareth Bryant, Edward Jegasothy, Ross Bailie, Shamila Haddad, Arianna Brambilla, Amanda Howard, Jo McClellan, Jon Swain, Laura McGrath, Maree Teesson, Emma L Barrett, Lyrian Daniel\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Where a person lives, the characteristics of their housing and neighbourhood environment influence their exposure to climate-related hazards and vulnerability to associated mental health impacts. This suggests that the built environment may be a promising focus for integrated policy responses to climate change and public mental health challenges. However, few empirical studies have focused on the role of the built environment as an important mediator of climate-attributable mental health burden. The proposed scoping review seeks to identify and synthesise existing conceptual models and frameworks linking climate change to mental health via built environment pathways. We aim to provide a preliminary overview of the housing and neighbourhood pathways through which climate change may impact mental health, which will inform future empirical work in this emerging area of research.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A systematic scoping review of the global peer-reviewed and grey literature will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. Included articles must present a conceptual model or framework incorporating relevant built environment pathways through which climate change may impact mental health and well-being. Relevant models and frameworks will be identified through systematic searches (for English-language reports) of Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases. Two reviewers will independently screen the article titles, abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction will occur using a predefined template. The presentation of findings will conform to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, including a narrative synthesis of the role of housing and neighbourhood factors in the relationship between climate change and mental health, as identified from the existing literature. The review will lay essential foundations for future empirical research and place-based policy responses to the mental health consequences of a changing climate.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The scoping review will be a secondary analysis of published data, for which ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and targeted distribution to stakeholders involved in climate change, built environment and health research and policymaking.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Open Science Framework: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XR74C.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"e093222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093222\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:在一个人居住的地方,其住房和邻里环境的特点会影响其对气候相关危害的暴露程度以及对相关心理健康影响的脆弱性。这表明,建筑环境可能是应对气候变化和公共心理健康挑战的综合政策的一个有希望的重点。然而,很少有实证研究关注建筑环境作为气候归因心理健康负担的重要中介的作用。拟议的范围审查旨在确定和综合现有的概念模型和框架,通过建筑环境途径将气候变化与心理健康联系起来。我们的目标是提供气候变化可能影响心理健康的住房和社区途径的初步概述,这将为这一新兴研究领域的未来实证工作提供信息。方法和分析:将根据Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架和乔安娜布里格斯研究所的建议,对全球同行评议文献和灰色文献进行系统的范围审查。纳入的文章必须提出一个概念模型或框架,结合气候变化可能影响心理健康和福祉的相关建筑环境途径。相关的模型和框架将通过Medline、PsycINFO、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和灰色文献数据库的系统搜索(英文报告)来确定。两名审稿人将独立筛选文章标题、摘要和全文,冲突由第三名审稿人解决。数据提取将使用预定义的模板进行。研究结果的陈述将符合系统评价的首选报告项目和扩展范围评价的荟萃分析,包括从现有文献中确定的住房和邻里因素在气候变化与心理健康之间关系中的作用的叙述性综合。该审查将为未来的实证研究和针对气候变化的心理健康后果的基于地方的政策反应奠定重要基础。伦理和传播:范围审查将是对已发表数据的二次分析,不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过同行评议出版物进行传播,并有针对性地分发给参与气候变化、建筑环境和健康研究及决策的利益攸关方。研究注册:开放科学框架:doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XR74C。
Locating the built environment within existing empirical models of climate change and mental health: protocol for a global systematic scoping review.
Introduction: Where a person lives, the characteristics of their housing and neighbourhood environment influence their exposure to climate-related hazards and vulnerability to associated mental health impacts. This suggests that the built environment may be a promising focus for integrated policy responses to climate change and public mental health challenges. However, few empirical studies have focused on the role of the built environment as an important mediator of climate-attributable mental health burden. The proposed scoping review seeks to identify and synthesise existing conceptual models and frameworks linking climate change to mental health via built environment pathways. We aim to provide a preliminary overview of the housing and neighbourhood pathways through which climate change may impact mental health, which will inform future empirical work in this emerging area of research.
Methods and analysis: A systematic scoping review of the global peer-reviewed and grey literature will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations. Included articles must present a conceptual model or framework incorporating relevant built environment pathways through which climate change may impact mental health and well-being. Relevant models and frameworks will be identified through systematic searches (for English-language reports) of Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature databases. Two reviewers will independently screen the article titles, abstracts and full texts, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Data extraction will occur using a predefined template. The presentation of findings will conform to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews, including a narrative synthesis of the role of housing and neighbourhood factors in the relationship between climate change and mental health, as identified from the existing literature. The review will lay essential foundations for future empirical research and place-based policy responses to the mental health consequences of a changing climate.
Ethics and dissemination: The scoping review will be a secondary analysis of published data, for which ethics approval is not required. The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and targeted distribution to stakeholders involved in climate change, built environment and health research and policymaking.
Study registration: Open Science Framework: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XR74C.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.