IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tazim Merchant, Julia DiTosto, Elizabeth Soyemi, Lynn M Yee, Nevert Badreldin
{"title":"Clinician perspectives on the assessment and management of postpartum pain.","authors":"Tazim Merchant, Julia DiTosto, Elizabeth Soyemi, Lynn M Yee, Nevert Badreldin","doi":"10.1055/a-2573-9156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Postpartum pain management practices have significant variation and are known to be influenced by non-clinical factors. We aimed to examine factors which contribute to clinicians' assessment and management of postpartum pain, including the role of opioids.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study of obstetric clinicians providing postpartum care at a single, large, tertiary care center (11/2021-6/2022). Attending and trainee OB/GYN physicians and advance practice providers (APPs) completed in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Purposive sampling was employed to ensure a representative sample of each clinician type was included. Participants were asked about factors that influence postpartum pain management. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 46 participants, 48% were attending physicians, 32% trainee physicians, and 20% APPs. Analysis demonstrated three key themes related to postpartum assessment and management: influencing factors (knowledge or experiences that influence practice), objective findings, and the role of counseling (Table 1). While clinicians reported guidelines and patient satisfaction as major influencing factors, several also shared the inherent conflict that may arise between them. Objective findings, specifically the impact of pain on patients achieving functional goals, also influenced clinician decision making. Conversely, many participants reported the limited utility of the numeric pain scale as an objective metric. Additionally, the role of counseling in shared decision-making and providing anticipatory guidance was emphasized. Finally, clinicians had a range of opinions on the role of opioids in pain management, but many spoke to the value of opioids as second-line treatment and the impact of the opioid epidemic on prescribing practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The factors that influence clinicians' assessment and management of postpartum pain are occasionally in conflict. Furthermore, objective measures, such as the numeric pain scale, have significant limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2573-9156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:众所周知,产后疼痛治疗方法存在很大差异,并受到非临床因素的影响。我们旨在研究有助于临床医生评估和处理产后疼痛的因素,包括阿片类药物的作用:我们对在一家大型三级医疗中心提供产后护理的产科临床医生进行了一项定性研究(2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 6 月)。妇产科主治医师、实习医师和高级医师(APP)使用半结构化访谈指南完成了深度访谈。我们采用了有目的的抽样方法,以确保每种临床医生类型的样本都具有代表性。参与者被问及影响产后疼痛管理的因素。采用恒定比较法对数据进行分析:在 46 名参与者中,48% 是主治医生,32% 是实习医生,20% 是 APP。分析显示了与产后评估和管理相关的三个关键主题:影响因素(影响实践的知识或经验)、客观发现和咨询的作用(表 1)。虽然临床医生称指南和患者满意度是主要的影响因素,但也有几位医生分享了两者之间可能产生的内在冲突。客观研究结果,特别是疼痛对患者实现功能目标的影响,也影响了临床医生的决策。与此相反,许多与会者表示数字疼痛量表作为客观指标的作用有限。此外,与会者还强调了咨询在共同决策和提供预期指导中的作用。最后,临床医生对阿片类药物在疼痛治疗中的作用有不同的看法,但许多人谈到了阿片类药物作为二线治疗的价值以及阿片类药物流行对处方实践的影响:结论:影响临床医生评估和处理产后疼痛的因素偶尔会发生冲突。此外,数字疼痛量表等客观测量方法也有很大的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinician perspectives on the assessment and management of postpartum pain.

Objective: Postpartum pain management practices have significant variation and are known to be influenced by non-clinical factors. We aimed to examine factors which contribute to clinicians' assessment and management of postpartum pain, including the role of opioids.

Study design: We conducted a qualitative study of obstetric clinicians providing postpartum care at a single, large, tertiary care center (11/2021-6/2022). Attending and trainee OB/GYN physicians and advance practice providers (APPs) completed in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. Purposive sampling was employed to ensure a representative sample of each clinician type was included. Participants were asked about factors that influence postpartum pain management. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.

Results: Of 46 participants, 48% were attending physicians, 32% trainee physicians, and 20% APPs. Analysis demonstrated three key themes related to postpartum assessment and management: influencing factors (knowledge or experiences that influence practice), objective findings, and the role of counseling (Table 1). While clinicians reported guidelines and patient satisfaction as major influencing factors, several also shared the inherent conflict that may arise between them. Objective findings, specifically the impact of pain on patients achieving functional goals, also influenced clinician decision making. Conversely, many participants reported the limited utility of the numeric pain scale as an objective metric. Additionally, the role of counseling in shared decision-making and providing anticipatory guidance was emphasized. Finally, clinicians had a range of opinions on the role of opioids in pain management, but many spoke to the value of opioids as second-line treatment and the impact of the opioid epidemic on prescribing practices.

Conclusion: The factors that influence clinicians' assessment and management of postpartum pain are occasionally in conflict. Furthermore, objective measures, such as the numeric pain scale, have significant limitations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信