左西孟旦是否加速静脉-动脉ECMO脱机?倾向评分匹配分析。

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nicolas Paulo, Antoine Kimmoun, David Hajage, Pierre Hubert, David Levy, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Ouriel Saura, Grégoire Del Marmol, Quentin Moyon, Guillaume Hékimian, Melchior Gautier, Charles Edouard Luyt, Guillaume Lebreton, Bruno Levy, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt
{"title":"左西孟旦是否加速静脉-动脉ECMO脱机?倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Nicolas Paulo, Antoine Kimmoun, David Hajage, Pierre Hubert, David Levy, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Ouriel Saura, Grégoire Del Marmol, Quentin Moyon, Guillaume Hékimian, Melchior Gautier, Charles Edouard Luyt, Guillaume Lebreton, Bruno Levy, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01457-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preliminary evidence from small, single-center studies suggests levosimendan may improve the likelihood of successful venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, the literature is limited and presents conflicting results. We aimed to assess the benefits of levosimendan on VA-ECMO for time to successful ECMO weaning, using a pragmatic and rigorous definition of successful VA-ECMO weaning in patients with potential for cardiac function recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective bicentric study over 6 years was conducted, including patients who received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Patients with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock or end-stage chronic heart failure were excluded. Patients receiving levosimendan while on VA-ECMO were matched to those not receiving levosimendan during the same period, based on pre-specified variables and time from ECMO initiation. The primary endpoint was successful VA-ECMO weaning, defined as survival without death, heart transplantation, or LVAD within 30 days after VA-ECMO withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 320 patients treated with VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock were included, of whom 68 received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Propensity score matching yielded 47 unique pairs of patients with comparable characteristics. After matching, successful ECMO weaning was achieved in 16 out of 47 patients (34%) in the no-levosimendan group and 21 out of 47 patients (45%) in the levosimendan group (sHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.77-2.70]; P = 0.25). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of bridge-to-heart transplant, LVAD, or death. Left ventricular ejection fraction and aortic velocity time integral improved significantly after levosimendan in all patients, regardless of their VA-ECMO weaning status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with non-postoperative cardiogenic shock supported by peripheral VA-ECMO, levosimendan was not associated with increased rates of successful VA-ECMO weaning or improved 30-day and 6-month bridge-free survival. Results from double-blinded randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the effectiveness and optimal timing of levosimendan in this specific population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"48"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Levosimendan hasten veno-arterial ECMO weaning? A propensity score matching analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Paulo, Antoine Kimmoun, David Hajage, Pierre Hubert, David Levy, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Ouriel Saura, Grégoire Del Marmol, Quentin Moyon, Guillaume Hékimian, Melchior Gautier, Charles Edouard Luyt, Guillaume Lebreton, Bruno Levy, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-025-01457-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preliminary evidence from small, single-center studies suggests levosimendan may improve the likelihood of successful venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, the literature is limited and presents conflicting results. We aimed to assess the benefits of levosimendan on VA-ECMO for time to successful ECMO weaning, using a pragmatic and rigorous definition of successful VA-ECMO weaning in patients with potential for cardiac function recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective bicentric study over 6 years was conducted, including patients who received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Patients with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock or end-stage chronic heart failure were excluded. Patients receiving levosimendan while on VA-ECMO were matched to those not receiving levosimendan during the same period, based on pre-specified variables and time from ECMO initiation. The primary endpoint was successful VA-ECMO weaning, defined as survival without death, heart transplantation, or LVAD within 30 days after VA-ECMO withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the study period, 320 patients treated with VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock were included, of whom 68 received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Propensity score matching yielded 47 unique pairs of patients with comparable characteristics. After matching, successful ECMO weaning was achieved in 16 out of 47 patients (34%) in the no-levosimendan group and 21 out of 47 patients (45%) in the levosimendan group (sHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.77-2.70]; P = 0.25). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of bridge-to-heart transplant, LVAD, or death. Left ventricular ejection fraction and aortic velocity time integral improved significantly after levosimendan in all patients, regardless of their VA-ECMO weaning status.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with non-postoperative cardiogenic shock supported by peripheral VA-ECMO, levosimendan was not associated with increased rates of successful VA-ECMO weaning or improved 30-day and 6-month bridge-free survival. Results from double-blinded randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the effectiveness and optimal timing of levosimendan in this specific population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968594/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01457-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01457-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自小型单中心研究的初步证据表明,左西孟旦可以提高心源性休克患者静脉动脉体外膜氧合(VA-ECMO)成功脱机的可能性。然而,文献是有限的,并提出了相互矛盾的结果。我们的目的是评估左西孟旦对VA-ECMO成功脱机时间的益处,使用实用和严格的定义,在有心功能恢复潜力的患者中成功脱机VA-ECMO。方法:对在ECMO过程中接受左西孟旦治疗的患者进行为期6年的回顾性双中心研究。排除了开心术后心源性休克或终末期慢性心力衰竭的患者。根据预先指定的变量和ECMO开始的时间,在VA-ECMO期间接受左西孟丹的患者与同期未接受左西孟丹的患者相匹配。主要终点是VA-ECMO成功脱机,定义为VA-ECMO退出后30天内无死亡、心脏移植或LVAD的生存。结果:在研究期间,320例难治性心源性休克患者接受VA-ECMO治疗,其中68例在ECMO过程中接受左西孟旦治疗。倾向评分匹配产生了47对具有可比较特征的独特患者。匹配后,非左西孟丹组47例患者中有16例(34%)成功脱机,左西孟丹组47例患者中有21例(45%)成功脱机(sHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.77-2.70];p = 0.25)。同样,两组之间在心脏桥移植、LVAD或死亡方面也没有显著差异。所有患者左西孟旦后左心室射血分数和主动脉流速时间积分均显著改善,无论其VA-ECMO脱机状态如何。结论:在外周VA-ECMO支持的非术后心源性休克患者中,左西孟丹与VA-ECMO成功脱机率的增加或30天和6个月无桥生存率的提高无关。迫切需要双盲随机对照试验的结果来阐明左西孟旦在这一特定人群中的有效性和最佳时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Levosimendan hasten veno-arterial ECMO weaning? A propensity score matching analysis.

Background: Preliminary evidence from small, single-center studies suggests levosimendan may improve the likelihood of successful venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, the literature is limited and presents conflicting results. We aimed to assess the benefits of levosimendan on VA-ECMO for time to successful ECMO weaning, using a pragmatic and rigorous definition of successful VA-ECMO weaning in patients with potential for cardiac function recovery.

Methods: A retrospective bicentric study over 6 years was conducted, including patients who received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Patients with post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock or end-stage chronic heart failure were excluded. Patients receiving levosimendan while on VA-ECMO were matched to those not receiving levosimendan during the same period, based on pre-specified variables and time from ECMO initiation. The primary endpoint was successful VA-ECMO weaning, defined as survival without death, heart transplantation, or LVAD within 30 days after VA-ECMO withdrawal.

Results: Over the study period, 320 patients treated with VA-ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock were included, of whom 68 received levosimendan during their ECMO course. Propensity score matching yielded 47 unique pairs of patients with comparable characteristics. After matching, successful ECMO weaning was achieved in 16 out of 47 patients (34%) in the no-levosimendan group and 21 out of 47 patients (45%) in the levosimendan group (sHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.77-2.70]; P = 0.25). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of bridge-to-heart transplant, LVAD, or death. Left ventricular ejection fraction and aortic velocity time integral improved significantly after levosimendan in all patients, regardless of their VA-ECMO weaning status.

Conclusion: In patients with non-postoperative cardiogenic shock supported by peripheral VA-ECMO, levosimendan was not associated with increased rates of successful VA-ECMO weaning or improved 30-day and 6-month bridge-free survival. Results from double-blinded randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to clarify the effectiveness and optimal timing of levosimendan in this specific population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信