钢丝战士:保护南非萨凡纳树木免受大象袭击

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
Jitske S. Elzinga, Michelle Henley, Robin Cook, Willem Frederik de Boer
{"title":"钢丝战士:保护南非萨凡纳树木免受大象袭击","authors":"Jitske S. Elzinga,&nbsp;Michelle Henley,&nbsp;Robin Cook,&nbsp;Willem Frederik de Boer","doi":"10.1111/aje.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the Associated Private Nature Reserves (APNR), part of the Greater Kruger National Park, large tree densities decline due to the impact of browsing elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>). Wire netting around the trunk of knobthorn (<i>Senegalia nigrescens</i>) and marula (<i>Sclerocarya birrea</i>) trees is used to protect individual trees. The success of the wire netting will depend on the species, the size of the tree, and variables that describe the tree's location in terms of its suitability for elephants. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the impact of wire netting on tree survival, and to test whether tree, elephant and landscape variables were associated with tree survival. Data were collected from a nine-year survey of elephant impacts on tree species by Elephants Alive. Elephants Alive is a non-profit organisation whose mission is to ensure the survival of Africa's elephants through protection and research. A Cox proportional hazards model, that is, a survival analysis, was fitted for tree mortality and elephant impact over time. Wire netting significantly increased tree survival (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), particularly for trees with a large diameter at breast height (DBH: 39–106 cm), and had a greater protective effect on large marula trees compared to knobthorn trees (<i>p</i> = 0.045). Landscape factors also influenced tree survival, with trees closer to the Kruger National Park (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), at lower elevations (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and within 500–1500 m of water points (<i>p</i> = 0.074) having a higher risk of mortality. Trees further from roads (251–335 m) had higher survival (<i>p</i> = 0.073). These results suggest that wire netting is an effective mitigation tool for large trees in elephant-impacted landscapes, but its implementation should consider site-specific environmental factors and elephant movement patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":"63 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wire Warriors: Protecting South Africa's Savannah Trees From Elephant Encounters\",\"authors\":\"Jitske S. Elzinga,&nbsp;Michelle Henley,&nbsp;Robin Cook,&nbsp;Willem Frederik de Boer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aje.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the Associated Private Nature Reserves (APNR), part of the Greater Kruger National Park, large tree densities decline due to the impact of browsing elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>). Wire netting around the trunk of knobthorn (<i>Senegalia nigrescens</i>) and marula (<i>Sclerocarya birrea</i>) trees is used to protect individual trees. The success of the wire netting will depend on the species, the size of the tree, and variables that describe the tree's location in terms of its suitability for elephants. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the impact of wire netting on tree survival, and to test whether tree, elephant and landscape variables were associated with tree survival. Data were collected from a nine-year survey of elephant impacts on tree species by Elephants Alive. Elephants Alive is a non-profit organisation whose mission is to ensure the survival of Africa's elephants through protection and research. A Cox proportional hazards model, that is, a survival analysis, was fitted for tree mortality and elephant impact over time. Wire netting significantly increased tree survival (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), particularly for trees with a large diameter at breast height (DBH: 39–106 cm), and had a greater protective effect on large marula trees compared to knobthorn trees (<i>p</i> = 0.045). Landscape factors also influenced tree survival, with trees closer to the Kruger National Park (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), at lower elevations (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and within 500–1500 m of water points (<i>p</i> = 0.074) having a higher risk of mortality. Trees further from roads (251–335 m) had higher survival (<i>p</i> = 0.073). These results suggest that wire netting is an effective mitigation tool for large trees in elephant-impacted landscapes, but its implementation should consider site-specific environmental factors and elephant movement patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":\"63 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.70038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在联合私人自然保护区(APNR),大克鲁格国家公园的一部分,由于觅食大象(Loxodonta africana)的影响,树木密度下降。在刺果(Senegalia nigrescens)和马鲁拉(Sclerocarya birrea)树的树干周围设置铁丝网,用于保护单个树。铁丝网的成功将取决于树木的种类、树木的大小,以及描述树木位置的变量,比如它是否适合大象居住。因此,本研究的目的是量化铁丝网对树木存活的影响,并测试树木、大象和景观变量是否与树木存活相关。数据是由“活着的大象”组织收集的,该组织对大象对树种的影响进行了为期9年的调查。大象活着是一个非营利性组织,其使命是通过保护和研究来确保非洲大象的生存。Cox比例风险模型,即生存分析,拟合了树木死亡率和大象随时间的影响。钢丝网显著提高了树木的成活率(p < 0.001),特别是胸径39 ~ 106 cm的树木,并且对大型马鲁拉树的保护作用比结棘树更大(p = 0.045)。景观因素也影响树木的生存,靠近克鲁格国家公园(p < 0.001)、海拔较低(p = 0.001)、距离水点500-1500米(p = 0.074)的树木死亡风险较高。离道路越远(251 ~ 335 m)的树木存活率越高(p = 0.073)。这些结果表明,在大象影响的景观中,铁丝网是一种有效的缓解工具,但其实施应考虑特定地点的环境因素和大象的运动模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Wire Warriors: Protecting South Africa's Savannah Trees From Elephant Encounters

Wire Warriors: Protecting South Africa's Savannah Trees From Elephant Encounters

In the Associated Private Nature Reserves (APNR), part of the Greater Kruger National Park, large tree densities decline due to the impact of browsing elephants (Loxodonta africana). Wire netting around the trunk of knobthorn (Senegalia nigrescens) and marula (Sclerocarya birrea) trees is used to protect individual trees. The success of the wire netting will depend on the species, the size of the tree, and variables that describe the tree's location in terms of its suitability for elephants. The objective of this study was therefore to quantify the impact of wire netting on tree survival, and to test whether tree, elephant and landscape variables were associated with tree survival. Data were collected from a nine-year survey of elephant impacts on tree species by Elephants Alive. Elephants Alive is a non-profit organisation whose mission is to ensure the survival of Africa's elephants through protection and research. A Cox proportional hazards model, that is, a survival analysis, was fitted for tree mortality and elephant impact over time. Wire netting significantly increased tree survival (p < 0.001), particularly for trees with a large diameter at breast height (DBH: 39–106 cm), and had a greater protective effect on large marula trees compared to knobthorn trees (p = 0.045). Landscape factors also influenced tree survival, with trees closer to the Kruger National Park (p < 0.001), at lower elevations (p = 0.001), and within 500–1500 m of water points (p = 0.074) having a higher risk of mortality. Trees further from roads (251–335 m) had higher survival (p = 0.073). These results suggest that wire netting is an effective mitigation tool for large trees in elephant-impacted landscapes, but its implementation should consider site-specific environmental factors and elephant movement patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信