解决退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中农村退伍军人参与临床研究的挑战和障碍

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Marcus R. Johnson , Aliya Asghar , Danielle J. Beck , Tassos Kyriakides , Matthew P. Vincenti , Grant D. Huang
{"title":"解决退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中农村退伍军人参与临床研究的挑战和障碍","authors":"Marcus R. Johnson ,&nbsp;Aliya Asghar ,&nbsp;Danielle J. Beck ,&nbsp;Tassos Kyriakides ,&nbsp;Matthew P. Vincenti ,&nbsp;Grant D. Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The execution of clinical research in medical facilities that serve rural populations and/or that have lower care complexity levels has been proven to be challenging, as compared to larger healthcare institutions with higher complexity levels. Issues such as isolation, lack of organizational support and resources, difficulty with enrollment of study participants in rural settings, and challenges with identifying and retaining experienced clinical research staff serve as barriers to developing and establishing the necessary infrastructure to conduct clinical research at rural and/or smaller medical facilities. The United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) has the largest integrated health care system in the country and provides care to over 9 million Veterans. These considerations, combined with feedback collected from a subset of these types of (VA) Medical Centers (VAMCs) on this topic, demonstrate the need for a comprehensive enterprise-level strategy to address these challenges within the VA healthcare system. The VA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) is a clinical research infrastructure that has vast expertise in the conduct of multi-site clinical research within the VA and is well poised to lead this effort.</div><div>This manuscript describes the CSP “Advancing Capacity for Clinical Research through Engagement with Strategic Sites (ACCESS)” initiative. It focuses specifically on the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from the CSP ACCESS Workgroup (AW) during the development and implementation of a comprehensive pilot plan for engaging rural/lower complexity VAMCs (strategic sites) to participate in CSP clinical research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101466"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing challenges and barriers to rural Veteran participation in clinical research within the Veterans Affairs healthcare system\",\"authors\":\"Marcus R. Johnson ,&nbsp;Aliya Asghar ,&nbsp;Danielle J. Beck ,&nbsp;Tassos Kyriakides ,&nbsp;Matthew P. Vincenti ,&nbsp;Grant D. Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The execution of clinical research in medical facilities that serve rural populations and/or that have lower care complexity levels has been proven to be challenging, as compared to larger healthcare institutions with higher complexity levels. Issues such as isolation, lack of organizational support and resources, difficulty with enrollment of study participants in rural settings, and challenges with identifying and retaining experienced clinical research staff serve as barriers to developing and establishing the necessary infrastructure to conduct clinical research at rural and/or smaller medical facilities. The United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) has the largest integrated health care system in the country and provides care to over 9 million Veterans. These considerations, combined with feedback collected from a subset of these types of (VA) Medical Centers (VAMCs) on this topic, demonstrate the need for a comprehensive enterprise-level strategy to address these challenges within the VA healthcare system. The VA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) is a clinical research infrastructure that has vast expertise in the conduct of multi-site clinical research within the VA and is well poised to lead this effort.</div><div>This manuscript describes the CSP “Advancing Capacity for Clinical Research through Engagement with Strategic Sites (ACCESS)” initiative. It focuses specifically on the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from the CSP ACCESS Workgroup (AW) during the development and implementation of a comprehensive pilot plan for engaging rural/lower complexity VAMCs (strategic sites) to participate in CSP clinical research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实证明,与复杂性较高的大型医疗机构相比,在为农村人口服务和/或护理复杂性较低的医疗机构开展临床研究具有挑战性。隔离、缺乏组织支持和资源、在农村地区招收研究参与者的困难以及在确定和留住有经验的临床研究人员方面遇到的挑战等问题,阻碍了发展和建立必要的基础设施,以便在农村和/或较小的医疗机构开展临床研究。美国(U.S.)退伍军人事务部(VA)拥有全国最大的综合医疗保健系统,为900多万退伍军人提供医疗服务。这些考虑,结合从这些类型(VA)医疗中心(vamc)的一个子集收集的关于此主题的反馈,表明需要一个全面的企业级战略来解决VA医疗保健系统中的这些挑战。退伍军人事务部合作研究项目(CSP)是一个临床研究基础设施,在退伍军人事务部开展多地点临床研究方面拥有丰富的专业知识,并已做好领导这一努力的准备。这份手稿描述了CSP“通过参与战略站点(ACCESS)提高临床研究能力”的倡议。它特别侧重于CSP访问工作组(AW)在制定和实施一项让农村/低复杂性VAMCs(战略站点)参与CSP临床研究的综合试点计划期间的成功、挑战和经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing challenges and barriers to rural Veteran participation in clinical research within the Veterans Affairs healthcare system
The execution of clinical research in medical facilities that serve rural populations and/or that have lower care complexity levels has been proven to be challenging, as compared to larger healthcare institutions with higher complexity levels. Issues such as isolation, lack of organizational support and resources, difficulty with enrollment of study participants in rural settings, and challenges with identifying and retaining experienced clinical research staff serve as barriers to developing and establishing the necessary infrastructure to conduct clinical research at rural and/or smaller medical facilities. The United States (U.S.) Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA) has the largest integrated health care system in the country and provides care to over 9 million Veterans. These considerations, combined with feedback collected from a subset of these types of (VA) Medical Centers (VAMCs) on this topic, demonstrate the need for a comprehensive enterprise-level strategy to address these challenges within the VA healthcare system. The VA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) is a clinical research infrastructure that has vast expertise in the conduct of multi-site clinical research within the VA and is well poised to lead this effort.
This manuscript describes the CSP “Advancing Capacity for Clinical Research through Engagement with Strategic Sites (ACCESS)” initiative. It focuses specifically on the successes, challenges, and lessons learned from the CSP ACCESS Workgroup (AW) during the development and implementation of a comprehensive pilot plan for engaging rural/lower complexity VAMCs (strategic sites) to participate in CSP clinical research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信