物质使用障碍治疗人群中的甲基苯丙胺使用情况

Eniola Olatunji , Dalton James Bally , Oluwaseun Oke , Terence Tumenta , Ulunma Natalie Umesi , Vaibhav Vyas , Stanley Nkemjika
{"title":"物质使用障碍治疗人群中的甲基苯丙胺使用情况","authors":"Eniola Olatunji ,&nbsp;Dalton James Bally ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Oke ,&nbsp;Terence Tumenta ,&nbsp;Ulunma Natalie Umesi ,&nbsp;Vaibhav Vyas ,&nbsp;Stanley Nkemjika","doi":"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent data shows a sharp rise in methamphetamine use, particularly among specific racial and ethnic groups, with higher rates in males and certain age groups, alongside varying impacts based on education and income levels. Till date, there remains dearth in the literature among New York State population. This study examined the sociodemographic factors associated with methamphetamine use and its impact on treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharge (TEDS-D) from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed to investigate methamphetamine use, focusing on demographic variables. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, and bivariate chi-square tests to explore relationships, as well as bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>10.84 % of participants were aged 12–24 years, while gender indicated a predominance of males, representing 73.44 % of the study population. Rehab patients have statistically significantly higher odds of methamphetamine use as than patients in Ambulatory/ Intensive Outpatient treatment (Adj OR- 1.21; 95 % CI- 1.15,1.26), while Detox patients have lower odds of using methamphetamine as than patients in Ambulatory, Intensive Outpatient treatment, however this was not statistically significant (Adj OR-0.35; 95 % CI- 0.11, 1.10). Intravenous drugs have 1.5 times higher odds of methamphetamine use as than non-intravenous drug use (Adj OR- 1.5; 95 % CI - 1.42, 1.54).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study identified significant sociodemographic differences influencing methamphetamine use and treatment outcomes among this population. Addressing these factors with focused, culturally sensitive, and socio-economically mindful interventions can improve treatment effectiveness and aid recovery across diverse groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100804,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methamphetamine use among substance use disorder treatment populations\",\"authors\":\"Eniola Olatunji ,&nbsp;Dalton James Bally ,&nbsp;Oluwaseun Oke ,&nbsp;Terence Tumenta ,&nbsp;Ulunma Natalie Umesi ,&nbsp;Vaibhav Vyas ,&nbsp;Stanley Nkemjika\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent data shows a sharp rise in methamphetamine use, particularly among specific racial and ethnic groups, with higher rates in males and certain age groups, alongside varying impacts based on education and income levels. Till date, there remains dearth in the literature among New York State population. This study examined the sociodemographic factors associated with methamphetamine use and its impact on treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharge (TEDS-D) from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed to investigate methamphetamine use, focusing on demographic variables. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, and bivariate chi-square tests to explore relationships, as well as bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>10.84 % of participants were aged 12–24 years, while gender indicated a predominance of males, representing 73.44 % of the study population. Rehab patients have statistically significantly higher odds of methamphetamine use as than patients in Ambulatory/ Intensive Outpatient treatment (Adj OR- 1.21; 95 % CI- 1.15,1.26), while Detox patients have lower odds of using methamphetamine as than patients in Ambulatory, Intensive Outpatient treatment, however this was not statistically significant (Adj OR-0.35; 95 % CI- 0.11, 1.10). Intravenous drugs have 1.5 times higher odds of methamphetamine use as than non-intravenous drug use (Adj OR- 1.5; 95 % CI - 1.42, 1.54).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study identified significant sociodemographic differences influencing methamphetamine use and treatment outcomes among this population. Addressing these factors with focused, culturally sensitive, and socio-economically mindful interventions can improve treatment effectiveness and aid recovery across diverse groups.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949916X25000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的数据显示,甲基苯丙胺的使用急剧上升,特别是在特定种族和族裔群体中,男性和某些年龄组的使用率较高,同时受教育程度和收入水平的影响也各不相同。到目前为止,在纽约州的人口中仍然缺乏文献。本研究调查了与甲基苯丙胺使用相关的社会人口因素及其对治疗结果的影响。方法分析2016 - 2020年治疗发作数据集-出院(TEDS-D),重点分析人口统计学变量,调查甲基苯丙胺的使用情况。分析包括描述性统计、频率分布和双变量卡方检验来探索关系,以及双变量和多变量逻辑回归。结果10.84 %的参与者年龄在12-24岁之间,性别以男性为主,占研究人群的73.44 %。康复患者使用甲基苯丙胺的几率显著高于门诊/门诊重症治疗患者(比值比= 1.21;95 % CI- 1.15,1.26),而排毒患者使用甲基苯丙胺的几率低于门诊重症治疗患者,但这没有统计学意义(Adj or = 0.35;95 % ci - 0.11, 1.10)。静脉注射毒品使用甲基苯丙胺的几率是非静脉注射毒品使用的1.5倍(Adj OR- 1.5;95 % ci - 1.42, 1.54)。结论:该研究确定了影响该人群甲基苯丙胺使用和治疗结果的显著社会人口统计学差异。针对这些因素,采取有针对性的、文化上敏感的、注重社会经济的干预措施,可以提高治疗效果,帮助不同群体的康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methamphetamine use among substance use disorder treatment populations

Introduction

Recent data shows a sharp rise in methamphetamine use, particularly among specific racial and ethnic groups, with higher rates in males and certain age groups, alongside varying impacts based on education and income levels. Till date, there remains dearth in the literature among New York State population. This study examined the sociodemographic factors associated with methamphetamine use and its impact on treatment outcomes.

Method

The Treatment Episode Dataset-Discharge (TEDS-D) from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed to investigate methamphetamine use, focusing on demographic variables. The analysis involved descriptive statistics, frequency distributions, and bivariate chi-square tests to explore relationships, as well as bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4.

Results

10.84 % of participants were aged 12–24 years, while gender indicated a predominance of males, representing 73.44 % of the study population. Rehab patients have statistically significantly higher odds of methamphetamine use as than patients in Ambulatory/ Intensive Outpatient treatment (Adj OR- 1.21; 95 % CI- 1.15,1.26), while Detox patients have lower odds of using methamphetamine as than patients in Ambulatory, Intensive Outpatient treatment, however this was not statistically significant (Adj OR-0.35; 95 % CI- 0.11, 1.10). Intravenous drugs have 1.5 times higher odds of methamphetamine use as than non-intravenous drug use (Adj OR- 1.5; 95 % CI - 1.42, 1.54).

Conclusion

The study identified significant sociodemographic differences influencing methamphetamine use and treatment outcomes among this population. Addressing these factors with focused, culturally sensitive, and socio-economically mindful interventions can improve treatment effectiveness and aid recovery across diverse groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信