一项阶梯式楔形随机实施试验,以增加急诊部门低风险肺栓塞的门诊管理- MEDIC ALERT PE研究。

Shawna N Smith, Colin F Greineder, Joshua Errickson, Jessica Burns, F Jacob Seagull, Keith E Kocher, Jeffrey A Kline, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Michael S M Lanham, Sarah L Krein, Geoffrey D Barnes
{"title":"一项阶梯式楔形随机实施试验,以增加急诊部门低风险肺栓塞的门诊管理- MEDIC ALERT PE研究。","authors":"Shawna N Smith, Colin F Greineder, Joshua Errickson, Jessica Burns, F Jacob Seagull, Keith E Kocher, Jeffrey A Kline, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Michael S M Lanham, Sarah L Krein, Geoffrey D Barnes","doi":"10.1186/s43058-025-00720-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home-based care for patients diagnosed in emergency departments (EDs) with low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is an evidence-based, guideline-recommended practice that is not widely adopted in the US. Few studies demonstrate how this care pathway can be implemented effectively or test whether implementation strategies can address known barriers. Further, prior studies have lacked diversity in population and health system type and did not integrate theory-informed implementation frameworks. Although essential for establishing the evidence base for safe home management of low-risk acute PE, these studies have thus fallen short of guiding broad dissemination and equitable implementation. To bridge this gap, we are conducting a pragmatic multi-site implementation trial, guided by implementation science theory and frameworks, across twelve diverse hospital settings to assess the effectiveness of new care pathways for patients with low-risk PE presenting to EDs.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The study uses a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial design to investigate a set of implementation strategies to support establishing low-risk PE pathways in 12 EDs. Clusters of three hospitals were randomly assigned to one of four start dates, staggered over a 12-month period. During an initial three-month pre-implementation period, we will work with site champions to identify key site personnel and understand site barriers and facilitators. We will then tailor the care pathway to local needs and capabilities. During the six-month active implementation period, we will provide coaching to help sites implement a multi-component intervention informed by behavioral economics intended to address multi-level (site, provider, patient) barriers and integrate the new care pathway for discharging low-risk PE patients. Sites are then followed for a minimum of 12 months post-implementation. Our primary aim is to assess the change in discharge rates of patients with acute PE pre- and post-implementation. Secondary and exploratory aims will assess change in patient safety outcomes along with other key implementation outcomes guided by the RE-AIM framework.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study expands upon prior effectiveness research to tailor, implement, and robustly evaluate a multi-component implementation intervention for diverse health systems aiming to increase guideline-based outpatient management of low-risk PE. Broad-scale implementation in the US could avert up to 100,000 hospitalizations annually.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06312332), registered on March 13, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":73355,"journal":{"name":"Implementation science communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A stepped wedge cluster randomized implementation trial to increase outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism from the emergency department - the MEDIC ALERT PE study.\",\"authors\":\"Shawna N Smith, Colin F Greineder, Joshua Errickson, Jessica Burns, F Jacob Seagull, Keith E Kocher, Jeffrey A Kline, Jeffrey T Kullgren, Michael S M Lanham, Sarah L Krein, Geoffrey D Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43058-025-00720-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Home-based care for patients diagnosed in emergency departments (EDs) with low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is an evidence-based, guideline-recommended practice that is not widely adopted in the US. Few studies demonstrate how this care pathway can be implemented effectively or test whether implementation strategies can address known barriers. Further, prior studies have lacked diversity in population and health system type and did not integrate theory-informed implementation frameworks. Although essential for establishing the evidence base for safe home management of low-risk acute PE, these studies have thus fallen short of guiding broad dissemination and equitable implementation. To bridge this gap, we are conducting a pragmatic multi-site implementation trial, guided by implementation science theory and frameworks, across twelve diverse hospital settings to assess the effectiveness of new care pathways for patients with low-risk PE presenting to EDs.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The study uses a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial design to investigate a set of implementation strategies to support establishing low-risk PE pathways in 12 EDs. Clusters of three hospitals were randomly assigned to one of four start dates, staggered over a 12-month period. During an initial three-month pre-implementation period, we will work with site champions to identify key site personnel and understand site barriers and facilitators. We will then tailor the care pathway to local needs and capabilities. During the six-month active implementation period, we will provide coaching to help sites implement a multi-component intervention informed by behavioral economics intended to address multi-level (site, provider, patient) barriers and integrate the new care pathway for discharging low-risk PE patients. Sites are then followed for a minimum of 12 months post-implementation. Our primary aim is to assess the change in discharge rates of patients with acute PE pre- and post-implementation. Secondary and exploratory aims will assess change in patient safety outcomes along with other key implementation outcomes guided by the RE-AIM framework.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study expands upon prior effectiveness research to tailor, implement, and robustly evaluate a multi-component implementation intervention for diverse health systems aiming to increase guideline-based outpatient management of low-risk PE. Broad-scale implementation in the US could avert up to 100,000 hospitalizations annually.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06312332), registered on March 13, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implementation science communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00720-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation science communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-025-00720-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对在急诊科(EDs)诊断为低风险肺栓塞(PE)的患者进行家庭护理是一种循证、指南推荐的做法,但在美国并未被广泛采用。很少有研究表明如何有效地实施这种护理途径或测试实施策略是否可以解决已知的障碍。此外,先前的研究缺乏人口和卫生系统类型的多样性,并且没有整合基于理论的实施框架。尽管这些研究对于建立低风险急性肺心病安全家庭管理的证据基础至关重要,但却无法指导广泛传播和公平实施。为了弥补这一差距,我们在实施科学理论和框架的指导下,在12家不同的医院环境中开展了一项实用的多地点实施试验,以评估新护理途径对急诊低风险PE患者的有效性。方法/设计:本研究采用集群随机楔形试验设计来研究一套实施策略,以支持在12个急症患者中建立低风险的体育锻炼途径。三家医院群被随机分配到四个开始日期之一,在12个月期间错开。在最初三个月的预实施期间,我们将与网站负责人合作,确定关键的网站人员,了解网站的障碍和促进因素。然后,我们将根据当地的需求和能力定制护理路径。在为期6个月的积极实施期内,我们将提供指导,帮助医院实施基于行为经济学的多成分干预,旨在解决多层次(医院、提供者、患者)障碍,并整合低风险PE患者出院的新护理途径。然后在实施后对站点进行至少12个月的跟踪。我们的主要目的是评估急性肺水肿患者实施前后出院率的变化。次要目标和探索性目标将评估患者安全结果的变化以及RE-AIM框架指导下的其他关键实施结果。讨论:本研究扩展了先前的有效性研究,为不同的卫生系统量身定制、实施和稳健评估多组件实施干预措施,旨在增加基于指南的低风险PE门诊管理。在美国大规模实施,每年可避免多达10万人住院。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06312332),注册于2024年3月13日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A stepped wedge cluster randomized implementation trial to increase outpatient management of low-risk pulmonary embolism from the emergency department - the MEDIC ALERT PE study.

Background: Home-based care for patients diagnosed in emergency departments (EDs) with low-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) is an evidence-based, guideline-recommended practice that is not widely adopted in the US. Few studies demonstrate how this care pathway can be implemented effectively or test whether implementation strategies can address known barriers. Further, prior studies have lacked diversity in population and health system type and did not integrate theory-informed implementation frameworks. Although essential for establishing the evidence base for safe home management of low-risk acute PE, these studies have thus fallen short of guiding broad dissemination and equitable implementation. To bridge this gap, we are conducting a pragmatic multi-site implementation trial, guided by implementation science theory and frameworks, across twelve diverse hospital settings to assess the effectiveness of new care pathways for patients with low-risk PE presenting to EDs.

Methods/design: The study uses a cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial design to investigate a set of implementation strategies to support establishing low-risk PE pathways in 12 EDs. Clusters of three hospitals were randomly assigned to one of four start dates, staggered over a 12-month period. During an initial three-month pre-implementation period, we will work with site champions to identify key site personnel and understand site barriers and facilitators. We will then tailor the care pathway to local needs and capabilities. During the six-month active implementation period, we will provide coaching to help sites implement a multi-component intervention informed by behavioral economics intended to address multi-level (site, provider, patient) barriers and integrate the new care pathway for discharging low-risk PE patients. Sites are then followed for a minimum of 12 months post-implementation. Our primary aim is to assess the change in discharge rates of patients with acute PE pre- and post-implementation. Secondary and exploratory aims will assess change in patient safety outcomes along with other key implementation outcomes guided by the RE-AIM framework.

Discussion: This study expands upon prior effectiveness research to tailor, implement, and robustly evaluate a multi-component implementation intervention for diverse health systems aiming to increase guideline-based outpatient management of low-risk PE. Broad-scale implementation in the US could avert up to 100,000 hospitalizations annually.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06312332), registered on March 13, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信