澳大利亚全科医生对食管胃癌相关症状的诊断检测模式

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery
{"title":"澳大利亚全科医生对食管胃癌相关症状的诊断检测模式","authors":"Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of Diagnostic Testing for Oesophagogastric Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Shaoke Lei, Brent Venning, Alison Pearce, Alex Lee, Jon Emery\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0621","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食管胃(OG)癌相关症状在初级保健中很常见,但大多数研究都集中在确诊的OG癌患者身上,而不是首次出现症状的患者。目的:探讨与OG癌相关的上消化道症状的诊断检测模式。设计和背景:回顾性队列研究使用了一个关联的初级保健数据库。该研究包括在2008年至2022年期间出现OG癌症状的55岁及以上的未识别患者。我们分析了接受病理、影像学、转诊、内窥镜检查或治疗测试的患者比例。研究人员还检查了社会经济群体之间的差异,以及被诊断为OG癌的患者比例。结果:研究队列包括44,402例患者,其中126例(0.28%)在出现后12个月内被诊断为OG癌。反流是最常见的症状(57%),其次是恶心(11%)。75岁以上的患者接受调查或转诊的可能性较小(or = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001)。来自弱势地区的人被调查的可能性是弱势地区的1.4倍(OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001)。接受“治疗试验”药物治疗的患者接受进一步调查的可能性较小(OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001)。多种症状和就诊增加了调查的可能性(OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001)。结论:诊断检测的显著差异可能导致OG癌预后的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patterns of Diagnostic Testing for Oesophagogastric Cancer-Related Symptoms in Australian General Practice.

Background: Oesophagogastric (OG) cancer-associated symptoms are common in primary care, but most research has focused on patients with a confirmed OG cancer diagnosis, rather than those presenting with symptoms for the first time.

Aim: To examine diagnostic testing patterns for upper gastrointestinal symptoms linked to OG cancer.

Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study used a linked primary care database. It included de-identified patients aged 55 and older who presented with symptoms suggestive of OG cancer between 2008 and 2022. We analysed the proportion of patients who underwent pathology, imaging, referral, endoscopy, or a test of treatment. Differences across socioeconomic groups were also examined, along with the proportion of patients diagnosed with OG cancer.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 44,402 patients, of whom 126 (0.28%) were diagnosed with OG cancer within 12 months of presentation. Reflux was the most common symptom (57%), followed by nausea (11%). Patients over 75 were less likely to be investigated or referred (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.56-0.62, p < 0.001). Those from less disadvantaged areas were 1.4 times more likely to be investigated (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53, p < 0.001). Patients on 'test of treatment' medications were less likely to receive further investigation (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.69, p < 0.001). Multiple symptoms and visits increased the likelihood of investigation (OR = 2.77, 95% CI: 2.55-3.00, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Significant variations in diagnostic testing could contribute to disparities in OG cancer outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信