在刻意练习中评估临床微技能:临床微技能训练(CMST)量表的验证。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jana Bommer, Wolfgang Lutz, Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer
{"title":"在刻意练习中评估临床微技能:临床微技能训练(CMST)量表的验证。","authors":"Jana Bommer, Wolfgang Lutz, Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2025.2485156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a video rating instrument designed to assess transtheoretical clinical micro-skills within deliberate practice (DP) exercises.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Clinical Micro-Skill Training (CMST) Scale was developed based on three established therapeutic competence measures and refined by expert clinician input. The instrument was then applied by trainee psychotherapists to rate <i>N</i> = 433 videos from <i>N</i> = 59 training candidates, who responded to simulated patient statements as if they were the therapist in that situation. Descriptive results, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, item structure, convergent and discriminant validity were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CMST demonstrated good reliability, with an internal consistency of <i>ω</i> = .82 and inter-rater reliability of <i>ICC</i> = .73 for the total score. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors-Interpersonal Competence, Communication Competence, and Process and Time Management. The CMST also exhibited satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CMST demonstrates feasibility, reliability, validity, and efficiency in the assessment of therapeutic micro-skills. Its multidimensional structure allows for a nuanced approach, moving beyond mean scores to evaluate and target specific competence facets for improvement. However, its predictive validity for treatment outcomes remains to be explored in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing clinical micro-skills in deliberate practice exercises: validation of the clinical micro-skill training (CMST) scale.\",\"authors\":\"Jana Bommer, Wolfgang Lutz, Anne-Katharina Deisenhofer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2025.2485156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a video rating instrument designed to assess transtheoretical clinical micro-skills within deliberate practice (DP) exercises.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Clinical Micro-Skill Training (CMST) Scale was developed based on three established therapeutic competence measures and refined by expert clinician input. The instrument was then applied by trainee psychotherapists to rate <i>N</i> = 433 videos from <i>N</i> = 59 training candidates, who responded to simulated patient statements as if they were the therapist in that situation. Descriptive results, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, item structure, convergent and discriminant validity were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CMST demonstrated good reliability, with an internal consistency of <i>ω</i> = .82 and inter-rater reliability of <i>ICC</i> = .73 for the total score. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors-Interpersonal Competence, Communication Competence, and Process and Time Management. The CMST also exhibited satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CMST demonstrates feasibility, reliability, validity, and efficiency in the assessment of therapeutic micro-skills. Its multidimensional structure allows for a nuanced approach, moving beyond mean scores to evaluate and target specific competence facets for improvement. However, its predictive validity for treatment outcomes remains to be explored in future studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2485156\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2025.2485156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发和验证一种视频评分工具,用于评估故意练习(DP)练习中的跨理论临床微技能。方法:临床微技能训练(CMST)量表是根据已有的三种治疗能力测量方法编制的,并根据临床专家的意见进行完善。然后,实习心理治疗师使用该工具对来自N = 59名培训候选人的N = 433个视频进行评分,这些候选人对模拟的患者陈述做出反应,就好像他们是该情况下的治疗师一样。对描述性结果、内部一致性、量表间信度、项目结构、收敛效度和判别效度进行了检验。结果:CMST具有良好的信度,内部一致性为ω =。(82),量表间信度=。总分是73分。探索性因子分析显示人际能力、沟通能力和过程与时间管理三个因素。CMST也表现出令人满意的收敛效度和判别效度。结论:CMST评价治疗微技能具有可行性、信度、效度和有效性。它的多维结构允许一种细致入微的方法,超越平均分来评估和针对特定的能力方面进行改进。然而,其对治疗结果的预测有效性仍需在未来研究中探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing clinical micro-skills in deliberate practice exercises: validation of the clinical micro-skill training (CMST) scale.

Objective: To develop and validate a video rating instrument designed to assess transtheoretical clinical micro-skills within deliberate practice (DP) exercises.

Method: The Clinical Micro-Skill Training (CMST) Scale was developed based on three established therapeutic competence measures and refined by expert clinician input. The instrument was then applied by trainee psychotherapists to rate N = 433 videos from N = 59 training candidates, who responded to simulated patient statements as if they were the therapist in that situation. Descriptive results, internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, item structure, convergent and discriminant validity were examined.

Results: The CMST demonstrated good reliability, with an internal consistency of ω = .82 and inter-rater reliability of ICC = .73 for the total score. Exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors-Interpersonal Competence, Communication Competence, and Process and Time Management. The CMST also exhibited satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity.

Conclusion: The CMST demonstrates feasibility, reliability, validity, and efficiency in the assessment of therapeutic micro-skills. Its multidimensional structure allows for a nuanced approach, moving beyond mean scores to evaluate and target specific competence facets for improvement. However, its predictive validity for treatment outcomes remains to be explored in future studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信