IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Adhvithi Pingili, Lakshmi Sai Meghana Kodali, Mounika Reddy Vadiyala, Lida Koskina, Bhavin A Patel, Koushik Sanku, Rupak Desai, Meera Kondapaneni
{"title":"Impact of pre-procedural red cell distribution width on one-year all-cause mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Adhvithi Pingili, Lakshmi Sai Meghana Kodali, Mounika Reddy Vadiyala, Lida Koskina, Bhavin A Patel, Koushik Sanku, Rupak Desai, Meera Kondapaneni","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red cell distribution width (RDW) has emerged as a novel biomarker associated with adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of pre-procedural RDW levels on one-year all-cause mortality (ACM) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis due to limited evidence on the impact of RDW levels in TAVR patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed articles on pre-procedural RDW and one-year ACM post-TAVR until February 2024 using PubMed and Google Scholar. Binary random effects model was used for pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR), with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistics for heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7 studies with 3273 patients aged between 70-90 years and 45 % males were analyzed. High pre-procedural RDW was an independent predictor of one-year ACM (aOR 1.60, 95%CI 1.13-2.27, p < 0.01). This association is even more prominent when aged > 80 years vs. <80 years (aOR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.17-2.31, p < 0.01 vs. aOR 1.46, 95 % CI 0.49-4.32, p < 0.01). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis validated the robustness of our meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicated that elevated baseline RDW is an independent predictor of one-year ACM post-TAVR. Further studies are needed to validate the importance of RDW as a marker of post-TAVR outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2025.03.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:红细胞分布宽度(RDW)已成为与心血管疾病(CVD)患者不良预后相关的新型生物标志物。由于有关 RDW 水平对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)患者影响的证据有限,我们旨在通过进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,确定手术前 RDW 水平对经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后一年全因死亡率(ACM)的预后意义:我们使用 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 系统性地回顾了截至 2024 年 2 月有关手术前 RDW 和 TAVR 术后一年 ACM 的文章。采用二元随机效应模型对调整后的赔率(aOR)进行汇总,并使用95%置信区间(CI)和I2统计量进行异质性分析:共分析了 7 项研究,3273 名患者的年龄在 70-90 岁之间,男性占 45%。手术前 RDW 偏高是一年期 ACM 的独立预测因素(aOR 1.60,95%CI 1.13-2.27,p 80 岁 vs. 80 岁):我们的研究表明,基线 RDW 升高是 TAVR 术后一年 ACM 的独立预测因素。还需要进一步的研究来验证 RDW 作为 TAVR 术后预后标志物的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of pre-procedural red cell distribution width on one-year all-cause mortality following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Red cell distribution width (RDW) has emerged as a novel biomarker associated with adverse outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to determine the prognostic significance of pre-procedural RDW levels on one-year all-cause mortality (ACM) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis due to limited evidence on the impact of RDW levels in TAVR patients.

Methods: We systematically reviewed articles on pre-procedural RDW and one-year ACM post-TAVR until February 2024 using PubMed and Google Scholar. Binary random effects model was used for pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR), with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) and I2 statistics for heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 7 studies with 3273 patients aged between 70-90 years and 45 % males were analyzed. High pre-procedural RDW was an independent predictor of one-year ACM (aOR 1.60, 95%CI 1.13-2.27, p < 0.01). This association is even more prominent when aged > 80 years vs. <80 years (aOR 1.64, 95 % CI 1.17-2.31, p < 0.01 vs. aOR 1.46, 95 % CI 0.49-4.32, p < 0.01). Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis validated the robustness of our meta-analysis.

Conclusions: Our study indicated that elevated baseline RDW is an independent predictor of one-year ACM post-TAVR. Further studies are needed to validate the importance of RDW as a marker of post-TAVR outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信