增强现实髋关节导航系统与Naviswiss系统在全髋关节置换术中使用后外侧入路的髋杯对准。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Koji Katoh, Katsuhiro Lee
{"title":"增强现实髋关节导航系统与Naviswiss系统在全髋关节置换术中使用后外侧入路的髋杯对准。","authors":"Koji Katoh, Katsuhiro Lee","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0148.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>No studies have compared two portable navigation systems, including augmented reality (AR) hip navigation and the Naviswiss system, to improve the accuracy of acetabular component alignment during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the posterolateral approach. We investigated the difference in cup placement accuracy between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared THAs performed using the AR hip navigation (n = 32) and those performed using Naviswiss (n = 41) from June 2021 to April 2023. All patients underwent THA in the posterolateral approach. The primary endpoint includes radiological inclination (RI) and radiological anteversion (RA) measured on postoperative radiographs, and the absolute value error of radiological inclination (δRI) and radiological anteversion (δRA) between the final cup alignment displayed on the navigation screen at final cup fixation and cup alignment measured on postoperative radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in the mean RI and mean rRA and δRI and δRA were found between the two groups. The percentage of cases with both δRI and δRA of < 3° were 31% and 24% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The percentage of cases in both δRI and δRA of < 5° was 66% and 90% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively (p = 0.009). No cases demonstrated both δRI and δRA of > 5°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two systems. The Naviswiss system demonstrated a higher percentage of errors within 5° than the AR navigation system, indicating that Naviswiss reproduced functional pelvic plane more accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 4","pages":"391-397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmented reality hip navigation system versus the Naviswiss system in cup alignment during total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach.\",\"authors\":\"Koji Katoh, Katsuhiro Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0148.R1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>No studies have compared two portable navigation systems, including augmented reality (AR) hip navigation and the Naviswiss system, to improve the accuracy of acetabular component alignment during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the posterolateral approach. We investigated the difference in cup placement accuracy between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively compared THAs performed using the AR hip navigation (n = 32) and those performed using Naviswiss (n = 41) from June 2021 to April 2023. All patients underwent THA in the posterolateral approach. The primary endpoint includes radiological inclination (RI) and radiological anteversion (RA) measured on postoperative radiographs, and the absolute value error of radiological inclination (δRI) and radiological anteversion (δRA) between the final cup alignment displayed on the navigation screen at final cup fixation and cup alignment measured on postoperative radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences in the mean RI and mean rRA and δRI and δRA were found between the two groups. The percentage of cases with both δRI and δRA of < 3° were 31% and 24% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The percentage of cases in both δRI and δRA of < 5° was 66% and 90% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively (p = 0.009). No cases demonstrated both δRI and δRA of > 5°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two systems. The Naviswiss system demonstrated a higher percentage of errors within 5° than the AR navigation system, indicating that Naviswiss reproduced functional pelvic plane more accurately.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"391-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0148.R1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.64.BJO-2024-0148.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:没有研究比较两种便携式导航系统,包括增强现实(AR)髋关节导航和Naviswiss系统,以提高全髋关节置换术(THA)后外侧入路中髋臼假体对齐的准确性。我们研究了两种系统在杯子放置精度上的差异。方法:我们回顾性比较了2021年6月至2023年4月期间使用AR髋关节导航(n = 32)和使用Naviswiss (n = 41)进行的tha。所有患者均在后外侧入路行THA。主要终点包括术后x线片测量的放射倾斜度(RI)和放射前倾度(RA),以及最终杯固定时导航屏幕上显示的最终杯对中值与术后x线片测量的杯对中值之间的放射倾斜度(δRI)和放射前倾度(δRA)的绝对值误差。结果:两组患者平均RI与平均rRA、δRI与δRA比较差异无统计学意义。AR髋关节组和navisswiss组δRI和δRA均< 3°的比例分别为31%和24%,差异无统计学意义。AR髋关节组和Naviswiss组δRI和δRA < 5°的比例分别为66%和90% (p = 0.009)。没有病例显示δRI和δRA均为bbb50°。结论:两种系统间无明显差异。与AR导航系统相比,Naviswiss系统在5°范围内显示出更高的误差百分比,这表明Naviswiss系统更准确地再现了功能性骨盆平面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Augmented reality hip navigation system versus the Naviswiss system in cup alignment during total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral approach.

Aims: No studies have compared two portable navigation systems, including augmented reality (AR) hip navigation and the Naviswiss system, to improve the accuracy of acetabular component alignment during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the posterolateral approach. We investigated the difference in cup placement accuracy between the two systems.

Methods: We retrospectively compared THAs performed using the AR hip navigation (n = 32) and those performed using Naviswiss (n = 41) from June 2021 to April 2023. All patients underwent THA in the posterolateral approach. The primary endpoint includes radiological inclination (RI) and radiological anteversion (RA) measured on postoperative radiographs, and the absolute value error of radiological inclination (δRI) and radiological anteversion (δRA) between the final cup alignment displayed on the navigation screen at final cup fixation and cup alignment measured on postoperative radiographs.

Results: No significant differences in the mean RI and mean rRA and δRI and δRA were found between the two groups. The percentage of cases with both δRI and δRA of < 3° were 31% and 24% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively, with no significant difference. The percentage of cases in both δRI and δRA of < 5° was 66% and 90% in the AR hip and Naviswiss groups, respectively (p = 0.009). No cases demonstrated both δRI and δRA of > 5°.

Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the two systems. The Naviswiss system demonstrated a higher percentage of errors within 5° than the AR navigation system, indicating that Naviswiss reproduced functional pelvic plane more accurately.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信