使用组织学参考文献对自身免疫性肝炎患者进行纤维化测试-ActiTest、瞬时弹性成像和纤维化-4 指数的诊断性能。

IF 2.5 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Valentina Peta, Yuliya Sandler, Olivier Deckmyn, Oksana Duroselle, Elena Vinnitskaya, Sergey Khomeriki, Karina Noskova, Thierry Poynard
{"title":"使用组织学参考文献对自身免疫性肝炎患者进行纤维化测试-ActiTest、瞬时弹性成像和纤维化-4 指数的诊断性能。","authors":"Valentina Peta, Yuliya Sandler, Olivier Deckmyn, Oksana Duroselle, Elena Vinnitskaya, Sergey Khomeriki, Karina Noskova, Thierry Poynard","doi":"10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis, but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests [FibroTest, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and two activity biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and ActiTest].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy, hepatic elastography results, and laboratory markers were available. Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the Obuchowski measure (OM), and the Bayesian latent class model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis (≥ F2), with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.90], 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.92), and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.80), respectively. The mean (standard error) OM values were 0.92 (0.01), 0.93 (0.01), and 0.88 (0.02) for FibroTest, VCTE, and FIB-4, respectively; FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably, and both were superior to FIB-4 (<i>P</i> = 0.03 and <i>P</i> = 0.005). The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76-0.92) for ActiTest and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90) for ALT (<i>P</i> = 0.06). The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92 (0.02) and 0.90 (0.02), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM. FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":23687,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Hepatology","volume":"17 3","pages":"104534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of FibroTest-ActiTest, transient elastography, and the fibrosis-4 index in patients with autoimmune hepatitis using histological reference.\",\"authors\":\"Valentina Peta, Yuliya Sandler, Olivier Deckmyn, Oksana Duroselle, Elena Vinnitskaya, Sergey Khomeriki, Karina Noskova, Thierry Poynard\",\"doi\":\"10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis, but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests [FibroTest, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and two activity biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and ActiTest].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy, hepatic elastography results, and laboratory markers were available. Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the Obuchowski measure (OM), and the Bayesian latent class model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis (≥ F2), with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.90], 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.92), and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.80), respectively. The mean (standard error) OM values were 0.92 (0.01), 0.93 (0.01), and 0.88 (0.02) for FibroTest, VCTE, and FIB-4, respectively; FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably, and both were superior to FIB-4 (<i>P</i> = 0.03 and <i>P</i> = 0.005). The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76-0.92) for ActiTest and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90) for ALT (<i>P</i> = 0.06). The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92 (0.02) and 0.90 (0.02), respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM. FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"104534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959656/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v17.i3.104534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无创检测对于自身免疫性肝炎患者的管理和随访至关重要,但由于数据不足,其有效性受到限制。目的:探讨三种无创纤维化试验(FibroTest、振动控制瞬时弹性成像(VCTE)、纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)和两种活性生物标志物(丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)和ActiTest)的诊断价值。方法:本研究纳入了103例肝活检、肝弹性成像结果和实验室标志物可用的患者。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、Obuchowski测量法(OM)和贝叶斯潜类模型评估诊断效果。结果:在明显纤维化(≥F2)的病例中,FibroTest和VCTE优于FIB-4, ROC曲线下面积分别为0.83(95%可信区间(CI): 0.73-0.90)、0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.92)和0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.80)。FibroTest、VCTE和FIB-4的OM平均值(标准误差)分别为0.92(0.01)、0.93(0.01)和0.88 (0.02);FibroTest和VCTE表现相当,两者均优于FIB-4 (P = 0.03和P = 0.005)。活性生物标志物的ROC曲线下面积ActiTest为0.86 (95%CI: 0.76-0.92), ALT为0.84 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90) (P = 0.06)。ActiTest和ALT的OM值分别为0.92(0.02)和0.90(0.02),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.005)。结论:根据OM, FibroTest和VCTE优于FIB-4。FibroTest-ActiTest促进了纤维化和活性的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of FibroTest-ActiTest, transient elastography, and the fibrosis-4 index in patients with autoimmune hepatitis using histological reference.

Background: Noninvasive tests are crucial for the management and follow-up of patients with autoimmune hepatitis, but their validation is limited because of insufficient data.

Aim: To investigate the diagnostic performance of three fibrosis noninvasive tests [FibroTest, vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and two activity biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and ActiTest].

Methods: This study enrolled 103 patients for whom liver biopsy, hepatic elastography results, and laboratory markers were available. Diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the Obuchowski measure (OM), and the Bayesian latent class model.

Results: FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 in cases of significant fibrosis (≥ F2), with areas under the ROC curve of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.90], 0.86 (95%CI: 0.77-0.92), and 0.71 (95%CI: 0.60-0.80), respectively. The mean (standard error) OM values were 0.92 (0.01), 0.93 (0.01), and 0.88 (0.02) for FibroTest, VCTE, and FIB-4, respectively; FibroTest and VCTE performed comparably, and both were superior to FIB-4 (P = 0.03 and P = 0.005). The areas under the ROC curve values for activity biomarkers were 0.86 (95%CI: 0.76-0.92) for ActiTest and 0.84 (95%CI: 0.73-0.90) for ALT (P = 0.06). The OM values for ActiTest and ALT were 0.92 (0.02) and 0.90 (0.02), respectively (P = 0.005).

Conclusion: FibroTest and VCTE outperformed FIB-4 according to the OM. FibroTest-ActiTest facilitated the evaluation of both fibrosis and activity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Hepatology
World Journal of Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信