透明质酸面部填充剂的大型前瞻性容量和患者报告的结果分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Harrison D Davis, Daniel Mazzaferro, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Charles A Messa, Ankoor A Talwar, Abhishek A Desai, Phoebe B McAuliffe, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Ivona Percec
{"title":"透明质酸面部填充剂的大型前瞻性容量和患者报告的结果分析。","authors":"Harrison D Davis, Daniel Mazzaferro, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Charles A Messa, Ankoor A Talwar, Abhishek A Desai, Phoebe B McAuliffe, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Ivona Percec","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyaluronic acid (HA) facial fillers are a non-surgical treatment for age-related changes. Literature on long-term volumetric results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is limited. This prospective study aims to precisely define and measure objective tissue metrics and PROs of HA fillers in different facial regions over 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females aged 40 to 65 received injections in facial regions using HA fillers: Restylane-L® in nasolabial folds and marionette lines, Restylane-L Lyft® in the malars, and Restylane Silk® in the lip border. Patients completed FACE-Q® questionnaires, were photographed with 3D Vectra® M3 Imaging Software pre-injection, immediately post-injection, and at 2-, 4-, and 12-weeks post-injection. Volumes were analyzed from eight regions: left, right malars and extended midface (MEM), upper perioral (UP), lower perioral and jawline (LPJ), and lips. Tissue displacement factor (TDF) and effective volume (EV) were calculated. Statistical analyses included Mann Whitney U tests and risk-adjusted linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>101 women participated. Restylane-L Lyft® had the highest TDF, 1.25, followed by Restylane-L®, 1.14, and Restylane Silk®, 0.56. EV for Restylane-L Lyft® was highest, 89.8%, followed by Restylane-L®, 89.7%, and Restylane Silk®, 70%. Volume maintenance was 65.5% (whole face), 79.2% (MEM), 62.7% (UP), and 37.2% (lips) over 12 weeks. PROs demonstrated improvements in facial appearance, treated regions, psychological and social function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We define the novel tissue metrics, TDF and EV, relative to HA treatments, with greatest volume maintenance in the midface and greatest loss around the mimetic areas throughout 12 weeks. Significantly improved PROs were observed for patients undergoing large volume HA filler injections.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Large Prospective Volumetric and Patient-Reported Outcome Analysis Of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers to the Face.\",\"authors\":\"Harrison D Davis, Daniel Mazzaferro, Theodore E Habarth-Morales, Charles A Messa, Ankoor A Talwar, Abhishek A Desai, Phoebe B McAuliffe, Robyn B Broach, Joseph M Serletti, Ivona Percec\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyaluronic acid (HA) facial fillers are a non-surgical treatment for age-related changes. Literature on long-term volumetric results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is limited. This prospective study aims to precisely define and measure objective tissue metrics and PROs of HA fillers in different facial regions over 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Females aged 40 to 65 received injections in facial regions using HA fillers: Restylane-L® in nasolabial folds and marionette lines, Restylane-L Lyft® in the malars, and Restylane Silk® in the lip border. Patients completed FACE-Q® questionnaires, were photographed with 3D Vectra® M3 Imaging Software pre-injection, immediately post-injection, and at 2-, 4-, and 12-weeks post-injection. Volumes were analyzed from eight regions: left, right malars and extended midface (MEM), upper perioral (UP), lower perioral and jawline (LPJ), and lips. Tissue displacement factor (TDF) and effective volume (EV) were calculated. Statistical analyses included Mann Whitney U tests and risk-adjusted linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>101 women participated. Restylane-L Lyft® had the highest TDF, 1.25, followed by Restylane-L®, 1.14, and Restylane Silk®, 0.56. EV for Restylane-L Lyft® was highest, 89.8%, followed by Restylane-L®, 89.7%, and Restylane Silk®, 70%. Volume maintenance was 65.5% (whole face), 79.2% (MEM), 62.7% (UP), and 37.2% (lips) over 12 weeks. PROs demonstrated improvements in facial appearance, treated regions, psychological and social function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We define the novel tissue metrics, TDF and EV, relative to HA treatments, with greatest volume maintenance in the midface and greatest loss around the mimetic areas throughout 12 weeks. Significantly improved PROs were observed for patients undergoing large volume HA filler injections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012135\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012135","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:透明质酸(HA)面部填充物是一种非手术治疗年龄相关变化的方法。关于长期容量结果和患者报告结果(PROs)的文献有限。本前瞻性研究旨在精确定义和测量12周内不同面部区域HA填充物的客观组织指标和PROs。方法:年龄在40 ~ 65岁的女性在面部区域注射透明质酸填充剂:Restylane- l®在鼻唇襞和皮线处,Restylane- l Lyft®在颧骨处,Restylane Silk®在唇缘处。患者完成FACE-Q®问卷,注射前、注射后、注射后2周、4周和12周用3D Vectra®M3成像软件拍照。分析了八个区域的体积:左、右颧和延伸中脸(MEM)、上口周线(UP)、下口周线和下颌线(LPJ)和嘴唇。计算组织位移因子(TDF)和有效体积(EV)。统计分析包括Mann Whitney U检验和风险校正线性回归。结果:101名女性参与。Restylane- l Lyft®的TDF最高,为1.25,其次是Restylane- l®,为1.14,Restylane Silk®为0.56。Restylane- l Lyft®的EV最高,为89.8%,其次是Restylane- l®,为89.7%,Restylane Silk®为70%。12周内,体积维复率为65.5%(全脸)、79.2% (MEM)、62.7% (UP)和37.2%(唇部)。PROs在面部外观、治疗部位、心理和社会功能方面表现出改善。结论:我们定义了新的组织指标,TDF和EV,相对于HA治疗,在12周内,面部中部的体积维持最大,模拟区域周围的体积损失最大。接受大容量HA填充剂注射的患者的pro明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Large Prospective Volumetric and Patient-Reported Outcome Analysis Of Hyaluronic Acid Fillers to the Face.

Background: Hyaluronic acid (HA) facial fillers are a non-surgical treatment for age-related changes. Literature on long-term volumetric results and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is limited. This prospective study aims to precisely define and measure objective tissue metrics and PROs of HA fillers in different facial regions over 12 weeks.

Methods: Females aged 40 to 65 received injections in facial regions using HA fillers: Restylane-L® in nasolabial folds and marionette lines, Restylane-L Lyft® in the malars, and Restylane Silk® in the lip border. Patients completed FACE-Q® questionnaires, were photographed with 3D Vectra® M3 Imaging Software pre-injection, immediately post-injection, and at 2-, 4-, and 12-weeks post-injection. Volumes were analyzed from eight regions: left, right malars and extended midface (MEM), upper perioral (UP), lower perioral and jawline (LPJ), and lips. Tissue displacement factor (TDF) and effective volume (EV) were calculated. Statistical analyses included Mann Whitney U tests and risk-adjusted linear regression.

Results: 101 women participated. Restylane-L Lyft® had the highest TDF, 1.25, followed by Restylane-L®, 1.14, and Restylane Silk®, 0.56. EV for Restylane-L Lyft® was highest, 89.8%, followed by Restylane-L®, 89.7%, and Restylane Silk®, 70%. Volume maintenance was 65.5% (whole face), 79.2% (MEM), 62.7% (UP), and 37.2% (lips) over 12 weeks. PROs demonstrated improvements in facial appearance, treated regions, psychological and social function.

Conclusions: We define the novel tissue metrics, TDF and EV, relative to HA treatments, with greatest volume maintenance in the midface and greatest loss around the mimetic areas throughout 12 weeks. Significantly improved PROs were observed for patients undergoing large volume HA filler injections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信