{"title":"七氟烷华盛顿与Dräger阿波罗和GE Datex Ohmeda Aisys工作站在健康儿童。","authors":"Jerrold Lerman, Ana Maria Restrepo Correa","doi":"10.1111/pan.15106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sevoflurane is preferred for induction of anesthesia in children because of its rapid wash-in and minimal airway reactivity.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the washin profiles of sevoflurane in children using the Dräger Apollo and Ohmeda Aisys workstations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four healthy children (12 per workstation) scheduled for elective surgery underwent inhalational inductions with 8% sevoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in this prospective observational study. The inspired and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations were recorded every 30 for the first 5 min and every minute thereafter until the airway was secured. Primary and secondary outcomes consisted of the derived wash-in metrics during the induction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The end-tidal to inspired ratios of sevoflurane were similar with both workstations. The mean (±SD) inspired sevoflurane concentrations with the Apollo were less than with the Aisys workstation (p < 0.013). The mean (±SD) inspired concentration at 1 min with the Apollo, 6.4% ± 0.4%, was 22% less than that with the Aisys, 7.8% ± 0.67% (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.8, p < 0.0001). The mean (±SD) maximum inspired and expired sevoflurane concentrations during the induction period with the Apollo, 7.2% ± 0.3% and 6.8% ± 0.37%, were 18% and 15% less than those with the Aisys, 8.5% ± 0.4% and 7.8% ± 0.9%, (mean difference 1.3, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.6, p < 0.0001) and (mean difference 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.6, p < 0.002) respectively. The median (25-75th percentile) time to reach 90% of the maximum inspired concentration during the induction with the Apollo, 1.75 (1-2.4) min was 3.5-fold greater than that with the Aisys, 0.5, 0.5-0.5 min (median difference -1.25, 95% CI -1.5 to -0.5, p < 0.0019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The washing of sevoflurane with the Dräger Apollo workstation is slower, and the maximum sevoflurane concentrations are less in children than with the Ohmeda Aisys workstation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"535-541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sevoflurane Washin With the Dräger Apollo and GE Datex Ohmeda Aisys Workstations in Healthy Children.\",\"authors\":\"Jerrold Lerman, Ana Maria Restrepo Correa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.15106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sevoflurane is preferred for induction of anesthesia in children because of its rapid wash-in and minimal airway reactivity.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare the washin profiles of sevoflurane in children using the Dräger Apollo and Ohmeda Aisys workstations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four healthy children (12 per workstation) scheduled for elective surgery underwent inhalational inductions with 8% sevoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in this prospective observational study. The inspired and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations were recorded every 30 for the first 5 min and every minute thereafter until the airway was secured. Primary and secondary outcomes consisted of the derived wash-in metrics during the induction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The end-tidal to inspired ratios of sevoflurane were similar with both workstations. The mean (±SD) inspired sevoflurane concentrations with the Apollo were less than with the Aisys workstation (p < 0.013). The mean (±SD) inspired concentration at 1 min with the Apollo, 6.4% ± 0.4%, was 22% less than that with the Aisys, 7.8% ± 0.67% (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.8, p < 0.0001). The mean (±SD) maximum inspired and expired sevoflurane concentrations during the induction period with the Apollo, 7.2% ± 0.3% and 6.8% ± 0.37%, were 18% and 15% less than those with the Aisys, 8.5% ± 0.4% and 7.8% ± 0.9%, (mean difference 1.3, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.6, p < 0.0001) and (mean difference 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.6, p < 0.002) respectively. The median (25-75th percentile) time to reach 90% of the maximum inspired concentration during the induction with the Apollo, 1.75 (1-2.4) min was 3.5-fold greater than that with the Aisys, 0.5, 0.5-0.5 min (median difference -1.25, 95% CI -1.5 to -0.5, p < 0.0019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The washing of sevoflurane with the Dräger Apollo workstation is slower, and the maximum sevoflurane concentrations are less in children than with the Ohmeda Aisys workstation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"535-541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15106\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.15106","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sevoflurane Washin With the Dräger Apollo and GE Datex Ohmeda Aisys Workstations in Healthy Children.
Background: Sevoflurane is preferred for induction of anesthesia in children because of its rapid wash-in and minimal airway reactivity.
Aims: The primary aim of this study was to compare the washin profiles of sevoflurane in children using the Dräger Apollo and Ohmeda Aisys workstations.
Methods: Twenty-four healthy children (12 per workstation) scheduled for elective surgery underwent inhalational inductions with 8% sevoflurane and 66% nitrous oxide in this prospective observational study. The inspired and end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations were recorded every 30 for the first 5 min and every minute thereafter until the airway was secured. Primary and secondary outcomes consisted of the derived wash-in metrics during the induction.
Results: The end-tidal to inspired ratios of sevoflurane were similar with both workstations. The mean (±SD) inspired sevoflurane concentrations with the Apollo were less than with the Aisys workstation (p < 0.013). The mean (±SD) inspired concentration at 1 min with the Apollo, 6.4% ± 0.4%, was 22% less than that with the Aisys, 7.8% ± 0.67% (mean difference 1.4, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.8, p < 0.0001). The mean (±SD) maximum inspired and expired sevoflurane concentrations during the induction period with the Apollo, 7.2% ± 0.3% and 6.8% ± 0.37%, were 18% and 15% less than those with the Aisys, 8.5% ± 0.4% and 7.8% ± 0.9%, (mean difference 1.3, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.6, p < 0.0001) and (mean difference 1.01, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.6, p < 0.002) respectively. The median (25-75th percentile) time to reach 90% of the maximum inspired concentration during the induction with the Apollo, 1.75 (1-2.4) min was 3.5-fold greater than that with the Aisys, 0.5, 0.5-0.5 min (median difference -1.25, 95% CI -1.5 to -0.5, p < 0.0019).
Conclusions: The washing of sevoflurane with the Dräger Apollo workstation is slower, and the maximum sevoflurane concentrations are less in children than with the Ohmeda Aisys workstation.
期刊介绍：
Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
