植入式除颤器:哪个是对每个病人最好的设备?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Graham Peigh, Bradley P Knight
{"title":"植入式除颤器:哪个是对每个病人最好的设备?","authors":"Graham Peigh, Bradley P Knight","doi":"10.1111/jce.16646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first viable alternative to surgical implantation of an epicardial defibrillator system for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) was a single chamber transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Thanks to technological advancements over the past 40 years, electrophysiologists now have several options when determining the optimal type of ICD to provide protection against SCD, including the number of leads implanted, whether a patient meets indications for cardiac resynchronization, and if the patient would benefit from an extravascular device. In this review, we will detail the breadth of options for commercially available ICD therapy to provide guidance on which device is best suited for specific patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implantable Defibrillators: Which Is the Best Device for Each Patient?\",\"authors\":\"Graham Peigh, Bradley P Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.16646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The first viable alternative to surgical implantation of an epicardial defibrillator system for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) was a single chamber transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Thanks to technological advancements over the past 40 years, electrophysiologists now have several options when determining the optimal type of ICD to provide protection against SCD, including the number of leads implanted, whether a patient meets indications for cardiac resynchronization, and if the patient would benefit from an extravascular device. In this review, we will detail the breadth of options for commercially available ICD therapy to provide guidance on which device is best suited for specific patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16646\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一个可行的替代手术植入心外膜除颤器系统二级预防心源性猝死(SCD)是单室经静脉植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)。由于过去40年的技术进步,电生理学家现在在确定ICD的最佳类型以提供防止SCD的保护时有几种选择,包括植入的导联数量,患者是否符合心脏再同步的指征,以及患者是否会从血管外装置中受益。在这篇综述中,我们将详细介绍商用ICD治疗的选择范围,以指导哪种设备最适合特定的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implantable Defibrillators: Which Is the Best Device for Each Patient?

The first viable alternative to surgical implantation of an epicardial defibrillator system for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) was a single chamber transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Thanks to technological advancements over the past 40 years, electrophysiologists now have several options when determining the optimal type of ICD to provide protection against SCD, including the number of leads implanted, whether a patient meets indications for cardiac resynchronization, and if the patient would benefit from an extravascular device. In this review, we will detail the breadth of options for commercially available ICD therapy to provide guidance on which device is best suited for specific patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信