James D Chambers, Molly T Beinfeld, Terry Richardson, Michael Pangrace
{"title":"评估美国支付人对抗血管内皮生长因子治疗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病性黄斑水肿覆盖范围的差异。","authors":"James D Chambers, Molly T Beinfeld, Terry Richardson, Michael Pangrace","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended to preserve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Coverage of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinal diseases varies, resulting in administrative burdens for providers and treatment delays for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how US commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans cover anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of retinal diseases using information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive study evaluated coverage of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF drugs for AMD, DR, and DME current as of April 2024 using the Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database from 18 of the largest US commercial health plans and MA offerings from a subset of 6 of these plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial variation exists in commercial coverage across FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapies for AMD, DR, and DME. Descriptive assessment showed that approximately 65% of commercial coverage decisions and approximately 52% of MA decisions included restrictions beyond the FDA label. Coverage decisions for originator products were more likely to include restrictions compared with those for biosimilar products. Step therapy protocols were found in up to 75% of plans but were variable by drug, with most requiring a first-line trial of bevacizumab. Evidence cited to support coverage restrictions was likewise variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Descriptive data show that US commercial and MA coverage and step therapy protocols vary substantially across health plans, which may potentially contribute to administrative burdens and treatment delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing variation in US payer coverage of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema.\",\"authors\":\"James D Chambers, Molly T Beinfeld, Terry Richardson, Michael Pangrace\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended to preserve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Coverage of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinal diseases varies, resulting in administrative burdens for providers and treatment delays for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how US commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans cover anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of retinal diseases using information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive study evaluated coverage of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF drugs for AMD, DR, and DME current as of April 2024 using the Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database from 18 of the largest US commercial health plans and MA offerings from a subset of 6 of these plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial variation exists in commercial coverage across FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapies for AMD, DR, and DME. Descriptive assessment showed that approximately 65% of commercial coverage decisions and approximately 52% of MA decisions included restrictions beyond the FDA label. Coverage decisions for originator products were more likely to include restrictions compared with those for biosimilar products. Step therapy protocols were found in up to 75% of plans but were variable by drug, with most requiring a first-line trial of bevacizumab. Evidence cited to support coverage restrictions was likewise variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Descriptive data show that US commercial and MA coverage and step therapy protocols vary substantially across health plans, which may potentially contribute to administrative burdens and treatment delays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing variation in US payer coverage of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema.
Background: Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended to preserve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Coverage of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinal diseases varies, resulting in administrative burdens for providers and treatment delays for patients.
Objective: To examine how US commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans cover anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of retinal diseases using information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database.
Methods: This descriptive study evaluated coverage of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF drugs for AMD, DR, and DME current as of April 2024 using the Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database from 18 of the largest US commercial health plans and MA offerings from a subset of 6 of these plans.
Results: Substantial variation exists in commercial coverage across FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapies for AMD, DR, and DME. Descriptive assessment showed that approximately 65% of commercial coverage decisions and approximately 52% of MA decisions included restrictions beyond the FDA label. Coverage decisions for originator products were more likely to include restrictions compared with those for biosimilar products. Step therapy protocols were found in up to 75% of plans but were variable by drug, with most requiring a first-line trial of bevacizumab. Evidence cited to support coverage restrictions was likewise variable.
Conclusions: Descriptive data show that US commercial and MA coverage and step therapy protocols vary substantially across health plans, which may potentially contribute to administrative burdens and treatment delays.
期刊介绍:
JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.