评估美国支付人对抗血管内皮生长因子治疗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病性黄斑水肿覆盖范围的差异。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
James D Chambers, Molly T Beinfeld, Terry Richardson, Michael Pangrace
{"title":"评估美国支付人对抗血管内皮生长因子治疗治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病性黄斑水肿覆盖范围的差异。","authors":"James D Chambers, Molly T Beinfeld, Terry Richardson, Michael Pangrace","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended to preserve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Coverage of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinal diseases varies, resulting in administrative burdens for providers and treatment delays for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how US commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans cover anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of retinal diseases using information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive study evaluated coverage of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF drugs for AMD, DR, and DME current as of April 2024 using the Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database from 18 of the largest US commercial health plans and MA offerings from a subset of 6 of these plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial variation exists in commercial coverage across FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapies for AMD, DR, and DME. Descriptive assessment showed that approximately 65% of commercial coverage decisions and approximately 52% of MA decisions included restrictions beyond the FDA label. Coverage decisions for originator products were more likely to include restrictions compared with those for biosimilar products. Step therapy protocols were found in up to 75% of plans but were variable by drug, with most requiring a first-line trial of bevacizumab. Evidence cited to support coverage restrictions was likewise variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Descriptive data show that US commercial and MA coverage and step therapy protocols vary substantially across health plans, which may potentially contribute to administrative burdens and treatment delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing variation in US payer coverage of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema.\",\"authors\":\"James D Chambers, Molly T Beinfeld, Terry Richardson, Michael Pangrace\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended to preserve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Coverage of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinal diseases varies, resulting in administrative burdens for providers and treatment delays for patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how US commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans cover anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of retinal diseases using information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive study evaluated coverage of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF drugs for AMD, DR, and DME current as of April 2024 using the Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database from 18 of the largest US commercial health plans and MA offerings from a subset of 6 of these plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial variation exists in commercial coverage across FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapies for AMD, DR, and DME. Descriptive assessment showed that approximately 65% of commercial coverage decisions and approximately 52% of MA decisions included restrictions beyond the FDA label. Coverage decisions for originator products were more likely to include restrictions compared with those for biosimilar products. Step therapy protocols were found in up to 75% of plans but were variable by drug, with most requiring a first-line trial of bevacizumab. Evidence cited to support coverage restrictions was likewise variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Descriptive data show that US commercial and MA coverage and step therapy protocols vary substantially across health plans, which may potentially contribute to administrative burdens and treatment delays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.24340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:建议对老年性黄斑变性(AMD)、糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者及时进行抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)治疗,以保护视力。治疗视网膜疾病的抗血管内皮生长因子药物的承保范围各不相同,导致医疗服务提供者的行政负担和患者的治疗延误:利用塔夫茨医学中心专业药物证据和覆盖范围数据库中的信息,研究美国商业和医疗保险优势(MA)健康计划如何覆盖治疗视网膜疾病的抗血管内皮生长因子疗法:这项描述性研究利用美国最大的 18 家商业医疗保险计划和其中 6 家医疗保险计划的子集所提供的特药证据和承保范围数据库,评估了截至 2024 年 4 月美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 批准的治疗 AMD、DR 和 DME 的抗血管内皮生长因子药物的承保范围:结果:FDA 批准的治疗 AMD、DR 和 DME 的抗血管内皮生长因子疗法的商业覆盖范围存在很大差异。描述性评估显示,约 65% 的商业承保决定和约 52% 的医疗保险决定包含超出 FDA 标签的限制。与生物仿制药相比,原研产品的承保决定更有可能包含限制条款。多达 75% 的计划中都有阶梯治疗方案,但因药物而异,大多数计划要求贝伐珠单抗的一线试验。支持覆盖限制的证据也同样各不相同:描述性数据显示,美国商业和医疗保险的承保范围以及阶梯疗法方案在不同的医疗保险计划中存在很大差异,这可能会造成行政负担和治疗延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing variation in US payer coverage of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema.

Background: Timely anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is recommended to preserve vision in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy (DR), and diabetic macular edema (DME). Coverage of anti-VEGF agents for the treatment of retinal diseases varies, resulting in administrative burdens for providers and treatment delays for patients.

Objective: To examine how US commercial and Medicare Advantage (MA) health plans cover anti-VEGF therapies for the treatment of retinal diseases using information from the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database.

Methods: This descriptive study evaluated coverage of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-VEGF drugs for AMD, DR, and DME current as of April 2024 using the Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database from 18 of the largest US commercial health plans and MA offerings from a subset of 6 of these plans.

Results: Substantial variation exists in commercial coverage across FDA-approved anti-VEGF therapies for AMD, DR, and DME. Descriptive assessment showed that approximately 65% of commercial coverage decisions and approximately 52% of MA decisions included restrictions beyond the FDA label. Coverage decisions for originator products were more likely to include restrictions compared with those for biosimilar products. Step therapy protocols were found in up to 75% of plans but were variable by drug, with most requiring a first-line trial of bevacizumab. Evidence cited to support coverage restrictions was likewise variable.

Conclusions: Descriptive data show that US commercial and MA coverage and step therapy protocols vary substantially across health plans, which may potentially contribute to administrative burdens and treatment delays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信