基于患者风险的PBRTQC集成系统提高临床实验室质量控制效率。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Xincen Duan, Tony Badrick, Wenqi Shao, Andreas Bietenbeck, Xiao Tan, Jing Zhu, Wenhai Jiang, Ying Zhao, Chunyan Zhang, Baishen Pan, Beili Wang, Wei Guo
{"title":"基于患者风险的PBRTQC集成系统提高临床实验室质量控制效率。","authors":"Xincen Duan, Tony Badrick, Wenqi Shao, Andreas Bietenbeck, Xiao Tan, Jing Zhu, Wenhai Jiang, Ying Zhao, Chunyan Zhang, Baishen Pan, Beili Wang, Wei Guo","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent advances in information technology have renewed interest in patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) as an alternative to internal quality control (IQC). However, since regulations mandate IQC, PBRTQC can only be implemented as a separate system. The additional labor required for PBRTQC may hinder widespread adoption. Therefore, a more efficient system that integrates IQC with PBRTQC is needed for laboratories to implement the methods effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A QC system that integrates IQC with PBRTQC is proposed. The maximum average number of patients with unacceptable analytical errors (MaxANP<sub>TE</sub>) was introduced as a critical metric to benchmark the efficiency of the integrated PBRTQC system against the IQC-only system using a modified Parvin patient risk model. With the historical data of serum sodium (Na), chloride (Cl), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine (CREA) from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, in 2019, the integrated system incorporating the simple PBRTQC model and the more advanced regression-adjusted real-time quality control (RARTQC) were compared with the IQC-only system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most cases, the integrated system incorporating RARTQC models outperformed the IQC-only system, particularly for ALT, where QC events were reduced by up to 45 %. Based on these findings, we proposed strategies for laboratories to design the integrated system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated the improvement of efficiency of the integrated PBRTQC system over the IQC-only system. These insights can help laboratories make informed decisions on adopting PBRTQC models and provide as evidence for revising regulation on IQC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the efficiency of quality control in clinical laboratory with an integrated PBRTQC system based on patient risk.\",\"authors\":\"Xincen Duan, Tony Badrick, Wenqi Shao, Andreas Bietenbeck, Xiao Tan, Jing Zhu, Wenhai Jiang, Ying Zhao, Chunyan Zhang, Baishen Pan, Beili Wang, Wei Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent advances in information technology have renewed interest in patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) as an alternative to internal quality control (IQC). However, since regulations mandate IQC, PBRTQC can only be implemented as a separate system. The additional labor required for PBRTQC may hinder widespread adoption. Therefore, a more efficient system that integrates IQC with PBRTQC is needed for laboratories to implement the methods effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A QC system that integrates IQC with PBRTQC is proposed. The maximum average number of patients with unacceptable analytical errors (MaxANP<sub>TE</sub>) was introduced as a critical metric to benchmark the efficiency of the integrated PBRTQC system against the IQC-only system using a modified Parvin patient risk model. With the historical data of serum sodium (Na), chloride (Cl), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine (CREA) from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, in 2019, the integrated system incorporating the simple PBRTQC model and the more advanced regression-adjusted real-time quality control (RARTQC) were compared with the IQC-only system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In most cases, the integrated system incorporating RARTQC models outperformed the IQC-only system, particularly for ALT, where QC events were reduced by up to 45 %. Based on these findings, we proposed strategies for laboratories to design the integrated system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated the improvement of efficiency of the integrated PBRTQC system over the IQC-only system. These insights can help laboratories make informed decisions on adopting PBRTQC models and provide as evidence for revising regulation on IQC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0163\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:信息技术的最新进展重新引起了人们对基于患者的实时质量控制(PBRTQC)作为内部质量控制(IQC)的替代方案的兴趣。然而,由于法规要求IQC, PBRTQC只能作为一个单独的系统来实施。PBRTQC所需的额外劳动力可能会阻碍广泛采用。因此,实验室需要一个将IQC与PBRTQC相结合的更高效的系统来有效地实施这些方法。方法:提出了IQC与PBRTQC相结合的质量控制系统。采用改进的Parvin患者风险模型,引入不可接受分析错误患者的最大平均人数(MaxANPTE)作为综合PBRTQC系统与仅iqc系统的效率基准的关键指标。利用复旦大学中山医院2019年血清钠(Na)、氯(Cl)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、肌酐(CREA)的历史数据,比较采用简单PBRTQC模型和更先进的回归校正实时质量控制(RARTQC)的综合系统与仅采用iqc的系统。结果:在大多数情况下,结合RARTQC模型的综合系统优于仅使用iqc的系统,特别是对于ALT,其中QC事件减少高达45% %。基于这些发现,我们提出了实验室设计集成系统的策略。结论:本研究表明综合PBRTQC系统比单一iqc系统的效率有所提高。这些见解可以帮助实验室在采用PBRTQC模型方面做出明智的决定,并为修订IQC法规提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the efficiency of quality control in clinical laboratory with an integrated PBRTQC system based on patient risk.

Objectives: Recent advances in information technology have renewed interest in patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) as an alternative to internal quality control (IQC). However, since regulations mandate IQC, PBRTQC can only be implemented as a separate system. The additional labor required for PBRTQC may hinder widespread adoption. Therefore, a more efficient system that integrates IQC with PBRTQC is needed for laboratories to implement the methods effectively.

Methods: A QC system that integrates IQC with PBRTQC is proposed. The maximum average number of patients with unacceptable analytical errors (MaxANPTE) was introduced as a critical metric to benchmark the efficiency of the integrated PBRTQC system against the IQC-only system using a modified Parvin patient risk model. With the historical data of serum sodium (Na), chloride (Cl), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and creatinine (CREA) from Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, in 2019, the integrated system incorporating the simple PBRTQC model and the more advanced regression-adjusted real-time quality control (RARTQC) were compared with the IQC-only system.

Results: In most cases, the integrated system incorporating RARTQC models outperformed the IQC-only system, particularly for ALT, where QC events were reduced by up to 45 %. Based on these findings, we proposed strategies for laboratories to design the integrated system.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated the improvement of efficiency of the integrated PBRTQC system over the IQC-only system. These insights can help laboratories make informed decisions on adopting PBRTQC models and provide as evidence for revising regulation on IQC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信