{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间阑尾炎的严重程度:单一机构的经验。","authors":"Nathaniel Harshaw, Kameron Durante, Katherine Moore, Kellie Bresz, Alexis Campbell, Lindsey L Perea","doi":"10.1177/00031348251332688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic led to nationwide stay at home orders, leading to delays in medical care. We sought to identify if the severity of appendicitis changed during the pandemic due to these delays and if there were differences in appendicitis severity in patients with simultaneous COVID-19 infection. We hypothesized that pandemic-related restrictions led to more severe cases of appendicitis.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study (4/2018-4/2022) of all patients ≥ 5y with appendicitis. Patients with a malignant appendiceal specimen were excluded. Clinical outcomes and characteristics were compared in those with appendicitis prior to the COVID-19 (PC) era to those in the COVID-19 (C) era, as well as between COVID-19 positive (C+) and negative (C-) individuals. Univariate analyses were conducted. A <i>P</i>-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1665 patients met inclusion criteria, 806 (48.4%) in PC era, and 859 (51.6%) in C era. Age and gender did not differ from PC era to C era, nor did they differ from the C- group to the C+ group. The C era had significantly higher 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 6.29% (n = 54) v. PC 2.73% (n = 22), <i>P</i> = 0.001). The C era also had more greater than 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 3.26% (n = 28) v. PC 1.74% (n = 14), <i>P</i> = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the reason for 30-day or greater than 30-day readmissions for the PC vs C eras. Of the C era, 833 (97.0%) were C- and 26 (3.0%) were C+. Rates of nonoperative management at index admission were not different between groups. The white blood cell (WBC) count was significantly lower in C+, 11.9 (8.55-13.35 IQR), vs C- group, 12.85 (9.9-15.3 IQR), <i>P</i> = 0.0336. There was no significant difference in the severity of appendicitis nor readmission status in C+ vs C- groups during the C era.ConclusionOur data indicates that the PC era had more severe cases of appendicitis as shown by higher rates of perforated and gangrenous appendicitis on pathology reports compared to the C era. Interestingly, readmissions were more prevalent in the C era as opposed to the PC era, which coincided with an increase in complications requiring readmission following laparoscopic appendectomies. In evaluating appendicitis patients according to COVID-19 status, we saw no significant differences in the severity of appendicitis in C- and C+ individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251332688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Severity of Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Institution Experience.\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel Harshaw, Kameron Durante, Katherine Moore, Kellie Bresz, Alexis Campbell, Lindsey L Perea\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251332688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic led to nationwide stay at home orders, leading to delays in medical care. We sought to identify if the severity of appendicitis changed during the pandemic due to these delays and if there were differences in appendicitis severity in patients with simultaneous COVID-19 infection. We hypothesized that pandemic-related restrictions led to more severe cases of appendicitis.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study (4/2018-4/2022) of all patients ≥ 5y with appendicitis. Patients with a malignant appendiceal specimen were excluded. Clinical outcomes and characteristics were compared in those with appendicitis prior to the COVID-19 (PC) era to those in the COVID-19 (C) era, as well as between COVID-19 positive (C+) and negative (C-) individuals. Univariate analyses were conducted. A <i>P</i>-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1665 patients met inclusion criteria, 806 (48.4%) in PC era, and 859 (51.6%) in C era. Age and gender did not differ from PC era to C era, nor did they differ from the C- group to the C+ group. The C era had significantly higher 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 6.29% (n = 54) v. PC 2.73% (n = 22), <i>P</i> = 0.001). The C era also had more greater than 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 3.26% (n = 28) v. PC 1.74% (n = 14), <i>P</i> = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the reason for 30-day or greater than 30-day readmissions for the PC vs C eras. Of the C era, 833 (97.0%) were C- and 26 (3.0%) were C+. Rates of nonoperative management at index admission were not different between groups. The white blood cell (WBC) count was significantly lower in C+, 11.9 (8.55-13.35 IQR), vs C- group, 12.85 (9.9-15.3 IQR), <i>P</i> = 0.0336. There was no significant difference in the severity of appendicitis nor readmission status in C+ vs C- groups during the C era.ConclusionOur data indicates that the PC era had more severe cases of appendicitis as shown by higher rates of perforated and gangrenous appendicitis on pathology reports compared to the C era. Interestingly, readmissions were more prevalent in the C era as opposed to the PC era, which coincided with an increase in complications requiring readmission following laparoscopic appendectomies. In evaluating appendicitis patients according to COVID-19 status, we saw no significant differences in the severity of appendicitis in C- and C+ individuals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"31348251332688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251332688\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251332688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2019冠状病毒病大流行导致全国范围内的居家令,导致医疗延误。我们试图确定在大流行期间阑尾炎的严重程度是否因这些延迟而改变,以及同时感染COVID-19的患者的阑尾炎严重程度是否存在差异。我们假设与大流行相关的限制导致了更严重的阑尾炎病例。方法回顾性研究(2018年4月- 2022年4月)所有≥5y的阑尾炎患者。阑尾肿瘤标本排除在外。比较COVID-19 (PC)时代前阑尾炎患者与COVID-19 (C)时代阑尾炎患者以及COVID-19阳性(C+)和阴性(C-)患者的临床结局和特征。进行单因素分析。P值P = 0.001)。C组再入院时间大于30天的患者多于PC组(C组3.26% (n = 28) vs . PC组1.74% (n = 14), P = 0.048)。在30天或超过30天的再入院原因上,PC和C时代没有显著差异。C时代,833例(97.0%)为C-, 26例(3.0%)为C+。两组间非手术治疗率无显著差异。C+组白细胞计数为11.9 (8.55 ~ 13.35 IQR),显著低于C-组12.85 (9.9 ~ 15.3 IQR), P = 0.0336。C+组与C-组在C时代阑尾炎的严重程度和再入院情况无显著差异。结论与C时代相比,PC时代的阑尾炎病例更为严重,病理报告中阑尾炎穿孔和坏疽的发生率更高。有趣的是,与PC时代相比,C时代的再入院更为普遍,这与腹腔镜阑尾切除术后需要再入院的并发症增加相吻合。在根据COVID-19状态评估阑尾炎患者时,我们发现C-和C+个体阑尾炎的严重程度无显著差异。
The Severity of Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Institution Experience.
IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic led to nationwide stay at home orders, leading to delays in medical care. We sought to identify if the severity of appendicitis changed during the pandemic due to these delays and if there were differences in appendicitis severity in patients with simultaneous COVID-19 infection. We hypothesized that pandemic-related restrictions led to more severe cases of appendicitis.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study (4/2018-4/2022) of all patients ≥ 5y with appendicitis. Patients with a malignant appendiceal specimen were excluded. Clinical outcomes and characteristics were compared in those with appendicitis prior to the COVID-19 (PC) era to those in the COVID-19 (C) era, as well as between COVID-19 positive (C+) and negative (C-) individuals. Univariate analyses were conducted. A P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultsA total of 1665 patients met inclusion criteria, 806 (48.4%) in PC era, and 859 (51.6%) in C era. Age and gender did not differ from PC era to C era, nor did they differ from the C- group to the C+ group. The C era had significantly higher 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 6.29% (n = 54) v. PC 2.73% (n = 22), P = 0.001). The C era also had more greater than 30-day readmissions than the PC era (C 3.26% (n = 28) v. PC 1.74% (n = 14), P = 0.048). There was no significant difference in the reason for 30-day or greater than 30-day readmissions for the PC vs C eras. Of the C era, 833 (97.0%) were C- and 26 (3.0%) were C+. Rates of nonoperative management at index admission were not different between groups. The white blood cell (WBC) count was significantly lower in C+, 11.9 (8.55-13.35 IQR), vs C- group, 12.85 (9.9-15.3 IQR), P = 0.0336. There was no significant difference in the severity of appendicitis nor readmission status in C+ vs C- groups during the C era.ConclusionOur data indicates that the PC era had more severe cases of appendicitis as shown by higher rates of perforated and gangrenous appendicitis on pathology reports compared to the C era. Interestingly, readmissions were more prevalent in the C era as opposed to the PC era, which coincided with an increase in complications requiring readmission following laparoscopic appendectomies. In evaluating appendicitis patients according to COVID-19 status, we saw no significant differences in the severity of appendicitis in C- and C+ individuals.
期刊介绍:
The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.