Aurelien-Xuan Rosendal Bahuet, Mathias Therkel Steensbæk, Rasmus Linnebjerg Knudsen, Sina Yousef, Rikke Helene Frølund Bjulf, Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Anders Kehlet Nørskov
{"title":"随机对照试验中术前周围神经阻滞的测试:一项范围审查方案。","authors":"Aurelien-Xuan Rosendal Bahuet, Mathias Therkel Steensbæk, Rasmus Linnebjerg Knudsen, Sina Yousef, Rikke Helene Frølund Bjulf, Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Anders Kehlet Nørskov","doi":"10.1111/aas.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve blocks are widely used for anaesthesia in upper or lower limb surgery, but the methods used to assess their success vary substantially across randomised controlled trials. Standardised reporting of how peripheral nerve blocks are tested and how success is defined is essential for ensuring the validity and comparability of clinical research and correct clinical implementation of nerve blocks. This scoping review aims to map existing research practices and assess the extent to which trials provide reporting on peripheral nerve block evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will adhere to guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search will be conducted on the PubMed database for trials published in peer-reviewed journals of anaesthesia from 2014 onward. An online tool will be used for screening and data extraction. Outcomes include the proportion of trials that report whether peripheral nerve blocks were tested, describe testing methods, define successful blocks, and report success rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the review will be presented descriptively and with tables where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol outlines a review exploring variability in the reporting of methods used to test peripheral nerve blocks. It aims to assist with the interpretation of clinical trials and possibly guide future research to facilitate comparison of findings between clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 5","pages":"e70032"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing of pre-operative peripheral nerve blocks in randomised controlled trials: A scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Aurelien-Xuan Rosendal Bahuet, Mathias Therkel Steensbæk, Rasmus Linnebjerg Knudsen, Sina Yousef, Rikke Helene Frølund Bjulf, Anne-Sofie Linde Jellestad, Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange, Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm, Anders Kehlet Nørskov\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral nerve blocks are widely used for anaesthesia in upper or lower limb surgery, but the methods used to assess their success vary substantially across randomised controlled trials. Standardised reporting of how peripheral nerve blocks are tested and how success is defined is essential for ensuring the validity and comparability of clinical research and correct clinical implementation of nerve blocks. This scoping review aims to map existing research practices and assess the extent to which trials provide reporting on peripheral nerve block evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review will adhere to guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search will be conducted on the PubMed database for trials published in peer-reviewed journals of anaesthesia from 2014 onward. An online tool will be used for screening and data extraction. Outcomes include the proportion of trials that report whether peripheral nerve blocks were tested, describe testing methods, define successful blocks, and report success rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the review will be presented descriptively and with tables where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This protocol outlines a review exploring variability in the reporting of methods used to test peripheral nerve blocks. It aims to assist with the interpretation of clinical trials and possibly guide future research to facilitate comparison of findings between clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"e70032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965968/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing of pre-operative peripheral nerve blocks in randomised controlled trials: A scoping review protocol.
Background: Peripheral nerve blocks are widely used for anaesthesia in upper or lower limb surgery, but the methods used to assess their success vary substantially across randomised controlled trials. Standardised reporting of how peripheral nerve blocks are tested and how success is defined is essential for ensuring the validity and comparability of clinical research and correct clinical implementation of nerve blocks. This scoping review aims to map existing research practices and assess the extent to which trials provide reporting on peripheral nerve block evaluation.
Methods: This scoping review will adhere to guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A comprehensive search will be conducted on the PubMed database for trials published in peer-reviewed journals of anaesthesia from 2014 onward. An online tool will be used for screening and data extraction. Outcomes include the proportion of trials that report whether peripheral nerve blocks were tested, describe testing methods, define successful blocks, and report success rates.
Results: The results of the review will be presented descriptively and with tables where appropriate.
Conclusion: This protocol outlines a review exploring variability in the reporting of methods used to test peripheral nerve blocks. It aims to assist with the interpretation of clinical trials and possibly guide future research to facilitate comparison of findings between clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.