心脏骤停复苏后持续深度镇静vs最小镇静(SED-CARE):一项随机临床试验的方案。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A Ceric, J Dankiewicz, J Hästbacka, P Young, V H Niemelä, F Bass, M B Skrifvars, N Hammond, M Saxena, H Levin, G Lilja, M Moseby-Knappe, M Tiainen, M Reinikainen, J Holgersson, C B Kamp, M P Wise, P J McGuigan, J White, K Sweet, T R Keeble, G Glover, P Hopkins, C Remmington, J M Cole, N Gorgoraptis, D G Pogson, P Jackson, J Düring, A Lybeck, J Johnsson, J Unden, A Lundin, J Kåhlin, J Grip, E M Lotman, L Romundstad, P Seidel, P Stammet, T Graf, A Mengel, C Leithner, J Nee, P Druwé, K Ameloot, A Nichol, M Haenggi, M P Hilty, M Iten, C Schrag, M Nafi, M Joannidis, C Robba, T Pellis, J Belohlavek, D Rob, Y M Arabi, S Buabbas, C Yew Woon, A Aneman, A Stewart, M Reade, C Delcourt, A Delaney, M Ramanan, B Venkatesh, L Navarra, B Crichton, A Williams, D Knight, J Tirkkonen, T Oksanen, T Kaakinen, S Bendel, H Friberg, T Cronberg, J C Jakobsen, N Nielsen
{"title":"心脏骤停复苏后持续深度镇静vs最小镇静(SED-CARE):一项随机临床试验的方案。","authors":"A Ceric, J Dankiewicz, J Hästbacka, P Young, V H Niemelä, F Bass, M B Skrifvars, N Hammond, M Saxena, H Levin, G Lilja, M Moseby-Knappe, M Tiainen, M Reinikainen, J Holgersson, C B Kamp, M P Wise, P J McGuigan, J White, K Sweet, T R Keeble, G Glover, P Hopkins, C Remmington, J M Cole, N Gorgoraptis, D G Pogson, P Jackson, J Düring, A Lybeck, J Johnsson, J Unden, A Lundin, J Kåhlin, J Grip, E M Lotman, L Romundstad, P Seidel, P Stammet, T Graf, A Mengel, C Leithner, J Nee, P Druwé, K Ameloot, A Nichol, M Haenggi, M P Hilty, M Iten, C Schrag, M Nafi, M Joannidis, C Robba, T Pellis, J Belohlavek, D Rob, Y M Arabi, S Buabbas, C Yew Woon, A Aneman, A Stewart, M Reade, C Delcourt, A Delaney, M Ramanan, B Venkatesh, L Navarra, B Crichton, A Williams, D Knight, J Tirkkonen, T Oksanen, T Kaakinen, S Bendel, H Friberg, T Cronberg, J C Jakobsen, N Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/aas.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedation is often provided to resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to tolerate post-cardiac arrest care, including temperature management. However, the evidence of benefit or harm from routinely administered deep sedation after cardiac arrest is limited. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effects of continuous deep sedation compared to minimal sedation on patient-important outcomes in resuscitated OHCA patients in a large clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SED-CARE trial is part of the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial Sedation, Temperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (STEPCARE) trial, a randomized international, multicentre, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, superiority trial with three simultaneous intervention arms. In the SED-CARE trial, adults with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who are comatose following resuscitation from OHCA will be randomized within 4 hours to continuous deep sedation (Richmond agitation and sedation scale (RASS) -4/-5) (intervention) or minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) (comparator), for 36 h after ROSC. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 6 months after randomization. The two other components of the STEPCARE trial evaluate sedation and temperature control strategies. Apart from the STEPCARE trial interventions, all other aspects of general intensive care will be according to the local practices of the participating site. Neurological prognostication will be performed according to European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines by a physician blinded to the allocation group. To detect an absolute risk reduction of 5.6% with an alpha of 0.05, 90% power, 3500 participants will be enrolled. The secondary outcomes will be the proportion of participants with poor functional outcomes 6 months after randomization, serious adverse events in the intensive care unit, and patient-reported overall health status 6 months after randomization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SED-CARE trial will investigate if continuous deep sedation (RASS -4/-5) for 36 h confers a mortality benefit compared to minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) after cardiac arrest.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 5","pages":"e70022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous deep sedation versus minimal sedation after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (SED-CARE): A protocol for a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"A Ceric, J Dankiewicz, J Hästbacka, P Young, V H Niemelä, F Bass, M B Skrifvars, N Hammond, M Saxena, H Levin, G Lilja, M Moseby-Knappe, M Tiainen, M Reinikainen, J Holgersson, C B Kamp, M P Wise, P J McGuigan, J White, K Sweet, T R Keeble, G Glover, P Hopkins, C Remmington, J M Cole, N Gorgoraptis, D G Pogson, P Jackson, J Düring, A Lybeck, J Johnsson, J Unden, A Lundin, J Kåhlin, J Grip, E M Lotman, L Romundstad, P Seidel, P Stammet, T Graf, A Mengel, C Leithner, J Nee, P Druwé, K Ameloot, A Nichol, M Haenggi, M P Hilty, M Iten, C Schrag, M Nafi, M Joannidis, C Robba, T Pellis, J Belohlavek, D Rob, Y M Arabi, S Buabbas, C Yew Woon, A Aneman, A Stewart, M Reade, C Delcourt, A Delaney, M Ramanan, B Venkatesh, L Navarra, B Crichton, A Williams, D Knight, J Tirkkonen, T Oksanen, T Kaakinen, S Bendel, H Friberg, T Cronberg, J C Jakobsen, N Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aas.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sedation is often provided to resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to tolerate post-cardiac arrest care, including temperature management. However, the evidence of benefit or harm from routinely administered deep sedation after cardiac arrest is limited. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effects of continuous deep sedation compared to minimal sedation on patient-important outcomes in resuscitated OHCA patients in a large clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SED-CARE trial is part of the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial Sedation, Temperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (STEPCARE) trial, a randomized international, multicentre, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, superiority trial with three simultaneous intervention arms. In the SED-CARE trial, adults with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who are comatose following resuscitation from OHCA will be randomized within 4 hours to continuous deep sedation (Richmond agitation and sedation scale (RASS) -4/-5) (intervention) or minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) (comparator), for 36 h after ROSC. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 6 months after randomization. The two other components of the STEPCARE trial evaluate sedation and temperature control strategies. Apart from the STEPCARE trial interventions, all other aspects of general intensive care will be according to the local practices of the participating site. Neurological prognostication will be performed according to European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines by a physician blinded to the allocation group. To detect an absolute risk reduction of 5.6% with an alpha of 0.05, 90% power, 3500 participants will be enrolled. The secondary outcomes will be the proportion of participants with poor functional outcomes 6 months after randomization, serious adverse events in the intensive care unit, and patient-reported overall health status 6 months after randomization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SED-CARE trial will investigate if continuous deep sedation (RASS -4/-5) for 36 h confers a mortality benefit compared to minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) after cardiac arrest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"69 5\",\"pages\":\"e70022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967157/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)复苏患者通常给予镇静,以耐受心脏骤停后护理,包括温度管理。然而,心脏骤停后常规给予深度镇静的益处或危害的证据有限。本试验的目的是在一项大型临床试验中,研究持续深度镇静与最小程度镇静对复苏OHCA患者重要预后的影响。方法:SED-CARE试验是2 × 2 × 2因子心脏骤停和复苏后镇静、温度和压力(STEPCARE)试验的一部分,该试验是一项随机国际、多中心、平行组、研究者发起的优势试验,有三个同时干预组。在SED-CARE试验中,在OHCA复苏后处于昏迷状态的持续自主循环恢复(ROSC)的成人将在4小时内随机分配到持续深度镇静(Richmond激动和镇静量表(RASS) -4/-5)(干预)或最小镇静(RASS 0至-2)(比较),在ROSC后36小时。主要结局是随机分组后6个月的全因死亡率。STEPCARE试验的另外两个组成部分评估镇静和体温控制策略。除STEPCARE试验干预措施外,一般重症监护的所有其他方面都将根据参与地点的当地做法进行。神经系统预测将根据欧洲复苏委员会和欧洲重症监护医学学会的指导方针,由一名对分配组不知情的医生进行。为了检测绝对风险降低5.6%,alpha值为0.05,功率为90%,将招募3500名参与者。次要结局将是随机化6个月后功能不良结局的参与者比例,重症监护病房的严重不良事件,以及随机化6个月后患者报告的整体健康状况。结论:SED-CARE试验将调查心脏骤停后持续深度镇静(RASS -4/-5) 36小时是否比最小镇静(RASS 0至-2)更能降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Continuous deep sedation versus minimal sedation after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (SED-CARE): A protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Sedation is often provided to resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to tolerate post-cardiac arrest care, including temperature management. However, the evidence of benefit or harm from routinely administered deep sedation after cardiac arrest is limited. The aim of this trial is to investigate the effects of continuous deep sedation compared to minimal sedation on patient-important outcomes in resuscitated OHCA patients in a large clinical trial.

Methods: The SED-CARE trial is part of the 2 × 2 × 2 factorial Sedation, Temperature and Pressure after Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (STEPCARE) trial, a randomized international, multicentre, parallel-group, investigator-initiated, superiority trial with three simultaneous intervention arms. In the SED-CARE trial, adults with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) who are comatose following resuscitation from OHCA will be randomized within 4 hours to continuous deep sedation (Richmond agitation and sedation scale (RASS) -4/-5) (intervention) or minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) (comparator), for 36 h after ROSC. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 6 months after randomization. The two other components of the STEPCARE trial evaluate sedation and temperature control strategies. Apart from the STEPCARE trial interventions, all other aspects of general intensive care will be according to the local practices of the participating site. Neurological prognostication will be performed according to European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines by a physician blinded to the allocation group. To detect an absolute risk reduction of 5.6% with an alpha of 0.05, 90% power, 3500 participants will be enrolled. The secondary outcomes will be the proportion of participants with poor functional outcomes 6 months after randomization, serious adverse events in the intensive care unit, and patient-reported overall health status 6 months after randomization.

Conclusion: The SED-CARE trial will investigate if continuous deep sedation (RASS -4/-5) for 36 h confers a mortality benefit compared to minimal sedation (RASS 0 to -2) after cardiac arrest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信