{"title":"分形几何与医疗决策的复杂性","authors":"Benjamin Doolittle, Andrew Loza","doi":"10.1111/jep.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>With advances in technology, medical decision-making has become increasingly complex. Fractal geometry provides a framework to grapple with this daunting complexity. Fractals are defined as, ‘infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales.’ These patterns have been used to understand the seeming randomness of recurring patterns in nature, financial markets, quantum physics, and even forest fires, war, and the respiratory system. Mandlebrot the mathematician who discovered his eponymous fractal pattern wrote, ‘Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.’ The same could be said about medicine. To understand optimal medical decision making, we need to examine not only performance, but the complexity-cost to obtain that performance. This complexity can be visualized through the fractal tree of potential branches produced by a plan of care. To confront the growing complexity of medical care, we must prune this fractal tree while ensuring favorable outcomes. To do this, we offer three propositions as pruning shears for the complexity of the fractal tree: wisdom, trust, and prevention.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractal Geometry and the Complexity of Medical Decision-Making\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Doolittle, Andrew Loza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>With advances in technology, medical decision-making has become increasingly complex. Fractal geometry provides a framework to grapple with this daunting complexity. Fractals are defined as, ‘infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales.’ These patterns have been used to understand the seeming randomness of recurring patterns in nature, financial markets, quantum physics, and even forest fires, war, and the respiratory system. Mandlebrot the mathematician who discovered his eponymous fractal pattern wrote, ‘Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.’ The same could be said about medicine. To understand optimal medical decision making, we need to examine not only performance, but the complexity-cost to obtain that performance. This complexity can be visualized through the fractal tree of potential branches produced by a plan of care. To confront the growing complexity of medical care, we must prune this fractal tree while ensuring favorable outcomes. To do this, we offer three propositions as pruning shears for the complexity of the fractal tree: wisdom, trust, and prevention.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fractal Geometry and the Complexity of Medical Decision-Making
With advances in technology, medical decision-making has become increasingly complex. Fractal geometry provides a framework to grapple with this daunting complexity. Fractals are defined as, ‘infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales.’ These patterns have been used to understand the seeming randomness of recurring patterns in nature, financial markets, quantum physics, and even forest fires, war, and the respiratory system. Mandlebrot the mathematician who discovered his eponymous fractal pattern wrote, ‘Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.’ The same could be said about medicine. To understand optimal medical decision making, we need to examine not only performance, but the complexity-cost to obtain that performance. This complexity can be visualized through the fractal tree of potential branches produced by a plan of care. To confront the growing complexity of medical care, we must prune this fractal tree while ensuring favorable outcomes. To do this, we offer three propositions as pruning shears for the complexity of the fractal tree: wisdom, trust, and prevention.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.