分形几何与医疗决策的复杂性

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Benjamin Doolittle, Andrew Loza
{"title":"分形几何与医疗决策的复杂性","authors":"Benjamin Doolittle,&nbsp;Andrew Loza","doi":"10.1111/jep.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>With advances in technology, medical decision-making has become increasingly complex. Fractal geometry provides a framework to grapple with this daunting complexity. Fractals are defined as, ‘infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales.’ These patterns have been used to understand the seeming randomness of recurring patterns in nature, financial markets, quantum physics, and even forest fires, war, and the respiratory system. Mandlebrot the mathematician who discovered his eponymous fractal pattern wrote, ‘Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.’ The same could be said about medicine. To understand optimal medical decision making, we need to examine not only performance, but the complexity-cost to obtain that performance. This complexity can be visualized through the fractal tree of potential branches produced by a plan of care. To confront the growing complexity of medical care, we must prune this fractal tree while ensuring favorable outcomes. To do this, we offer three propositions as pruning shears for the complexity of the fractal tree: wisdom, trust, and prevention.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractal Geometry and the Complexity of Medical Decision-Making\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Doolittle,&nbsp;Andrew Loza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>With advances in technology, medical decision-making has become increasingly complex. Fractal geometry provides a framework to grapple with this daunting complexity. Fractals are defined as, ‘infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales.’ These patterns have been used to understand the seeming randomness of recurring patterns in nature, financial markets, quantum physics, and even forest fires, war, and the respiratory system. Mandlebrot the mathematician who discovered his eponymous fractal pattern wrote, ‘Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.’ The same could be said about medicine. To understand optimal medical decision making, we need to examine not only performance, but the complexity-cost to obtain that performance. This complexity can be visualized through the fractal tree of potential branches produced by a plan of care. To confront the growing complexity of medical care, we must prune this fractal tree while ensuring favorable outcomes. To do this, we offer three propositions as pruning shears for the complexity of the fractal tree: wisdom, trust, and prevention.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70086\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着技术的进步,医疗决策变得越来越复杂。分形几何提供了一个框架来处理这种令人生畏的复杂性。分形被定义为“在不同尺度上自相似的无限复杂模式”。“这些模式已经被用来理解自然界、金融市场、量子物理、甚至森林火灾、战争和呼吸系统中反复出现的模式的看似随机性。”发现以他的名字命名的分形图案的数学家曼德布洛特写道:“美丽,难,越来越有用。这是分形。这同样适用于医学。为了理解最佳医疗决策,我们不仅需要检查性能,还需要检查获得该性能的复杂性成本。这种复杂性可以通过护理计划产生的潜在分支的分形树来可视化。面对日益复杂的医疗保健,我们必须修剪这棵分形树,同时确保有利的结果。为了做到这一点,我们提供了三个命题作为分形树的复杂性的剪枝:智慧,信任和预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fractal Geometry and the Complexity of Medical Decision-Making

With advances in technology, medical decision-making has become increasingly complex. Fractal geometry provides a framework to grapple with this daunting complexity. Fractals are defined as, ‘infinitely complex patterns that are self-similar across different scales.’ These patterns have been used to understand the seeming randomness of recurring patterns in nature, financial markets, quantum physics, and even forest fires, war, and the respiratory system. Mandlebrot the mathematician who discovered his eponymous fractal pattern wrote, ‘Beautiful, damn hard, increasingly useful. That's fractals.’ The same could be said about medicine. To understand optimal medical decision making, we need to examine not only performance, but the complexity-cost to obtain that performance. This complexity can be visualized through the fractal tree of potential branches produced by a plan of care. To confront the growing complexity of medical care, we must prune this fractal tree while ensuring favorable outcomes. To do this, we offer three propositions as pruning shears for the complexity of the fractal tree: wisdom, trust, and prevention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信