免疫抑制患者多发性非黑色素瘤皮肤肿瘤的化疗:一项前瞻性队列分析

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Petra Rózsa, Benjamin Tamás Papp, Edit Szederkényi, Gábor Vass, Csilla Hánis, Ildikó Csányi, Henriette Ócsai, Eszter Baltás, Judit Oláh, Lajos Kemény, Rolland Gyulai, Erika Kis
{"title":"免疫抑制患者多发性非黑色素瘤皮肤肿瘤的化疗:一项前瞻性队列分析","authors":"Petra Rózsa,&nbsp;Benjamin Tamás Papp,&nbsp;Edit Szederkényi,&nbsp;Gábor Vass,&nbsp;Csilla Hánis,&nbsp;Ildikó Csányi,&nbsp;Henriette Ócsai,&nbsp;Eszter Baltás,&nbsp;Judit Oláh,&nbsp;Lajos Kemény,&nbsp;Rolland Gyulai,&nbsp;Erika Kis","doi":"10.1155/dth/7037657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Immunosuppressed patients face a significantly higher risk of developing malignant skin tumors compared to the general population, often presenting with numerous, rapidly growing, and aggressive lesions. It can be particularly challenging to treat these tumors, especially in the head and neck region. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a viable option for treating multiple tumors simultaneously. This study aims to compare the efficacy, toxicity, and impacts on the quality of life of ECT of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunosuppressed patients and nonimmunosuppressed patients.</p>\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 156 tumors (82 target lesions) in 14 immunosuppressed patients and 183 tumors (157 target lesions) in 30 nonimmunosuppressed patients were treated with ECT using intravenous bleomycin according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of ECT (ESOPE) guidelines. Patients were monitored for at least 6 months. A prospective cohort analysis was carried out to compare tumor response, side effects, and quality of life in the two groups.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> 3 months after ECT, nonimmunosuppressed patients showed a significantly higher tumor response rate (<i>p</i> = 0.001). After 6 months, a statistically significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding tumor response. After 3 and 6 months, there was no difference in toxicity, pain, and EQ-VAS values.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of ECT for treating NMSCs in immunosuppressed patients seems to be comparable to the nonimmunosuppressed patients. The emphasis on prevention, adopting a multidisciplinary approach, and optimizing immunosuppression are crucial to improving the care and management of this patient cohort.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/7037657","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrochemotherapy for Multiple Nonmelanoma Skin Tumors in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Prospective Cohort Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Petra Rózsa,&nbsp;Benjamin Tamás Papp,&nbsp;Edit Szederkényi,&nbsp;Gábor Vass,&nbsp;Csilla Hánis,&nbsp;Ildikó Csányi,&nbsp;Henriette Ócsai,&nbsp;Eszter Baltás,&nbsp;Judit Oláh,&nbsp;Lajos Kemény,&nbsp;Rolland Gyulai,&nbsp;Erika Kis\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/dth/7037657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Immunosuppressed patients face a significantly higher risk of developing malignant skin tumors compared to the general population, often presenting with numerous, rapidly growing, and aggressive lesions. It can be particularly challenging to treat these tumors, especially in the head and neck region. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a viable option for treating multiple tumors simultaneously. This study aims to compare the efficacy, toxicity, and impacts on the quality of life of ECT of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunosuppressed patients and nonimmunosuppressed patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 156 tumors (82 target lesions) in 14 immunosuppressed patients and 183 tumors (157 target lesions) in 30 nonimmunosuppressed patients were treated with ECT using intravenous bleomycin according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of ECT (ESOPE) guidelines. Patients were monitored for at least 6 months. A prospective cohort analysis was carried out to compare tumor response, side effects, and quality of life in the two groups.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> 3 months after ECT, nonimmunosuppressed patients showed a significantly higher tumor response rate (<i>p</i> = 0.001). After 6 months, a statistically significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding tumor response. After 3 and 6 months, there was no difference in toxicity, pain, and EQ-VAS values.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of ECT for treating NMSCs in immunosuppressed patients seems to be comparable to the nonimmunosuppressed patients. The emphasis on prevention, adopting a multidisciplinary approach, and optimizing immunosuppression are crucial to improving the care and management of this patient cohort.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/7037657\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/7037657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/7037657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与一般人群相比,免疫抑制患者患恶性皮肤肿瘤的风险明显更高,通常表现为大量、快速生长和侵袭性病变。治疗这些肿瘤尤其具有挑战性,尤其是头颈部的肿瘤。电疗(ECT)成为同时治疗多种肿瘤的可行选择。本研究旨在比较免疫抑制患者和非免疫抑制患者的非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSCs) ECT的疗效、毒性和对生活质量的影响。材料与方法:14例免疫抑制患者共156个肿瘤(82个靶病灶),30例非免疫抑制患者共183个肿瘤(157个靶病灶),根据欧洲电痉挛治疗标准操作规程(ESOPE)指南,采用静脉注射博来霉素治疗电痉挛。对患者进行至少6个月的监测。进行前瞻性队列分析,比较两组患者的肿瘤反应、副作用和生活质量。结果:ECT治疗3个月后,非免疫抑制患者的肿瘤有效率显著高于对照组(p = 0.001)。6个月后,两组肿瘤反应无统计学差异。3个月和6个月后,毒性、疼痛和EQ-VAS值无差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,ECT治疗免疫抑制患者的NMSCs的有效性和安全性似乎与非免疫抑制患者相当。强调预防,采用多学科方法,优化免疫抑制对改善该患者队列的护理和管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Electrochemotherapy for Multiple Nonmelanoma Skin Tumors in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Prospective Cohort Analysis

Electrochemotherapy for Multiple Nonmelanoma Skin Tumors in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Prospective Cohort Analysis

Introduction: Immunosuppressed patients face a significantly higher risk of developing malignant skin tumors compared to the general population, often presenting with numerous, rapidly growing, and aggressive lesions. It can be particularly challenging to treat these tumors, especially in the head and neck region. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a viable option for treating multiple tumors simultaneously. This study aims to compare the efficacy, toxicity, and impacts on the quality of life of ECT of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunosuppressed patients and nonimmunosuppressed patients.

Materials and Methods: A total of 156 tumors (82 target lesions) in 14 immunosuppressed patients and 183 tumors (157 target lesions) in 30 nonimmunosuppressed patients were treated with ECT using intravenous bleomycin according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of ECT (ESOPE) guidelines. Patients were monitored for at least 6 months. A prospective cohort analysis was carried out to compare tumor response, side effects, and quality of life in the two groups.

Results: 3 months after ECT, nonimmunosuppressed patients showed a significantly higher tumor response rate (p = 0.001). After 6 months, a statistically significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding tumor response. After 3 and 6 months, there was no difference in toxicity, pain, and EQ-VAS values.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of ECT for treating NMSCs in immunosuppressed patients seems to be comparable to the nonimmunosuppressed patients. The emphasis on prevention, adopting a multidisciplinary approach, and optimizing immunosuppression are crucial to improving the care and management of this patient cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Therapy
Dermatologic Therapy 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信