Petra Rózsa, Benjamin Tamás Papp, Edit Szederkényi, Gábor Vass, Csilla Hánis, Ildikó Csányi, Henriette Ócsai, Eszter Baltás, Judit Oláh, Lajos Kemény, Rolland Gyulai, Erika Kis
{"title":"免疫抑制患者多发性非黑色素瘤皮肤肿瘤的化疗:一项前瞻性队列分析","authors":"Petra Rózsa, Benjamin Tamás Papp, Edit Szederkényi, Gábor Vass, Csilla Hánis, Ildikó Csányi, Henriette Ócsai, Eszter Baltás, Judit Oláh, Lajos Kemény, Rolland Gyulai, Erika Kis","doi":"10.1155/dth/7037657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Immunosuppressed patients face a significantly higher risk of developing malignant skin tumors compared to the general population, often presenting with numerous, rapidly growing, and aggressive lesions. It can be particularly challenging to treat these tumors, especially in the head and neck region. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a viable option for treating multiple tumors simultaneously. This study aims to compare the efficacy, toxicity, and impacts on the quality of life of ECT of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunosuppressed patients and nonimmunosuppressed patients.</p>\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 156 tumors (82 target lesions) in 14 immunosuppressed patients and 183 tumors (157 target lesions) in 30 nonimmunosuppressed patients were treated with ECT using intravenous bleomycin according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of ECT (ESOPE) guidelines. Patients were monitored for at least 6 months. A prospective cohort analysis was carried out to compare tumor response, side effects, and quality of life in the two groups.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> 3 months after ECT, nonimmunosuppressed patients showed a significantly higher tumor response rate (<i>p</i> = 0.001). After 6 months, a statistically significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding tumor response. After 3 and 6 months, there was no difference in toxicity, pain, and EQ-VAS values.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of ECT for treating NMSCs in immunosuppressed patients seems to be comparable to the nonimmunosuppressed patients. The emphasis on prevention, adopting a multidisciplinary approach, and optimizing immunosuppression are crucial to improving the care and management of this patient cohort.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11045,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Therapy","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/7037657","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrochemotherapy for Multiple Nonmelanoma Skin Tumors in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Prospective Cohort Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Petra Rózsa, Benjamin Tamás Papp, Edit Szederkényi, Gábor Vass, Csilla Hánis, Ildikó Csányi, Henriette Ócsai, Eszter Baltás, Judit Oláh, Lajos Kemény, Rolland Gyulai, Erika Kis\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/dth/7037657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Immunosuppressed patients face a significantly higher risk of developing malignant skin tumors compared to the general population, often presenting with numerous, rapidly growing, and aggressive lesions. It can be particularly challenging to treat these tumors, especially in the head and neck region. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a viable option for treating multiple tumors simultaneously. This study aims to compare the efficacy, toxicity, and impacts on the quality of life of ECT of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunosuppressed patients and nonimmunosuppressed patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> A total of 156 tumors (82 target lesions) in 14 immunosuppressed patients and 183 tumors (157 target lesions) in 30 nonimmunosuppressed patients were treated with ECT using intravenous bleomycin according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of ECT (ESOPE) guidelines. Patients were monitored for at least 6 months. A prospective cohort analysis was carried out to compare tumor response, side effects, and quality of life in the two groups.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> 3 months after ECT, nonimmunosuppressed patients showed a significantly higher tumor response rate (<i>p</i> = 0.001). After 6 months, a statistically significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding tumor response. After 3 and 6 months, there was no difference in toxicity, pain, and EQ-VAS values.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Our results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of ECT for treating NMSCs in immunosuppressed patients seems to be comparable to the nonimmunosuppressed patients. The emphasis on prevention, adopting a multidisciplinary approach, and optimizing immunosuppression are crucial to improving the care and management of this patient cohort.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/dth/7037657\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/7037657\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/dth/7037657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrochemotherapy for Multiple Nonmelanoma Skin Tumors in Immunosuppressed Patients: A Prospective Cohort Analysis
Introduction: Immunosuppressed patients face a significantly higher risk of developing malignant skin tumors compared to the general population, often presenting with numerous, rapidly growing, and aggressive lesions. It can be particularly challenging to treat these tumors, especially in the head and neck region. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerges as a viable option for treating multiple tumors simultaneously. This study aims to compare the efficacy, toxicity, and impacts on the quality of life of ECT of nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) in immunosuppressed patients and nonimmunosuppressed patients.
Materials and Methods: A total of 156 tumors (82 target lesions) in 14 immunosuppressed patients and 183 tumors (157 target lesions) in 30 nonimmunosuppressed patients were treated with ECT using intravenous bleomycin according to the European Standard Operating Procedures of ECT (ESOPE) guidelines. Patients were monitored for at least 6 months. A prospective cohort analysis was carried out to compare tumor response, side effects, and quality of life in the two groups.
Results: 3 months after ECT, nonimmunosuppressed patients showed a significantly higher tumor response rate (p = 0.001). After 6 months, a statistically significant difference was not observed between the two groups regarding tumor response. After 3 and 6 months, there was no difference in toxicity, pain, and EQ-VAS values.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of ECT for treating NMSCs in immunosuppressed patients seems to be comparable to the nonimmunosuppressed patients. The emphasis on prevention, adopting a multidisciplinary approach, and optimizing immunosuppression are crucial to improving the care and management of this patient cohort.
期刊介绍:
Dermatologic Therapy has been created to fill an important void in the dermatologic literature: the lack of a readily available source of up-to-date information on the treatment of specific cutaneous diseases and the practical application of specific treatment modalities. Each issue of the journal consists of a series of scholarly review articles written by leaders in dermatology in which they describe, in very specific terms, how they treat particular cutaneous diseases and how they use specific therapeutic agents. The information contained in each issue is so practical and detailed that the reader should be able to directly apply various treatment approaches to daily clinical situations. Because of the specific and practical nature of this publication, Dermatologic Therapy not only serves as a readily available resource for the day-to-day treatment of patients, but also as an evolving therapeutic textbook for the treatment of dermatologic diseases.