浅基础基础形状对承载力影响的研究进展

IF 9.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Lysandros Pantelidis, Eleyas Assefa, Constantine I. Sachpazis
{"title":"浅基础基础形状对承载力影响的研究进展","authors":"Lysandros Pantelidis,&nbsp;Eleyas Assefa,&nbsp;Constantine I. Sachpazis","doi":"10.1007/s11831-024-10184-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review paper examines the evolution of shape factors for the bearing capacity of shallow foundations, with a specific focus on rectangular and circular footings. Through a critical examination of methodologies from early empirical approaches to the sophisticated analyses enabled by recent technological advancements, this paper highlights the transformative impact of computational modeling on the field. Specifically, the review utilizes 3D finite element and finite difference analyses to validate and recalibrate shape factors against modern and reliable data. The quantitative findings confirm the reliability of the shape factors developed by Zhu and Michalowski in 2005 through classical finite element analysis in Abaqus. Their <span>\\({s}_{\\gamma }\\)</span> factor, for example, was validated using Flac3D. Particularly notable is the finding that shape factors for circular footings can be effectively expressed by adjusting those for square footings using a simple geometric ratio, <span>\\(4/\\pi \\)</span>. This adjustment, based on the perimeter or area ratios of the two shapes, suggests a more efficient approach that challenges the necessity for distinct shape factors for different footing types. Additionally, the review highlights historical gaps such as non-documented factors from early empirical research, limitations due to the scale effects of small-scale tests, and assumptions supporting shape factors derived from limit analysis. It also emphasizes that depending on the aspect ratio of the footing and the friction angle of the soil, the percentage error in bearing capacity calculations using non-acceptable shape factors, including those adopted by various design standards, could be several tens of percentage units. Additionally, the review identifies a gap in current research regarding large-scale experimental validation of these computational models, pointing to future directions in experimental research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 3","pages":"1597 - 1617"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Footing Shape on the Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations: A Review\",\"authors\":\"Lysandros Pantelidis,&nbsp;Eleyas Assefa,&nbsp;Constantine I. Sachpazis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11831-024-10184-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This review paper examines the evolution of shape factors for the bearing capacity of shallow foundations, with a specific focus on rectangular and circular footings. Through a critical examination of methodologies from early empirical approaches to the sophisticated analyses enabled by recent technological advancements, this paper highlights the transformative impact of computational modeling on the field. Specifically, the review utilizes 3D finite element and finite difference analyses to validate and recalibrate shape factors against modern and reliable data. The quantitative findings confirm the reliability of the shape factors developed by Zhu and Michalowski in 2005 through classical finite element analysis in Abaqus. Their <span>\\\\({s}_{\\\\gamma }\\\\)</span> factor, for example, was validated using Flac3D. Particularly notable is the finding that shape factors for circular footings can be effectively expressed by adjusting those for square footings using a simple geometric ratio, <span>\\\\(4/\\\\pi \\\\)</span>. This adjustment, based on the perimeter or area ratios of the two shapes, suggests a more efficient approach that challenges the necessity for distinct shape factors for different footing types. Additionally, the review highlights historical gaps such as non-documented factors from early empirical research, limitations due to the scale effects of small-scale tests, and assumptions supporting shape factors derived from limit analysis. It also emphasizes that depending on the aspect ratio of the footing and the friction angle of the soil, the percentage error in bearing capacity calculations using non-acceptable shape factors, including those adopted by various design standards, could be several tens of percentage units. Additionally, the review identifies a gap in current research regarding large-scale experimental validation of these computational models, pointing to future directions in experimental research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"1597 - 1617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10184-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-024-10184-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文综述了浅基础承载能力的形状因素的演变,特别关注矩形和圆形基础。通过对从早期经验方法到最近技术进步所带来的复杂分析方法的批判性检查,本文强调了计算建模对该领域的变革性影响。具体来说,该综述利用三维有限元和有限差分分析来根据现代可靠数据验证和重新校准形状因子。定量结果证实了Zhu和Michalowski在2005年通过Abaqus经典有限元分析开发的形状因子的可靠性。例如,他们的\({s}_{\gamma }\)因子是使用Flac3D验证的。特别值得注意的是,圆形基座的形状因素可以通过使用一个简单的几何比例\(4/\pi \)来有效地表达。这种基于两种形状的周长或面积比的调整,提出了一种更有效的方法,挑战了不同基础类型不同形状因素的必要性。此外,回顾强调了历史差距,如早期实证研究的未记录因素,小规模试验规模效应的局限性,以及从极限分析中得出的支持形状因素的假设。它还强调,根据基础的纵横比和土壤的摩擦角,使用不可接受的形状因素计算承载力的百分比误差,包括各种设计标准所采用的,可能是几十个百分比单位。此外,该综述指出了当前研究中关于这些计算模型的大规模实验验证的差距,指出了实验研究的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Footing Shape on the Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundations: A Review

This review paper examines the evolution of shape factors for the bearing capacity of shallow foundations, with a specific focus on rectangular and circular footings. Through a critical examination of methodologies from early empirical approaches to the sophisticated analyses enabled by recent technological advancements, this paper highlights the transformative impact of computational modeling on the field. Specifically, the review utilizes 3D finite element and finite difference analyses to validate and recalibrate shape factors against modern and reliable data. The quantitative findings confirm the reliability of the shape factors developed by Zhu and Michalowski in 2005 through classical finite element analysis in Abaqus. Their \({s}_{\gamma }\) factor, for example, was validated using Flac3D. Particularly notable is the finding that shape factors for circular footings can be effectively expressed by adjusting those for square footings using a simple geometric ratio, \(4/\pi \). This adjustment, based on the perimeter or area ratios of the two shapes, suggests a more efficient approach that challenges the necessity for distinct shape factors for different footing types. Additionally, the review highlights historical gaps such as non-documented factors from early empirical research, limitations due to the scale effects of small-scale tests, and assumptions supporting shape factors derived from limit analysis. It also emphasizes that depending on the aspect ratio of the footing and the friction angle of the soil, the percentage error in bearing capacity calculations using non-acceptable shape factors, including those adopted by various design standards, could be several tens of percentage units. Additionally, the review identifies a gap in current research regarding large-scale experimental validation of these computational models, pointing to future directions in experimental research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信