Miranda P. Lawell MS , Melanie L. Rose MD, MS , Jaitri Joshi BS , Jessica A. Marinelli BS , Megan J. Upton BA , Sara L. Dennehy MS , Soo L. Kang BSN , Elizabeth A. Weyman DNP , Keith W. Allison MS , Nancy J. Tarbell MD , Shannon M. MacDonald MD , Benjamin V.M. Bajaj MS , Torunn I. Yock MD, MCH
{"title":"在接受质子放射治疗的儿童肿瘤患者大队列中自我报告健康状况调查的创建和分布结果","authors":"Miranda P. Lawell MS , Melanie L. Rose MD, MS , Jaitri Joshi BS , Jessica A. Marinelli BS , Megan J. Upton BA , Sara L. Dennehy MS , Soo L. Kang BSN , Elizabeth A. Weyman DNP , Keith W. Allison MS , Nancy J. Tarbell MD , Shannon M. MacDonald MD , Benjamin V.M. Bajaj MS , Torunn I. Yock MD, MCH","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Most pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital are referred from outside institutions and later return to their original care providers. As quaternary care centers, proton therapy centers face unique challenges in tracking patient follow-up, yet obtaining longitudinal data is crucial for assessing radiation therapy outcomes. We implemented an annual direct-to-patient survey to improve follow-up data collection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>The survey was designed to be completed in <5 minutes and records contact information, health status (recent follow-up and with which specialists, imaging, the status of treated disease/secondary tumors, additional treatments, and symptoms), and social updates. Surveys were sent annually as mailed letters with a quick response code or by e-mail using research electronic data capture software. Data were collected between February 2019 and June 2022. Approval was obtained to send surveys to oncology patients prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial or the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry at our single institution.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 472 participants who were sent at least 1 survey, 236 (50%) responded. Patients who received surveys via e-mail were 1.6 times as likely to respond than those who received surveys via mail (<em>P</em> < .001). The median time (days) to survey completion for mailed and e-mailed surveys were 20 and 3, respectively. Survey completion extended the last available clinical status on record for patients by a median of 8.5 (<1-63.3) months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Survey implementation improved follow-up data collection, with e-mail being more effective than mail as a distribution method. Adaptation and utilization of our survey in other tertiary and quaternary centers may improve the collection of patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 5","pages":"Article 101748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Reported Health Status Survey Creation and Distribution Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Pediatric Oncology Patients Treated with Proton Radiation Therapy\",\"authors\":\"Miranda P. Lawell MS , Melanie L. Rose MD, MS , Jaitri Joshi BS , Jessica A. Marinelli BS , Megan J. Upton BA , Sara L. Dennehy MS , Soo L. Kang BSN , Elizabeth A. Weyman DNP , Keith W. Allison MS , Nancy J. Tarbell MD , Shannon M. MacDonald MD , Benjamin V.M. Bajaj MS , Torunn I. Yock MD, MCH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2025.101748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Most pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital are referred from outside institutions and later return to their original care providers. As quaternary care centers, proton therapy centers face unique challenges in tracking patient follow-up, yet obtaining longitudinal data is crucial for assessing radiation therapy outcomes. We implemented an annual direct-to-patient survey to improve follow-up data collection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>The survey was designed to be completed in <5 minutes and records contact information, health status (recent follow-up and with which specialists, imaging, the status of treated disease/secondary tumors, additional treatments, and symptoms), and social updates. Surveys were sent annually as mailed letters with a quick response code or by e-mail using research electronic data capture software. Data were collected between February 2019 and June 2022. Approval was obtained to send surveys to oncology patients prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial or the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry at our single institution.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 472 participants who were sent at least 1 survey, 236 (50%) responded. Patients who received surveys via e-mail were 1.6 times as likely to respond than those who received surveys via mail (<em>P</em> < .001). The median time (days) to survey completion for mailed and e-mailed surveys were 20 and 3, respectively. Survey completion extended the last available clinical status on record for patients by a median of 8.5 (<1-63.3) months.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Survey implementation improved follow-up data collection, with e-mail being more effective than mail as a distribution method. Adaptation and utilization of our survey in other tertiary and quaternary centers may improve the collection of patient outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 101748\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109425000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-Reported Health Status Survey Creation and Distribution Outcomes in a Large Cohort of Pediatric Oncology Patients Treated with Proton Radiation Therapy
Purpose
Most pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital are referred from outside institutions and later return to their original care providers. As quaternary care centers, proton therapy centers face unique challenges in tracking patient follow-up, yet obtaining longitudinal data is crucial for assessing radiation therapy outcomes. We implemented an annual direct-to-patient survey to improve follow-up data collection.
Methods and Materials
The survey was designed to be completed in <5 minutes and records contact information, health status (recent follow-up and with which specialists, imaging, the status of treated disease/secondary tumors, additional treatments, and symptoms), and social updates. Surveys were sent annually as mailed letters with a quick response code or by e-mail using research electronic data capture software. Data were collected between February 2019 and June 2022. Approval was obtained to send surveys to oncology patients prospectively enrolled in a clinical trial or the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry at our single institution.
Results
Of the 472 participants who were sent at least 1 survey, 236 (50%) responded. Patients who received surveys via e-mail were 1.6 times as likely to respond than those who received surveys via mail (P < .001). The median time (days) to survey completion for mailed and e-mailed surveys were 20 and 3, respectively. Survey completion extended the last available clinical status on record for patients by a median of 8.5 (<1-63.3) months.
Conclusions
Survey implementation improved follow-up data collection, with e-mail being more effective than mail as a distribution method. Adaptation and utilization of our survey in other tertiary and quaternary centers may improve the collection of patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.