纳米和先进材料遗传毒性评价的新方法优势与挑战

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Arno C. Gutleb , Sivakumar Murugadoss , Maciej Stępnik , Tanima SenGupta , Naouale El Yamani , Eleonora Marta Longhin , Ann-Karin Hardie Olsen , Ewelina Wyrzykowska , Karolina Jagiello , Beata Judzinska , Sebastien Cambier , Tatiana Honza , Erin McFadden , Sergey Shaposhnikov , Tomasz Puzyn , Tommaso Serchi , Pamina Weber , Emma Arnesdotter , Vier Skakalova , Katerina Jirsova , Maria Dusinska
{"title":"纳米和先进材料遗传毒性评价的新方法优势与挑战","authors":"Arno C. Gutleb ,&nbsp;Sivakumar Murugadoss ,&nbsp;Maciej Stępnik ,&nbsp;Tanima SenGupta ,&nbsp;Naouale El Yamani ,&nbsp;Eleonora Marta Longhin ,&nbsp;Ann-Karin Hardie Olsen ,&nbsp;Ewelina Wyrzykowska ,&nbsp;Karolina Jagiello ,&nbsp;Beata Judzinska ,&nbsp;Sebastien Cambier ,&nbsp;Tatiana Honza ,&nbsp;Erin McFadden ,&nbsp;Sergey Shaposhnikov ,&nbsp;Tomasz Puzyn ,&nbsp;Tommaso Serchi ,&nbsp;Pamina Weber ,&nbsp;Emma Arnesdotter ,&nbsp;Vier Skakalova ,&nbsp;Katerina Jirsova ,&nbsp;Maria Dusinska","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2025.503867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Genotoxicity assessment is essential for ensuring chemical safety and mitigating risks to human health and the environment. Traditional methods, reliant on animal models, are time-consuming, costly, and raise ethical concerns. New Approach Methods (NAMs) offer innovative, cost-effective, and ethical alternatives, playing a pivotal role in both traditional and next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) by minimizing the need for animal testing, particularly in genotoxicity evaluations. However, the development of NAMs often overlooks the particular physicochemical properties of nanomaterials (NMs), which significantly influence their toxicological behaviour and can interfere with genotoxicity evaluation. This underscores an urgent need for the standardization and adaptation of NAMs to address nano- and advanced material-specific genotoxicity challenges. In this review, we summarize the challenges associated with genotoxicity testing of NMs and highlight the suitability of existing <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in silico</em> NAMs for NMs and advanced materials, enabling genotoxicity testing across various exposure routes and organ systems. Despite considerable progress, regulatory validation remains constrained by the absence of approved test guidelines and standardized protocols. To achieve regulatory acceptance, it is crucial to adapt NAMs to NM-specific exposure scenarios, refine test systems to better mimic human biology, develop tailored <em>in vitro</em> protocols, and ensure thorough characterisation of NMs both in pristine form and dispersed in culture medium. Collaborative efforts among scientists, regulators, industry, and advocacy groups are vital to improving the reliability and regulatory acceptance of NAMs. By addressing these challenges, NAMs have the potential to revolutionize genotoxicity risk assessment, advancing it towards a more sustainable, efficient and ethical framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18799,"journal":{"name":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","volume":"904 ","pages":"Article 503867"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Approach Methods (NAMs) for genotoxicity assessment of nano- and advanced materials; Advantages and challenges\",\"authors\":\"Arno C. Gutleb ,&nbsp;Sivakumar Murugadoss ,&nbsp;Maciej Stępnik ,&nbsp;Tanima SenGupta ,&nbsp;Naouale El Yamani ,&nbsp;Eleonora Marta Longhin ,&nbsp;Ann-Karin Hardie Olsen ,&nbsp;Ewelina Wyrzykowska ,&nbsp;Karolina Jagiello ,&nbsp;Beata Judzinska ,&nbsp;Sebastien Cambier ,&nbsp;Tatiana Honza ,&nbsp;Erin McFadden ,&nbsp;Sergey Shaposhnikov ,&nbsp;Tomasz Puzyn ,&nbsp;Tommaso Serchi ,&nbsp;Pamina Weber ,&nbsp;Emma Arnesdotter ,&nbsp;Vier Skakalova ,&nbsp;Katerina Jirsova ,&nbsp;Maria Dusinska\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2025.503867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Genotoxicity assessment is essential for ensuring chemical safety and mitigating risks to human health and the environment. Traditional methods, reliant on animal models, are time-consuming, costly, and raise ethical concerns. New Approach Methods (NAMs) offer innovative, cost-effective, and ethical alternatives, playing a pivotal role in both traditional and next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) by minimizing the need for animal testing, particularly in genotoxicity evaluations. However, the development of NAMs often overlooks the particular physicochemical properties of nanomaterials (NMs), which significantly influence their toxicological behaviour and can interfere with genotoxicity evaluation. This underscores an urgent need for the standardization and adaptation of NAMs to address nano- and advanced material-specific genotoxicity challenges. In this review, we summarize the challenges associated with genotoxicity testing of NMs and highlight the suitability of existing <em>in vitro</em> and <em>in silico</em> NAMs for NMs and advanced materials, enabling genotoxicity testing across various exposure routes and organ systems. Despite considerable progress, regulatory validation remains constrained by the absence of approved test guidelines and standardized protocols. To achieve regulatory acceptance, it is crucial to adapt NAMs to NM-specific exposure scenarios, refine test systems to better mimic human biology, develop tailored <em>in vitro</em> protocols, and ensure thorough characterisation of NMs both in pristine form and dispersed in culture medium. Collaborative efforts among scientists, regulators, industry, and advocacy groups are vital to improving the reliability and regulatory acceptance of NAMs. By addressing these challenges, NAMs have the potential to revolutionize genotoxicity risk assessment, advancing it towards a more sustainable, efficient and ethical framework.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis\",\"volume\":\"904 \",\"pages\":\"Article 503867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571825000269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571825000269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遗传毒性评估对于确保化学品安全和减轻对人类健康和环境的风险至关重要。传统方法依赖于动物模型,耗时、昂贵,并引起伦理问题。新方法(NAMs)提供了创新的、具有成本效益的和合乎道德的替代方案,通过最大限度地减少动物试验的需要,在传统和下一代风险评估(NGRA)中发挥关键作用,特别是在遗传毒性评估中。然而,纳米材料的发展往往忽视了纳米材料(NMs)的特殊物理化学性质,这些性质会显著影响其毒理学行为,并可能干扰遗传毒性评估。这强调了NAMs标准化和适应的迫切需要,以解决纳米和先进材料特异性遗传毒性的挑战。在这篇综述中,我们总结了与纳米粒子遗传毒性测试相关的挑战,并强调了现有的体外和硅纳米粒子对纳米粒子和先进材料的适用性,从而能够在各种暴露途径和器官系统中进行遗传毒性测试。尽管取得了相当大的进展,但由于缺乏批准的测试指南和标准化协议,监管验证仍然受到限制。为了获得监管认可,关键是要使纳米颗粒适应纳米颗粒特定的暴露情况,完善测试系统以更好地模拟人类生物学,开发量身定制的体外方案,并确保纳米颗粒在原始形式和分散在培养基中的彻底表征。科学家、监管机构、行业和倡导团体之间的合作努力对于提高NAMs的可靠性和监管接受度至关重要。通过应对这些挑战,NAMs有可能彻底改变遗传毒性风险评估,推动其朝着更可持续、更有效和更合乎道德的框架发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Approach Methods (NAMs) for genotoxicity assessment of nano- and advanced materials; Advantages and challenges
Genotoxicity assessment is essential for ensuring chemical safety and mitigating risks to human health and the environment. Traditional methods, reliant on animal models, are time-consuming, costly, and raise ethical concerns. New Approach Methods (NAMs) offer innovative, cost-effective, and ethical alternatives, playing a pivotal role in both traditional and next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) by minimizing the need for animal testing, particularly in genotoxicity evaluations. However, the development of NAMs often overlooks the particular physicochemical properties of nanomaterials (NMs), which significantly influence their toxicological behaviour and can interfere with genotoxicity evaluation. This underscores an urgent need for the standardization and adaptation of NAMs to address nano- and advanced material-specific genotoxicity challenges. In this review, we summarize the challenges associated with genotoxicity testing of NMs and highlight the suitability of existing in vitro and in silico NAMs for NMs and advanced materials, enabling genotoxicity testing across various exposure routes and organ systems. Despite considerable progress, regulatory validation remains constrained by the absence of approved test guidelines and standardized protocols. To achieve regulatory acceptance, it is crucial to adapt NAMs to NM-specific exposure scenarios, refine test systems to better mimic human biology, develop tailored in vitro protocols, and ensure thorough characterisation of NMs both in pristine form and dispersed in culture medium. Collaborative efforts among scientists, regulators, industry, and advocacy groups are vital to improving the reliability and regulatory acceptance of NAMs. By addressing these challenges, NAMs have the potential to revolutionize genotoxicity risk assessment, advancing it towards a more sustainable, efficient and ethical framework.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
审稿时长
105 days
期刊介绍: Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (MRGTEM) publishes papers advancing knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. Papers are welcomed in the following areas: New developments in genotoxicity testing of chemical agents (e.g. improvements in methodology of assay systems and interpretation of results). Alternatives to and refinement of the use of animals in genotoxicity testing. Nano-genotoxicology, the study of genotoxicity hazards and risks related to novel man-made nanomaterials. Studies of epigenetic changes in relation to genotoxic effects. The use of structure-activity relationships in predicting genotoxic effects. The isolation and chemical characterization of novel environmental mutagens. The measurement of genotoxic effects in human populations, when accompanied by quantitative measurements of environmental or occupational exposures. The application of novel technologies for assessing the hazard and risks associated with genotoxic substances (e.g. OMICS or other high-throughput approaches to genotoxicity testing). MRGTEM is now accepting submissions for a new section of the journal: Current Topics in Genotoxicity Testing, that will be dedicated to the discussion of current issues relating to design, interpretation and strategic use of genotoxicity tests. This section is envisaged to include discussions relating to the development of new international testing guidelines, but also to wider topics in the field. The evaluation of contrasting or opposing viewpoints is welcomed as long as the presentation is in accordance with the journal''s aims, scope, and policies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信