验证改进的LEMON标准在预测儿科急诊患者插管困难方面的性能

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Shima Ohnishi , Yusuke Hagiwara , Shunsuke Amagasa , Satoko Uematsu
{"title":"验证改进的LEMON标准在预测儿科急诊患者插管困难方面的性能","authors":"Shima Ohnishi ,&nbsp;Yusuke Hagiwara ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Amagasa ,&nbsp;Satoko Uematsu","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The current study aimed to investigate the use of the modified LEMON (which stands for Look externally, Evaluate the 3–3-2 rule, Obstructed airway, and Neck mobility) criteria in predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational multicenter analysis of data from the 4th Japanese Emergency Airway Network (JEAN-4) study was conducted from October 2018 to September 2022. Patients aged &lt;18 years who were intubated and registered in the JEAN-4 study were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified LEMON criteria for predicting difficult tracheal intubation (defined as ≥3 intubation attempts by pediatric emergency attending physicians or fellows).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 546 patients were included in this study. There were 34 (6 %) and 512 (94 %) cases of difficult tracheal intubation and nondifficult tracheal intubation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified LEMON criteria for predicting difficult tracheal intubation in the ED were 41 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 25 %–59 %), 73 % (95 % CI: 69 %–77 %), 9 % (95 % CI: 5 %–15 %), and 95 % (95 % CI: 92 %–97 %), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on this multicenter observational study, the modified LEMON criteria presented with neither a high sensitivity nor specificity for predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients in the ED. Therefore, with consideration of age and physical characteristics, standards individualized based on the specific needs of pediatric patients must be developed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"93 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the performance of the modified LEMON criteria in predicting difficult intubation among pediatric emergency patients\",\"authors\":\"Shima Ohnishi ,&nbsp;Yusuke Hagiwara ,&nbsp;Shunsuke Amagasa ,&nbsp;Satoko Uematsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.03.067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The current study aimed to investigate the use of the modified LEMON (which stands for Look externally, Evaluate the 3–3-2 rule, Obstructed airway, and Neck mobility) criteria in predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An observational multicenter analysis of data from the 4th Japanese Emergency Airway Network (JEAN-4) study was conducted from October 2018 to September 2022. Patients aged &lt;18 years who were intubated and registered in the JEAN-4 study were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified LEMON criteria for predicting difficult tracheal intubation (defined as ≥3 intubation attempts by pediatric emergency attending physicians or fellows).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 546 patients were included in this study. There were 34 (6 %) and 512 (94 %) cases of difficult tracheal intubation and nondifficult tracheal intubation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified LEMON criteria for predicting difficult tracheal intubation in the ED were 41 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 25 %–59 %), 73 % (95 % CI: 69 %–77 %), 9 % (95 % CI: 5 %–15 %), and 95 % (95 % CI: 92 %–97 %), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Based on this multicenter observational study, the modified LEMON criteria presented with neither a high sensitivity nor specificity for predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients in the ED. Therefore, with consideration of age and physical characteristics, standards individualized based on the specific needs of pediatric patients must be developed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"93 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725002323\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725002323","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨改良的LEMON (Look external, Evaluate the 3-3-2 rule, obstructive airway, and Neck mobility)标准在预测急诊科(ED)儿科患者插管困难中的应用。方法对2018年10月至2022年9月第四次日本紧急气道网络(JEAN-4)研究的数据进行观察性多中心分析。在JEAN-4研究中登记的18 岁插管患者纳入本分析。主要结局是改良的LEMON标准预测气管插管困难(定义为儿科急诊主治医生或研究员插管尝试≥3次)的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果共纳入546例患者。气管插管困难34例(6 %),气管插管无困难512例(94 %)。敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值,修改后的柠檬的负面预测价值标准预测困难气管插管在ED 41 %(95 %可信区间[CI]: 25 % -59 %),73 %(95 % CI: 69 % -77 %),9 %(95 % CI: -15  % %),和95年 %(95 % CI: 92 % -97 %),分别。结论在本多中心观察性研究的基础上,改良后的LEMON标准对于预测急诊科儿科患者插管困难的敏感性和特异性均不高。因此,必须在考虑儿童患者年龄和身体特征的基础上,根据儿童患者的具体需求制定个性化的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validating the performance of the modified LEMON criteria in predicting difficult intubation among pediatric emergency patients

Objective

The current study aimed to investigate the use of the modified LEMON (which stands for Look externally, Evaluate the 3–3-2 rule, Obstructed airway, and Neck mobility) criteria in predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

An observational multicenter analysis of data from the 4th Japanese Emergency Airway Network (JEAN-4) study was conducted from October 2018 to September 2022. Patients aged <18 years who were intubated and registered in the JEAN-4 study were included in this analysis. The primary outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified LEMON criteria for predicting difficult tracheal intubation (defined as ≥3 intubation attempts by pediatric emergency attending physicians or fellows).

Results

In total, 546 patients were included in this study. There were 34 (6 %) and 512 (94 %) cases of difficult tracheal intubation and nondifficult tracheal intubation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the modified LEMON criteria for predicting difficult tracheal intubation in the ED were 41 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 25 %–59 %), 73 % (95 % CI: 69 %–77 %), 9 % (95 % CI: 5 %–15 %), and 95 % (95 % CI: 92 %–97 %), respectively.

Conclusion

Based on this multicenter observational study, the modified LEMON criteria presented with neither a high sensitivity nor specificity for predicting difficult intubation in pediatric patients in the ED. Therefore, with consideration of age and physical characteristics, standards individualized based on the specific needs of pediatric patients must be developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信