A.T. Gilman , J. Kim , S.Y. Jiang , S.E. Abramovitz , R.S. White
{"title":"实施增强剖宫产后恢复方案前后严重孕产妇发病率的种族健康差异:纽约市两家医院的回顾性观察研究(2016-2020)","authors":"A.T. Gilman , J. Kim , S.Y. Jiang , S.E. Abramovitz , R.S. White","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) is an evidence-based pathway that aims to improve the quality of care for all patients. Standardization of care has been seen as a tool to promote equality and equity. Our goal was to evaluate racial differences in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among patients before and after implementation of an ERAC program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was performed among cesarean delivery patients pre- and post-ERAC implementation at two large academic hospitals in New York City from October 2016 to September 2020. Logistic regression models were created to compare peripartum SMM complications pre-ERAC, post-ERAC, and overall, by race.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). Within the overall population, Black (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.28; <em>P</em>=0.018) and Asian (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14; <em>P</em>=0.001) patients had higher odds of SMM compared to white patients. Pre-ERAC, Black (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.14; <em>P</em>=0.010) and Asian patients (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.74; <em>P</em>=0.002) had higher odds of SMM relative to white patients. Post-ERAC, this relationship was no longer statistically significant [Black (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.01; <em>P</em>=0.69) and Asian (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.17; <em>P</em>=0.15)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementation of the ERAC protocol improved SMM outcomes by race. Standardization of practices in ERAC protocols can help address disparities by reducing variations in obstetrical care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 104362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial health disparities in severe maternal morbidity before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocol: a retrospective observational study at two NYC hospitals (2016–2020)\",\"authors\":\"A.T. Gilman , J. Kim , S.Y. Jiang , S.E. Abramovitz , R.S. White\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) is an evidence-based pathway that aims to improve the quality of care for all patients. Standardization of care has been seen as a tool to promote equality and equity. Our goal was to evaluate racial differences in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among patients before and after implementation of an ERAC program.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was performed among cesarean delivery patients pre- and post-ERAC implementation at two large academic hospitals in New York City from October 2016 to September 2020. Logistic regression models were created to compare peripartum SMM complications pre-ERAC, post-ERAC, and overall, by race.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). Within the overall population, Black (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.28; <em>P</em>=0.018) and Asian (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14; <em>P</em>=0.001) patients had higher odds of SMM compared to white patients. Pre-ERAC, Black (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.14; <em>P</em>=0.010) and Asian patients (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.74; <em>P</em>=0.002) had higher odds of SMM relative to white patients. Post-ERAC, this relationship was no longer statistically significant [Black (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.01; <em>P</em>=0.69) and Asian (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.17; <em>P</em>=0.15)].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Implementation of the ERAC protocol improved SMM outcomes by race. Standardization of practices in ERAC protocols can help address disparities by reducing variations in obstetrical care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000342\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25000342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景剖宫产后增强恢复(ERAC)是一种以证据为基础的途径,旨在提高所有患者的护理质量。护理标准化一直被视为促进平等和公平的工具。我们的目的是评估实施ERAC计划前后患者中严重产妇发病率(SMM)的种族差异。方法对2016年10月至2020年9月在纽约市两家大型学术医院实施erac前后的剖宫产患者进行回顾性研究。建立Logistic回归模型,按种族比较erac前、erac后和总体围生期SMM并发症。结果7812例剖宫产患者中,erac术前4640例(59.4%),erac术后3172例(40.6%)。在总体人群中,黑(aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 ~ 2.28;P=0.018)和亚洲(aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.20 ~ 2.14;P=0.001)患者的SMM发生率高于白人患者。Pre-ERAC,黑色(aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.16 - 3.14;P=0.010)和亚洲患者(aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.26 ~ 2.74;P=0.002)患SMM的几率高于白人患者。erac后,这种关系不再具有统计学意义[Black (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 ~ 2.01;P=0.69)和亚洲(aOR 1.39, 95% CI 0.88 ~ 2.17;P = 0.15)。结论ERAC方案的实施改善了不同种族的SMM结果。ERAC协议的标准化实践可以通过减少产科护理的差异来帮助解决差异。
Racial health disparities in severe maternal morbidity before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery protocol: a retrospective observational study at two NYC hospitals (2016–2020)
Background
Enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery (ERAC) is an evidence-based pathway that aims to improve the quality of care for all patients. Standardization of care has been seen as a tool to promote equality and equity. Our goal was to evaluate racial differences in severe maternal morbidity (SMM) among patients before and after implementation of an ERAC program.
Methods
A retrospective study was performed among cesarean delivery patients pre- and post-ERAC implementation at two large academic hospitals in New York City from October 2016 to September 2020. Logistic regression models were created to compare peripartum SMM complications pre-ERAC, post-ERAC, and overall, by race.
Results
The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). Within the overall population, Black (aOR 1.57, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.28; P=0.018) and Asian (aOR 1.61, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.14; P=0.001) patients had higher odds of SMM compared to white patients. Pre-ERAC, Black (aOR 1.92, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.14; P=0.010) and Asian patients (aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.74; P=0.002) had higher odds of SMM relative to white patients. Post-ERAC, this relationship was no longer statistically significant [Black (aOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.01; P=0.69) and Asian (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 0.88 to 2.17; P=0.15)].
Conclusion
Implementation of the ERAC protocol improved SMM outcomes by race. Standardization of practices in ERAC protocols can help address disparities by reducing variations in obstetrical care.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.