David Schneck, Andres Arguedas, Annette Xenopoulos-Oddsson, Ximena Arcila-Londono, Christian Lunetta, James Wymer, Nicholas Olney, Kelly Gwathmey, Senda Ajroud-Driss, Ghazala Hayat, Terry Heiman-Patterson, Federica Cerri, Christina Fournier, Jonathan Glass, Alex Sherman, Mark Fiecas, David Walk
{"title":"使用里程碑建模方法的ALS事件时间预测,使用ALS自然历史联盟数据集。","authors":"David Schneck, Andres Arguedas, Annette Xenopoulos-Oddsson, Ximena Arcila-Londono, Christian Lunetta, James Wymer, Nicholas Olney, Kelly Gwathmey, Senda Ajroud-Driss, Ghazala Hayat, Terry Heiman-Patterson, Federica Cerri, Christina Fournier, Jonathan Glass, Alex Sherman, Mark Fiecas, David Walk","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2482943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Times to clinically relevant events are a valuable outcome in observational and interventional studies, complementing linear outcomes such as functional rating scales and biomarkers. In ALS, there are several clinically relevant events. We developed dynamic prediction models for several of these times to events that can be used for clinical trial modeling and personal planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Landmark time-to-event analysis was implemented to determine the effect of patient characteristics on disease progression. Longitudinal data from 1557 participants in the ALS Natural History Consortium dataset were used. Five outcomes in the ALS disease progression were considered: loss of ambulation, loss of speech, gastrostomy, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use, and continuous NIV use. Covariates in our models include age at diagnosis, sex, onset location, riluzole use, diagnostic delay, ALSFRS-R scores at the landmark time, and ALSFRS-R rates of change from baseline. Internal and external validation techniques were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each of our models and landmark times, we present risk prediction intervals for random sets of patient characteristics. We demonstrate our models' application for an individual's personal predicted time-to-event. Our internal and external validation metrics indicate good concordance and overall performance. The time to loss of speech models perform the best for each metric in terms of both internal and external validation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Landmarking is an efficient, individualized risk prediction model that is intuitive for both clinicians and patients. Importantly, landmarking can be used for clinical trial modeling, personal planning, and development of real-world evidence of the impacts of treatment interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"417-425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-to-event prediction in ALS using a landmark modeling approach, using the ALS Natural History Consortium dataset.\",\"authors\":\"David Schneck, Andres Arguedas, Annette Xenopoulos-Oddsson, Ximena Arcila-Londono, Christian Lunetta, James Wymer, Nicholas Olney, Kelly Gwathmey, Senda Ajroud-Driss, Ghazala Hayat, Terry Heiman-Patterson, Federica Cerri, Christina Fournier, Jonathan Glass, Alex Sherman, Mark Fiecas, David Walk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21678421.2025.2482943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Times to clinically relevant events are a valuable outcome in observational and interventional studies, complementing linear outcomes such as functional rating scales and biomarkers. In ALS, there are several clinically relevant events. We developed dynamic prediction models for several of these times to events that can be used for clinical trial modeling and personal planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Landmark time-to-event analysis was implemented to determine the effect of patient characteristics on disease progression. Longitudinal data from 1557 participants in the ALS Natural History Consortium dataset were used. Five outcomes in the ALS disease progression were considered: loss of ambulation, loss of speech, gastrostomy, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use, and continuous NIV use. Covariates in our models include age at diagnosis, sex, onset location, riluzole use, diagnostic delay, ALSFRS-R scores at the landmark time, and ALSFRS-R rates of change from baseline. Internal and external validation techniques were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For each of our models and landmark times, we present risk prediction intervals for random sets of patient characteristics. We demonstrate our models' application for an individual's personal predicted time-to-event. Our internal and external validation metrics indicate good concordance and overall performance. The time to loss of speech models perform the best for each metric in terms of both internal and external validation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Landmarking is an efficient, individualized risk prediction model that is intuitive for both clinicians and patients. Importantly, landmarking can be used for clinical trial modeling, personal planning, and development of real-world evidence of the impacts of treatment interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"417-425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2482943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2482943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:发生临床相关事件的时间是观察性和干预性研究的重要结果,是对功能评分表和生物标志物等线性结果的补充。在 ALS 中,有几种临床相关事件。我们为其中几个事件的发生时间开发了动态预测模型,可用于临床试验建模和个人规划:方法:采用标志性事件发生时间分析来确定患者特征对疾病进展的影响。研究使用了 ALS 自然史联合会数据集中 1557 名参与者的纵向数据。考虑了 ALS 疾病进展中的五种结果:丧失行动能力、丧失语言能力、胃造口、使用无创通气(NIV)和持续使用 NIV。模型中的协变量包括诊断时的年龄、性别、发病地点、利鲁唑的使用、诊断延迟、标志性时间的 ALSFRS-R 评分以及 ALSFRS-R 与基线相比的变化率。我们采用了内部和外部验证技术:对于我们的每个模型和地标时间,我们都给出了随机患者特征集的风险预测区间。我们展示了模型在个人事件预测时间上的应用。我们的内部和外部验证指标显示了良好的一致性和整体性能。在内部和外部验证方面,语音损失时间模型的各项指标均表现最佳:地标法是一种高效、个性化的风险预测模型,对临床医生和患者来说都很直观。重要的是,Landmarking 可用于临床试验建模、个人规划以及治疗干预效果的实际证据开发。
Time-to-event prediction in ALS using a landmark modeling approach, using the ALS Natural History Consortium dataset.
Background and objectives: Times to clinically relevant events are a valuable outcome in observational and interventional studies, complementing linear outcomes such as functional rating scales and biomarkers. In ALS, there are several clinically relevant events. We developed dynamic prediction models for several of these times to events that can be used for clinical trial modeling and personal planning.
Methods: Landmark time-to-event analysis was implemented to determine the effect of patient characteristics on disease progression. Longitudinal data from 1557 participants in the ALS Natural History Consortium dataset were used. Five outcomes in the ALS disease progression were considered: loss of ambulation, loss of speech, gastrostomy, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) use, and continuous NIV use. Covariates in our models include age at diagnosis, sex, onset location, riluzole use, diagnostic delay, ALSFRS-R scores at the landmark time, and ALSFRS-R rates of change from baseline. Internal and external validation techniques were used.
Results: For each of our models and landmark times, we present risk prediction intervals for random sets of patient characteristics. We demonstrate our models' application for an individual's personal predicted time-to-event. Our internal and external validation metrics indicate good concordance and overall performance. The time to loss of speech models perform the best for each metric in terms of both internal and external validation.
Discussion: Landmarking is an efficient, individualized risk prediction model that is intuitive for both clinicians and patients. Importantly, landmarking can be used for clinical trial modeling, personal planning, and development of real-world evidence of the impacts of treatment interventions.