Joanie Martineau, Francis Bernard, Alexandrine Gagnon, Virginie Williams, Sabrina Araujo de Franca, David Williamson, Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas
{"title":"在急性脑损伤的重症患者中,动脉二氧化碳的变化比其同步值更能决定脑组织氧合。","authors":"Joanie Martineau, Francis Bernard, Alexandrine Gagnon, Virginie Williams, Sabrina Araujo de Franca, David Williamson, Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In critically ill patients with acute brain injury (ABI), maintaining intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) within targets could prevent secondary neurologic injury. Tight control of CO2 (Paco2), a potent regulator of cerebrovascular tone, is generally advocated, but its vasomotor effect may be short-lived. Our aim was to compare the effect of the synchronous Paco2 vs. its variation from a previous baseline on PbtO2 and ICP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study collecting arterial blood gas (ABG) values alongside synchronous neuromonitoring variables. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to evaluate the association between Paco2 and/or Paco2 variation from its average of the last 8-24 hr vs. PbtO2 and ICP, while controlling for cerebral perfusion pressure and Pao2.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Mixed medical-surgical ICU of Sacré-Coeur Hospital, an academic trauma center in Montreal, Canada.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All consecutive adult patients admitted for ABI with ICP and PbtO2 monitoring between May 2017 and November 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We included 78 patients with 3047 ABG-neuromonitoring couplets. The model using the variation of Paco2 from its average of the last 24 hr displayed the best performance for the prediction of PbtO2 (coefficient 0.37; 95% CI 0.21-0.53). The strongest predictor of ICP was the variation of Paco2 from its average of the last 8 hr (coefficient 0.17; 95% CI 0.10-0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variation in Paco2 from baseline is a more significant determinant of PbtO2 and ICP than the absolute Paco2 value at a given time. There may be a baseline vasomotor reset when patients are exposed to a given level of CO2 for 8 to 24 hr. Therefore, sustained intentional manipulation of Paco2 is unlikely to have lasting effects and slower correction rates of high or low Paco2 could help prevent brain tissue hypoxia or intracranial hypertension, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 4","pages":"e1241"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Arterial CO2 is a Stronger Determinant of Brain Tissue Oxygenation Than its Synchronous Value in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Joanie Martineau, Francis Bernard, Alexandrine Gagnon, Virginie Williams, Sabrina Araujo de Franca, David Williamson, Yiorgos Alexandros Cavayas\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In critically ill patients with acute brain injury (ABI), maintaining intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) within targets could prevent secondary neurologic injury. Tight control of CO2 (Paco2), a potent regulator of cerebrovascular tone, is generally advocated, but its vasomotor effect may be short-lived. Our aim was to compare the effect of the synchronous Paco2 vs. its variation from a previous baseline on PbtO2 and ICP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study collecting arterial blood gas (ABG) values alongside synchronous neuromonitoring variables. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to evaluate the association between Paco2 and/or Paco2 variation from its average of the last 8-24 hr vs. PbtO2 and ICP, while controlling for cerebral perfusion pressure and Pao2.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Mixed medical-surgical ICU of Sacré-Coeur Hospital, an academic trauma center in Montreal, Canada.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All consecutive adult patients admitted for ABI with ICP and PbtO2 monitoring between May 2017 and November 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We included 78 patients with 3047 ABG-neuromonitoring couplets. The model using the variation of Paco2 from its average of the last 24 hr displayed the best performance for the prediction of PbtO2 (coefficient 0.37; 95% CI 0.21-0.53). The strongest predictor of ICP was the variation of Paco2 from its average of the last 8 hr (coefficient 0.17; 95% CI 0.10-0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variation in Paco2 from baseline is a more significant determinant of PbtO2 and ICP than the absolute Paco2 value at a given time. There may be a baseline vasomotor reset when patients are exposed to a given level of CO2 for 8 to 24 hr. Therefore, sustained intentional manipulation of Paco2 is unlikely to have lasting effects and slower correction rates of high or low Paco2 could help prevent brain tissue hypoxia or intracranial hypertension, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"e1241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:在重症急性脑损伤(ABI)患者中,维持颅内压(ICP)和脑组织氧合(PbtO2)在目标范围内可预防继发性神经系统损伤。严格控制二氧化碳(Paco2)是脑血管张力的有效调节剂,通常被提倡,但其血管舒缩作用可能是短暂的。我们的目的是比较同步Paco2与之前基线的变化对PbtO2和ICP的影响。设计:我们对一项前瞻性队列研究进行了事后分析,该研究收集了动脉血气(ABG)值以及同步神经监测变量。在控制脑灌注压和Pao2的情况下,拟合线性混合效应模型来评估Paco2和/或Paco2在过去8-24小时的平均值变化与PbtO2和ICP之间的关系。地点:加拿大蒙特利尔的学术创伤中心sacr - coeur医院的综合内科-外科ICU。患者:2017年5月至2021年11月期间,所有连续因ABI入院并进行ICP和PbtO2监测的成年患者。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:我们纳入了78例3047例abg -神经监测联。利用Paco2过去24小时平均值变化的模型对PbtO2的预测效果最好(系数0.37;95% ci 0.21-0.53)。ICP的最强预测因子是Paco2相对于前8小时平均值的变化(系数0.17;95% ci 0.10-0.23)。结论:与基线相比,Paco2的变化是PbtO2和ICP的一个更重要的决定因素,而不是给定时间的绝对Paco2值。当患者暴露于给定水平的二氧化碳8至24小时时,可能会出现基线血管舒缩复位。因此,持续的故意操作Paco2不太可能产生持久的效果,较慢的高或低Paco2矫正率分别有助于预防脑组织缺氧或颅内高压。
Variation in Arterial CO2 is a Stronger Determinant of Brain Tissue Oxygenation Than its Synchronous Value in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Brain Injury.
Objectives: In critically ill patients with acute brain injury (ABI), maintaining intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) within targets could prevent secondary neurologic injury. Tight control of CO2 (Paco2), a potent regulator of cerebrovascular tone, is generally advocated, but its vasomotor effect may be short-lived. Our aim was to compare the effect of the synchronous Paco2 vs. its variation from a previous baseline on PbtO2 and ICP.
Design: We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study collecting arterial blood gas (ABG) values alongside synchronous neuromonitoring variables. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to evaluate the association between Paco2 and/or Paco2 variation from its average of the last 8-24 hr vs. PbtO2 and ICP, while controlling for cerebral perfusion pressure and Pao2.
Setting: Mixed medical-surgical ICU of Sacré-Coeur Hospital, an academic trauma center in Montreal, Canada.
Patients: All consecutive adult patients admitted for ABI with ICP and PbtO2 monitoring between May 2017 and November 2021.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: We included 78 patients with 3047 ABG-neuromonitoring couplets. The model using the variation of Paco2 from its average of the last 24 hr displayed the best performance for the prediction of PbtO2 (coefficient 0.37; 95% CI 0.21-0.53). The strongest predictor of ICP was the variation of Paco2 from its average of the last 8 hr (coefficient 0.17; 95% CI 0.10-0.23).
Conclusions: Variation in Paco2 from baseline is a more significant determinant of PbtO2 and ICP than the absolute Paco2 value at a given time. There may be a baseline vasomotor reset when patients are exposed to a given level of CO2 for 8 to 24 hr. Therefore, sustained intentional manipulation of Paco2 is unlikely to have lasting effects and slower correction rates of high or low Paco2 could help prevent brain tissue hypoxia or intracranial hypertension, respectively.