IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Biomarkers Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1177/18758592241297849
Jon O Ebbert, Ernest T Hawk, Christopher V Chambers, Margaret A Tempero, Elliot K Fishman, Jospeh E Ravenell, Tomasz M Beer, Seema P Rego
{"title":"Multi-cancer early detection tests: Attributes for clinical implementation.","authors":"Jon O Ebbert, Ernest T Hawk, Christopher V Chambers, Margaret A Tempero, Elliot K Fishman, Jospeh E Ravenell, Tomasz M Beer, Seema P Rego","doi":"10.1177/18758592241297849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guideline-recommended screening programs exist for only a few single-cancer types, and these cancers represent less than one-half of all new cancer cases diagnosed each year in the U.S. In addition, these \"single-cancer\" standard of care (SoC) screening tests vary in accuracy, adherence, and effectiveness, though all are generally understood to lead to reductions in cancer-related mortality. Recent advances in high-throughput technologies and machine learning have facilitated the development of blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests. The opportunity for early detection of multiple cancers with a single blood test holds promise in addressing the current unmet need in cancer screening. By complementing existing SoC screening, MCED tests have the potential to detect a wide range of cancers at earlier stages when patients are asymptomatic, enabling more effective treatment options and improved cancer outcomes. MCED tests are positioned to be utilized as a complementary screening tool to improve screening adherence at the population level, to broaden screening availability for individuals who are not adherent with SoC screening programs, as well as for those who may harbor cancers that do not have SoC testing available. Published work to date has primarily focused on test performance relating to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). MCED tests will require approval through the pre-market approval pathway from the United States Food and Drug Administration. Additional studies will be needed to demonstrate clinical utility (i.e., improvements in health outcomes) and establish optimal implementation strategies, (i.e., testing intervals), follow-up and logistics of shared decision making. Here, we propose core attributes of MCED testing for which clinical data are needed to ideally position MCED testing for widespread use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":56320,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biomarkers","volume":"42 2","pages":"18758592241297849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18758592241297849","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此外,这些 "单一癌症 "标准护理(SoC)筛查测试在准确性、依从性和有效性方面各不相同,但一般都能降低癌症相关死亡率。高通量技术和机器学习的最新进展促进了基于血液的多癌症早期检测(MCED)的发展。通过一次血液检测就能实现多种癌症的早期检测,这为解决目前尚未满足的癌症筛查需求带来了希望。通过对现有 SoC 筛查的补充,MCED 检测有可能在患者无症状的早期阶段检测出多种癌症,从而提供更有效的治疗方案并改善癌症预后。MCED测试的定位是作为一种辅助筛查工具,用于提高人群的筛查依从性,为那些不依从SoC筛查计划的人以及那些可能罹患SoC测试不适用的癌症的人扩大筛查范围。迄今为止,已发表的研究成果主要集中在与灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)有关的测试性能方面。MCED 检测需要通过美国食品和药物管理局的上市前审批途径获得批准。还需要进行更多的研究,以证明其临床效用(即改善健康结果),并确定最佳实施策略(即测试间隔)、随访和共同决策的后勤工作。在此,我们提出了MCED检测的核心属性,这些属性需要临床数据的支持,以便为MCED检测在临床实践中的广泛应用提供理想的定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-cancer early detection tests: Attributes for clinical implementation.

Guideline-recommended screening programs exist for only a few single-cancer types, and these cancers represent less than one-half of all new cancer cases diagnosed each year in the U.S. In addition, these "single-cancer" standard of care (SoC) screening tests vary in accuracy, adherence, and effectiveness, though all are generally understood to lead to reductions in cancer-related mortality. Recent advances in high-throughput technologies and machine learning have facilitated the development of blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests. The opportunity for early detection of multiple cancers with a single blood test holds promise in addressing the current unmet need in cancer screening. By complementing existing SoC screening, MCED tests have the potential to detect a wide range of cancers at earlier stages when patients are asymptomatic, enabling more effective treatment options and improved cancer outcomes. MCED tests are positioned to be utilized as a complementary screening tool to improve screening adherence at the population level, to broaden screening availability for individuals who are not adherent with SoC screening programs, as well as for those who may harbor cancers that do not have SoC testing available. Published work to date has primarily focused on test performance relating to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). MCED tests will require approval through the pre-market approval pathway from the United States Food and Drug Administration. Additional studies will be needed to demonstrate clinical utility (i.e., improvements in health outcomes) and establish optimal implementation strategies, (i.e., testing intervals), follow-up and logistics of shared decision making. Here, we propose core attributes of MCED testing for which clinical data are needed to ideally position MCED testing for widespread use in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Biomarkers
Cancer Biomarkers ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
195
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Concentrating on molecular biomarkers in cancer research, Cancer Biomarkers publishes original research findings (and reviews solicited by the editor) on the subject of the identification of markers associated with the disease processes whether or not they are an integral part of the pathological lesion. The disease markers may include, but are not limited to, genomic, epigenomic, proteomics, cellular and morphologic, and genetic factors predisposing to the disease or indicating the occurrence of the disease. Manuscripts on these factors or biomarkers, either in altered forms, abnormal concentrations or with abnormal tissue distribution leading to disease causation will be accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信