{"title":"Exploring the mechanism of work-family conflict on obesity-related eating behavior among employees: a large-scale cross-sectional study in China.","authors":"Fangjie Dong, Tingting Liao","doi":"10.1080/13548506.2025.2486507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has demonstrated associations between work-family conflict (WFC) and obesity-related eating behaviors (OEB). However, the mechanism underlying this relationship remain unclear, especially regarding the differential impacts of work-to-family conflict (WtFC) and family-to-work conflict (FtWC). Based on conservation of resources theory, this study investigated how WtFC and FtWC influences OEB through self-efficacy and anxiety, and whether intention to have the first-child (IC1) and second-child (IC2) moderates these relationships. Data were collected from 1,708 Chinese employees aged 19-35 using a cross-sectional survey. Results showed that both WtFC and FtWC positively predicted OEB (<i>β</i> = 0.141, <i>p</i> = 0.001; <i>β</i> = 0.223, <i>p</i> < 0.001). FtWC predicted OEB through two pathways: directly through anxiety (<i>β</i> = 0.066, 95% CI: 0.045 to 0.089) and sequentially through self-efficacy and anxiety (<i>β</i> = 0.003, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.006). WtFC showed no significant indirect effects through these pathways. IC2 strengthened the mediating effect of anxiety in the FtWC-OEB relationship (Index = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.019), while no significant moderating effect was found for IC1. These findings reveal distinct mechanisms through which WtFC and FtWC influence eating behaviors among Chinese employees, highlighting the complex interplay between work-family dynamics, psychological resources, emotions, and health behaviors. The results provide insights for developing targeted interventions to address OEB in workplace settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54535,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Health & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Health & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2025.2486507","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the mechanism of work-family conflict on obesity-related eating behavior among employees: a large-scale cross-sectional study in China.
Previous research has demonstrated associations between work-family conflict (WFC) and obesity-related eating behaviors (OEB). However, the mechanism underlying this relationship remain unclear, especially regarding the differential impacts of work-to-family conflict (WtFC) and family-to-work conflict (FtWC). Based on conservation of resources theory, this study investigated how WtFC and FtWC influences OEB through self-efficacy and anxiety, and whether intention to have the first-child (IC1) and second-child (IC2) moderates these relationships. Data were collected from 1,708 Chinese employees aged 19-35 using a cross-sectional survey. Results showed that both WtFC and FtWC positively predicted OEB (β = 0.141, p = 0.001; β = 0.223, p < 0.001). FtWC predicted OEB through two pathways: directly through anxiety (β = 0.066, 95% CI: 0.045 to 0.089) and sequentially through self-efficacy and anxiety (β = 0.003, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.006). WtFC showed no significant indirect effects through these pathways. IC2 strengthened the mediating effect of anxiety in the FtWC-OEB relationship (Index = 0.011, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.019), while no significant moderating effect was found for IC1. These findings reveal distinct mechanisms through which WtFC and FtWC influence eating behaviors among Chinese employees, highlighting the complex interplay between work-family dynamics, psychological resources, emotions, and health behaviors. The results provide insights for developing targeted interventions to address OEB in workplace settings.
期刊介绍：
Psychology, Health & Medicine is a multidisciplinary journal highlighting human factors in health. The journal provides a peer reviewed forum to report on issues of psychology and health in practice. This key publication reaches an international audience, highlighting the variation and similarities within different settings and exploring multiple health and illness issues from theoretical, practical and management perspectives. It provides a critical forum to examine the wide range of applied health and illness issues and how they incorporate psychological knowledge, understanding, theory and intervention. The journal reflects the growing recognition of psychosocial issues as they affect health planning, medical care, disease reaction, intervention, quality of life, adjustment adaptation and management.
For many years theoretical research was very distant from applied understanding. The emerging movement in health psychology, changes in medical care provision and training, and consumer awareness of health issues all contribute to a growing need for applied research. This journal focuses on practical applications of theory, research and experience and provides a bridge between academic knowledge, illness experience, wellbeing and health care practice.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
