巴西儿童和青少年情绪症状的简短互联网认知行为干预:一项随机临床试验

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Caio Borba Casella, Luis Carlos Farhat, Eunice Monteiro Labbadia, Pedro Fonseca Zuccolo, Daniel Fatori, Adriana Argeu, Giovanni Abrahão Salum, Guilherme V Polanczyk
{"title":"巴西儿童和青少年情绪症状的简短互联网认知行为干预:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Caio Borba Casella, Luis Carlos Farhat, Eunice Monteiro Labbadia, Pedro Fonseca Zuccolo, Daniel Fatori, Adriana Argeu, Giovanni Abrahão Salum, Guilherme V Polanczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.01.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emotional symptoms impose a significant burden on children and adolescents, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where treatment options are limited. Addressing this gap, we developed and assessed a brief cognitive-behavioral internet-delivered intervention targeting anxiety and depression symptoms in Brazilian youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in youth aged 8-17 with a total T-score ≥70 on the 25-item version of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, parent (RCADS-P) and child report (RCADS-C). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to cognitive-behavioral intervention (5 weekly sessions conducted by videoconference focused on skills training) or psychoeducation. Sessions were conducted with youth and their caregivers jointly. Participants were assessed at baseline, at post-treatment and at the 30-day follow-up. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to post-treatment on RCADS-P and RCADS-C scores. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05139433.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 15, 2021, and February 27, 2023, 280 participants were randomized, with 231 completing post-treatment and 214 completing follow-up assessments. In comparison to participants in the psychoeducation group, participants in the intervention group showed greater reductions in emotional symptoms according to youths (mean difference = 4.3, p = .013, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.44]) and parents (mean difference = 3.6, p = .023, SMD = .21 [95% CI 0.03-0.40]), as well as in anxiety scores according to youths (mean difference = 4.4, p = .0043, SMD = 0.28 [95% CI 0.09-0.47]) and parents (mean difference = 3.2, p = .030, SMD = 0.21 [95% CI 0.02-0.40]). There were no significant differences in depression scores at post-treatment according to youth (mean difference = 2.9, p = .063, SMD = 0.19 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.39]) or parents (mean difference = 2.2, p = .15, SMD = 0.15 [95% CI -0.05 to 0.33]), but effects emerged at the 30-day follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cognitive-behavioral intervention was effective in reducing emotional symptoms in children and adolescents in Brazil. This intervention holds promise for enhancing access to mental health care within a stepped-care model in public health contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":56278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Children and Adolescents With Emotional Symptoms in Brazil: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Caio Borba Casella, Luis Carlos Farhat, Eunice Monteiro Labbadia, Pedro Fonseca Zuccolo, Daniel Fatori, Adriana Argeu, Giovanni Abrahão Salum, Guilherme V Polanczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.01.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emotional symptoms impose a significant burden on children and adolescents, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where treatment options are limited. Addressing this gap, we developed and assessed a brief cognitive-behavioral internet-delivered intervention targeting anxiety and depression symptoms in Brazilian youth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in youth aged 8-17 with a total T-score ≥70 on the 25-item version of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, parent (RCADS-P) and child report (RCADS-C). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to cognitive-behavioral intervention (5 weekly sessions conducted by videoconference focused on skills training) or psychoeducation. Sessions were conducted with youth and their caregivers jointly. Participants were assessed at baseline, at post-treatment and at the 30-day follow-up. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to post-treatment on RCADS-P and RCADS-C scores. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05139433.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 15, 2021, and February 27, 2023, 280 participants were randomized, with 231 completing post-treatment and 214 completing follow-up assessments. In comparison to participants in the psychoeducation group, participants in the intervention group showed greater reductions in emotional symptoms according to youths (mean difference = 4.3, p = .013, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.44]) and parents (mean difference = 3.6, p = .023, SMD = .21 [95% CI 0.03-0.40]), as well as in anxiety scores according to youths (mean difference = 4.4, p = .0043, SMD = 0.28 [95% CI 0.09-0.47]) and parents (mean difference = 3.2, p = .030, SMD = 0.21 [95% CI 0.02-0.40]). There were no significant differences in depression scores at post-treatment according to youth (mean difference = 2.9, p = .063, SMD = 0.19 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.39]) or parents (mean difference = 2.2, p = .15, SMD = 0.15 [95% CI -0.05 to 0.33]), but effects emerged at the 30-day follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The cognitive-behavioral intervention was effective in reducing emotional symptoms in children and adolescents in Brazil. This intervention holds promise for enhancing access to mental health care within a stepped-care model in public health contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.01.021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2025.01.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:情绪症状给儿童和青少年造成了重大负担,特别是在治疗选择有限的低收入和中等收入国家。为了解决这一差距,我们开发并评估了一种针对巴西青年焦虑和抑郁症状的简短认知行为互联网干预措施。方法:我们在8-17岁的青少年中进行了一项单盲、双组、平行组、随机对照试验,这些青少年在25项修订儿童焦虑和抑郁量表、家长(RCADS-P)和儿童报告(RCADS-C)中总t分≥70分。参与者被随机(1:1)分配到认知行为干预组(每周5次,通过视频会议进行,重点是技能培训)或心理教育组。会议由青年和他们的照顾者共同进行。在基线、治疗后和30天随访时对参与者进行评估。主要结局是RCADS-P和RCADS-C评分从基线到治疗后的变化。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT05139433。结果:在2021年10月15日至2023年2月27日期间,280名参与者被随机分组,其中231人完成治疗后治疗,214人完成随访评估。与心理教育组的参与者相比,干预组的参与者在青少年(平均差异= 4.3,p = 0.013,标准化平均差异(SMD) = 0.25[95%可信区间(CI) 0.05-0.44])和父母(平均差异= 3.6,p = 0.023, SMD = 0.21 [95% CI 0.03-0.40])的情绪症状以及青少年焦虑得分(平均差异= 4.4,p = 0.0043,SMD = 0.28 [95% CI 0.09-0.47])和父母(平均差异= 3.2,p = 0.030, SMD = 0.21 [95% CI 0.02-0.40])。治疗后青少年抑郁评分差异无统计学意义(平均差异= 2.9,p = 0.063, SMD = 0.19 [95% CI -0.01 ~ 0.39]),父母抑郁评分差异无统计学意义(平均差异= 2.2,p = 0.15, SMD = 0.15 [95% CI -0.05 ~ 0.33]),但在30天的随访中出现了影响。无严重不良事件报告。讨论:认知行为干预在减少巴西儿童和青少年的情绪症状方面是有效的。这一干预措施有望在公共卫生背景下的阶梯式护理模式下增加获得精神卫生保健的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief Internet-Delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Children and Adolescents With Emotional Symptoms in Brazil: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Purpose: Emotional symptoms impose a significant burden on children and adolescents, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where treatment options are limited. Addressing this gap, we developed and assessed a brief cognitive-behavioral internet-delivered intervention targeting anxiety and depression symptoms in Brazilian youth.

Methods: We conducted a single-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in youth aged 8-17 with a total T-score ≥70 on the 25-item version of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, parent (RCADS-P) and child report (RCADS-C). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to cognitive-behavioral intervention (5 weekly sessions conducted by videoconference focused on skills training) or psychoeducation. Sessions were conducted with youth and their caregivers jointly. Participants were assessed at baseline, at post-treatment and at the 30-day follow-up. The primary outcome was the change from baseline to post-treatment on RCADS-P and RCADS-C scores. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05139433.

Results: Between October 15, 2021, and February 27, 2023, 280 participants were randomized, with 231 completing post-treatment and 214 completing follow-up assessments. In comparison to participants in the psychoeducation group, participants in the intervention group showed greater reductions in emotional symptoms according to youths (mean difference = 4.3, p = .013, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.44]) and parents (mean difference = 3.6, p = .023, SMD = .21 [95% CI 0.03-0.40]), as well as in anxiety scores according to youths (mean difference = 4.4, p = .0043, SMD = 0.28 [95% CI 0.09-0.47]) and parents (mean difference = 3.2, p = .030, SMD = 0.21 [95% CI 0.02-0.40]). There were no significant differences in depression scores at post-treatment according to youth (mean difference = 2.9, p = .063, SMD = 0.19 [95% CI -0.01 to 0.39]) or parents (mean difference = 2.2, p = .15, SMD = 0.15 [95% CI -0.05 to 0.33]), but effects emerged at the 30-day follow-up. No serious adverse events were reported.

Discussion: The cognitive-behavioral intervention was effective in reducing emotional symptoms in children and adolescents in Brazil. This intervention holds promise for enhancing access to mental health care within a stepped-care model in public health contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Health
Journal of Adolescent Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.90%
发文量
526
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescent Health is a scientific publication dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults. Our Journal covers a broad range of research topics, spanning from the basic biological and behavioral sciences to public health and policy. We welcome a variety of contributions, including original research papers, concise reports, literature reviews, clinical case reports, opinion pieces, and letters to the editor. We encourage professionals from diverse disciplines such as Anthropology, Education, Ethics, Global Health, Health Services Research, Law, Medicine, Mental and Behavioral Health, Nursing, Nutrition, Psychology, Public Health and Policy, Social Work, Sociology, and Youth Development to share their expertise and contribute to our mission of promoting adolescent health. Moreover, we value the voices of young individuals, family and community members, and healthcare professionals, and encourage them to submit poetry, personal narratives, images, and other creative works that provide unique insights into the experiences of adolescents and young adults. By combining scientific peer-reviewed research with creative expressions, our Journal aims to create a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in adolescent and young adult health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信