尊严与人权——本科护生尊严概念与操作的调查结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70194
Sheila Douglas, Leah Macaden, Kevin Muirhead, Elaine Webster, Liz Ellis
{"title":"尊严与人权——本科护生尊严概念与操作的调查结果。","authors":"Sheila Douglas, Leah Macaden, Kevin Muirhead, Elaine Webster, Liz Ellis","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore how students conceptualise and operationalise dignity with confidence in practice through a human rights lens.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quantitative study using an online survey questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected using an online survey with 33 questions in three parts: students' conceptualisation of dignity, understanding of human rights and human rights law; students' operationalisation of dignity using a case study designed for this purpose [a fictional character named John]; lastly, students' preferred approaches to dignity education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey findings revealed students' ambiguity or lack of agreement around dignity being associated with human rights and person-centred care. There was a sense of students feeling disempowered or lacking confidence in responding to dignity breaches in care, whilst some participants felt equipped to challenge this by most usually referring to clinical staff such as mentors and charge nurses due to the hierarchy in nursing systems within clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informed by the findings from this survey, the research team has developed DigniSpace (2024), the first online interactive space for Dignity Education co-produced with students focusing on the concept of dignity (through a consideration of human rights) that has been designed to help students learn more about the concept and to confidently promote and advocate dignity in practice. This is the first such resource to empower students to interrogate the concept of Dignity using the human rights lens and become change agents to promote and advocate dignity in care as a fundamental human right in any practice context.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Findings and outputs from this research have used the context of nursing education as a critical opportunity by placing students at the heart of developing DigniSpace (2024) to support the sustainable development of a culture of confidence to provide person-centred care embedded with dignity.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contributions: </strong>Findings from this first phase of the study were presented to our project advisory group that included experts with lived experience and their family care partners, who then participated in the co-design workshops in the second phase of the study to develop DigniSpace-a key output from this project.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 4","pages":"e70194"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dignity and Human Rights-Survey Findings on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Conceptualisation and Operationalisation of Dignity.\",\"authors\":\"Sheila Douglas, Leah Macaden, Kevin Muirhead, Elaine Webster, Liz Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore how students conceptualise and operationalise dignity with confidence in practice through a human rights lens.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quantitative study using an online survey questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected using an online survey with 33 questions in three parts: students' conceptualisation of dignity, understanding of human rights and human rights law; students' operationalisation of dignity using a case study designed for this purpose [a fictional character named John]; lastly, students' preferred approaches to dignity education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey findings revealed students' ambiguity or lack of agreement around dignity being associated with human rights and person-centred care. There was a sense of students feeling disempowered or lacking confidence in responding to dignity breaches in care, whilst some participants felt equipped to challenge this by most usually referring to clinical staff such as mentors and charge nurses due to the hierarchy in nursing systems within clinical contexts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informed by the findings from this survey, the research team has developed DigniSpace (2024), the first online interactive space for Dignity Education co-produced with students focusing on the concept of dignity (through a consideration of human rights) that has been designed to help students learn more about the concept and to confidently promote and advocate dignity in practice. This is the first such resource to empower students to interrogate the concept of Dignity using the human rights lens and become change agents to promote and advocate dignity in care as a fundamental human right in any practice context.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>Findings and outputs from this research have used the context of nursing education as a critical opportunity by placing students at the heart of developing DigniSpace (2024) to support the sustainable development of a culture of confidence to provide person-centred care embedded with dignity.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contributions: </strong>Findings from this first phase of the study were presented to our project advisory group that included experts with lived experience and their family care partners, who then participated in the co-design workshops in the second phase of the study to develop DigniSpace-a key output from this project.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"e70194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961373/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70194\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项研究的目的是探索学生如何通过人权的视角在实践中充满信心地概念化和操作尊严。设计:采用在线调查问卷进行定量研究。方法:采用在线问卷调查方式收集数据,共设33个问题,分为三个部分:学生对尊严的概念、对人权和人权法的理解;学生对尊严的操作化使用了一个为此目的而设计的案例研究[一个名叫约翰的虚构人物];最后,学生对尊严教育的偏好。结果:调查结果显示,学生对尊严与人权和以人为本的关怀之间的关系不明确或缺乏共识。有一种感觉,学生们在应对护理中的尊严侵犯时感到被剥夺了权力或缺乏信心,而一些参与者认为,由于临床环境中护理系统的等级制度,他们最有可能通过咨询导师和主管护士等临床工作人员来挑战这一点。结论:根据本次调查的结果,研究小组开发了DigniSpace(2024),这是尊严教育的第一个在线互动空间,与学生共同制作,重点关注尊严的概念(通过对人权的考虑),旨在帮助学生更多地了解这一概念,并在实践中自信地促进和倡导尊严。这是第一个这样的资源,使学生能够从人权的角度来审视尊严的概念,并成为变革的推动者,在任何实践背景下促进和倡导护理中的尊严作为一项基本人权。对护理的影响:本研究的结果和产出利用护理教育的背景作为一个关键机会,将学生置于发展尊严空间(2024)的核心,以支持自信文化的可持续发展,提供以人为本的嵌入尊严的护理。患者或公众贡献:研究第一阶段的研究结果提交给了我们的项目顾问组,该顾问组包括有生活经验的专家及其家庭护理伙伴,他们随后参加了研究第二阶段的共同设计研讨会,以开发dignispace,这是该项目的关键成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dignity and Human Rights-Survey Findings on Undergraduate Nursing Students' Conceptualisation and Operationalisation of Dignity.

Aim: The aim of the study was to explore how students conceptualise and operationalise dignity with confidence in practice through a human rights lens.

Design: A quantitative study using an online survey questionnaire.

Methods: Data were collected using an online survey with 33 questions in three parts: students' conceptualisation of dignity, understanding of human rights and human rights law; students' operationalisation of dignity using a case study designed for this purpose [a fictional character named John]; lastly, students' preferred approaches to dignity education.

Results: Survey findings revealed students' ambiguity or lack of agreement around dignity being associated with human rights and person-centred care. There was a sense of students feeling disempowered or lacking confidence in responding to dignity breaches in care, whilst some participants felt equipped to challenge this by most usually referring to clinical staff such as mentors and charge nurses due to the hierarchy in nursing systems within clinical contexts.

Conclusion: Informed by the findings from this survey, the research team has developed DigniSpace (2024), the first online interactive space for Dignity Education co-produced with students focusing on the concept of dignity (through a consideration of human rights) that has been designed to help students learn more about the concept and to confidently promote and advocate dignity in practice. This is the first such resource to empower students to interrogate the concept of Dignity using the human rights lens and become change agents to promote and advocate dignity in care as a fundamental human right in any practice context.

Implications for nursing: Findings and outputs from this research have used the context of nursing education as a critical opportunity by placing students at the heart of developing DigniSpace (2024) to support the sustainable development of a culture of confidence to provide person-centred care embedded with dignity.

Patient or public contributions: Findings from this first phase of the study were presented to our project advisory group that included experts with lived experience and their family care partners, who then participated in the co-design workshops in the second phase of the study to develop DigniSpace-a key output from this project.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信