低、高、中危非肌浸润性膀胱癌对卡介苗-谷氨酰胺和吉西他滨-多西他赛治疗的差异反应

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Ahmed Eraky, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Brenda Hug, Reuben Ben-David, Kyrollis Attalla, Nikhil Waingankar, Peter Wiklund, Reza Mehrazin, John P Sfakianos
{"title":"低、高、中危非肌浸润性膀胱癌对卡介苗-谷氨酰胺和吉西他滨-多西他赛治疗的差异反应","authors":"Ahmed Eraky, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Brenda Hug, Reuben Ben-David, Kyrollis Attalla, Nikhil Waingankar, Peter Wiklund, Reza Mehrazin, John P Sfakianos","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) is a potential alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intermediate-risk NMIBC group (IR-NMIBC) includes both low-grade (LG) and high-grade tumors (HG). This study investigates the response of HG and LG IR-NMIBC to Gem/Doce compared to BCG therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with IR-NMIBC who received either BCG or Gem/Doce between 2013 and 2023. Maintenance regimens were administered to patients without recurrence after induction for 1 year. Follow-up cystoscopies were performed per American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 505 NMIBC patients, 150 were IR-NMIBC: 115 with HG tumors (69 received BCG, 46 received Gem/Doce) and 35 with LG tumors (14 received BCG, 21 received Gem/Doce).With a median follow-up time of 31 months (Interquartile Range [IQR] 13-54), The overall 2-year any-grade RFS was 55%. For HG and LG groups, the 2-year any-grade RFS was 58% and 35% (P = 0.009), respectively. High-grade RFS at 2 years was 75% for HG and 94% for LG (P = 0.065). The 2-year PFS was similar between groups, at 96% for both HG and LG (P = 0.39). In HG patients, 2-year high-grade RFS was higher with BCG than Gem/Doce (81% vs. 59%, P = 0.008). In LG patients, 2-year any-grade and high-grade RFS were comparable between BCG and Gem/Doce (P = 0.067 and P = 0.37, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that BCG may offer a superior benefit in terms of high-grade RFS for HG IR-NMIBC compared to Gem/Doce, while LG tumors respond similarly to both treatments. This emphasizes the role of risk stratification in treatment selection. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential response of low- and high-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer to bacillus Calmette-Guérin and gemcitabine-docetaxel therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Eraky, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Brenda Hug, Reuben Ben-David, Kyrollis Attalla, Nikhil Waingankar, Peter Wiklund, Reza Mehrazin, John P Sfakianos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) is a potential alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intermediate-risk NMIBC group (IR-NMIBC) includes both low-grade (LG) and high-grade tumors (HG). This study investigates the response of HG and LG IR-NMIBC to Gem/Doce compared to BCG therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with IR-NMIBC who received either BCG or Gem/Doce between 2013 and 2023. Maintenance regimens were administered to patients without recurrence after induction for 1 year. Follow-up cystoscopies were performed per American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 505 NMIBC patients, 150 were IR-NMIBC: 115 with HG tumors (69 received BCG, 46 received Gem/Doce) and 35 with LG tumors (14 received BCG, 21 received Gem/Doce).With a median follow-up time of 31 months (Interquartile Range [IQR] 13-54), The overall 2-year any-grade RFS was 55%. For HG and LG groups, the 2-year any-grade RFS was 58% and 35% (P = 0.009), respectively. High-grade RFS at 2 years was 75% for HG and 94% for LG (P = 0.065). The 2-year PFS was similar between groups, at 96% for both HG and LG (P = 0.39). In HG patients, 2-year high-grade RFS was higher with BCG than Gem/Doce (81% vs. 59%, P = 0.008). In LG patients, 2-year any-grade and high-grade RFS were comparable between BCG and Gem/Doce (P = 0.067 and P = 0.37, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that BCG may offer a superior benefit in terms of high-grade RFS for HG IR-NMIBC compared to Gem/Doce, while LG tumors respond similarly to both treatments. This emphasizes the role of risk stratification in treatment selection. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:序贯膀胱内注射吉西他滨/多西他赛(Gem/Doce)是治疗非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的潜在替代方案。中危NMIBC组(IR-NMIBC)包括低级别肿瘤(LG)和高级别肿瘤(HG)。本研究探讨HG和LG IR-NMIBC对Gem/Doce的反应,并与BCG治疗进行比较。方法:我们纳入了2013年至2023年间接受BCG或Gem/Doce治疗的IR-NMIBC患者。对诱导后无复发的患者给予维持方案1年。按照美国泌尿学协会(AUA)指南进行随访膀胱镜检查。Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析评估无复发生存期(RFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。结果:505例NMIBC患者中,150例为IR-NMIBC; HG肿瘤115例(69例接受BCG, 46例接受Gem/Doce), LG肿瘤35例(14例接受BCG, 21例接受Gem/Doce)。中位随访时间为31个月(四分位间距[IQR] 13-54),总体2年任意级别RFS为55%。HG组和LG组2年任意分级RFS分别为58%和35% (P = 0.009)。HG患者2年高级别RFS为75%,LG患者为94% (P = 0.065)。两组间的2年PFS相似,HG和LG均为96% (P = 0.39)。在HG患者中,卡介苗组的2年高级别RFS高于Gem/Doce组(81% vs。59%, P = 0.008)。在LG患者中,BCG和Gem/Doce的2年任意级别和高级别RFS具有可比性(P = 0.067和P = 0.37)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与Gem/Doce相比,BCG可能在HG IR-NMIBC的高级别RFS方面提供优越的益处,而LG肿瘤对两种治疗的反应相似。这强调了风险分层在治疗选择中的作用。需要前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并完善治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential response of low- and high-grade intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer to bacillus Calmette-Guérin and gemcitabine-docetaxel therapy.

Background and objective: Sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) is a potential alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for treating non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Intermediate-risk NMIBC group (IR-NMIBC) includes both low-grade (LG) and high-grade tumors (HG). This study investigates the response of HG and LG IR-NMIBC to Gem/Doce compared to BCG therapy.

Methods: We included patients with IR-NMIBC who received either BCG or Gem/Doce between 2013 and 2023. Maintenance regimens were administered to patients without recurrence after induction for 1 year. Follow-up cystoscopies were performed per American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: Among 505 NMIBC patients, 150 were IR-NMIBC: 115 with HG tumors (69 received BCG, 46 received Gem/Doce) and 35 with LG tumors (14 received BCG, 21 received Gem/Doce).With a median follow-up time of 31 months (Interquartile Range [IQR] 13-54), The overall 2-year any-grade RFS was 55%. For HG and LG groups, the 2-year any-grade RFS was 58% and 35% (P = 0.009), respectively. High-grade RFS at 2 years was 75% for HG and 94% for LG (P = 0.065). The 2-year PFS was similar between groups, at 96% for both HG and LG (P = 0.39). In HG patients, 2-year high-grade RFS was higher with BCG than Gem/Doce (81% vs. 59%, P = 0.008). In LG patients, 2-year any-grade and high-grade RFS were comparable between BCG and Gem/Doce (P = 0.067 and P = 0.37, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that BCG may offer a superior benefit in terms of high-grade RFS for HG IR-NMIBC compared to Gem/Doce, while LG tumors respond similarly to both treatments. This emphasizes the role of risk stratification in treatment selection. Prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信