基于智能手机的表面形貌应用程序可准确检测临床显著的脊柱侧凸。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Matthew S Rohde, Marleni Albarran, Anthony A Catanzano, Elizabeth J Sachs, Hiba Naz, Amishi Jobanputra, Jacob Ribet, Kali Tileston, John S Vorhies
{"title":"基于智能手机的表面形貌应用程序可准确检测临床显著的脊柱侧凸。","authors":"Matthew S Rohde, Marleni Albarran, Anthony A Catanzano, Elizabeth J Sachs, Hiba Naz, Amishi Jobanputra, Jacob Ribet, Kali Tileston, John S Vorhies","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01062-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to validate the predictive capabilities of the Scoliosis Assessment App using ST technology against X-ray \"ground truth\" in patients being evaluated for clinically significant scoliosis; and (2) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the App versus the commonly used scoliometer tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, prospective validation study was conducted among patients with known or suspected scoliosis. The App determined an Asymmetry Index to predict the likelihood of clinically significant disease (MCM ≥ 20°) as determined by X-ray. Outcomes included the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) associated with the Apps prediction of clinically significant disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients were evaluated with a mean age of 13.6 ± 2.1 years. The App correctly classified 91% (50/55) of the patients compared to 69% (38/55) for the scoliometer. The sensitivity of the App was 96.4% (89.6-100% CI) versus 50% (28.1-71.9% CI) for the scoliometer (P < 0.05), while the specificity values were 85.2% (71.8-98.9% CI) and 88.9% (74.4-100% CI), respectively. ROC analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in accuracy (AUC) in favor of the App (95% versus 71%; P = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Scoliosis Assessment App using ST technology offers an accurate, accessible, and non-ionizing method of detecting clinically significant scoliosis, suggesting that the App can be used for detection and monitoring as an alternative to radiography and as a replacement for scoliometer without diminishing the standard of care. Further studies are required to assess variations of sensitivity in a large cohort of patients and clinical utility as an alternative to radiographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartphone-based surface topography app accurately detects clinically significant scoliosis.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew S Rohde, Marleni Albarran, Anthony A Catanzano, Elizabeth J Sachs, Hiba Naz, Amishi Jobanputra, Jacob Ribet, Kali Tileston, John S Vorhies\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01062-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to validate the predictive capabilities of the Scoliosis Assessment App using ST technology against X-ray \\\"ground truth\\\" in patients being evaluated for clinically significant scoliosis; and (2) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the App versus the commonly used scoliometer tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, prospective validation study was conducted among patients with known or suspected scoliosis. The App determined an Asymmetry Index to predict the likelihood of clinically significant disease (MCM ≥ 20°) as determined by X-ray. Outcomes included the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) associated with the Apps prediction of clinically significant disease.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five patients were evaluated with a mean age of 13.6 ± 2.1 years. The App correctly classified 91% (50/55) of the patients compared to 69% (38/55) for the scoliometer. The sensitivity of the App was 96.4% (89.6-100% CI) versus 50% (28.1-71.9% CI) for the scoliometer (P < 0.05), while the specificity values were 85.2% (71.8-98.9% CI) and 88.9% (74.4-100% CI), respectively. ROC analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in accuracy (AUC) in favor of the App (95% versus 71%; P = 0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Scoliosis Assessment App using ST technology offers an accurate, accessible, and non-ionizing method of detecting clinically significant scoliosis, suggesting that the App can be used for detection and monitoring as an alternative to radiography and as a replacement for scoliometer without diminishing the standard of care. Further studies are required to assess variations of sensitivity in a large cohort of patients and clinical utility as an alternative to radiographs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01062-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01062-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的有两个:(1)验证脊柱侧凸评估应用程序使用ST技术对临床显著性脊柱侧凸评估患者的x射线“基础真相”的预测能力;(2)比较App与常用脊柱侧弯测量工具的诊断准确性。方法:对已知或疑似脊柱侧凸的患者进行多中心前瞻性验证研究。应用程序确定了不对称指数,以预测x射线确定的临床显著疾病(MCM≥20°)的可能性。结果包括与Apps预测临床显著性疾病相关的敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC AUC)。结果:55例患者被评估,平均年龄13.6±2.1岁。应用程序对91%(50/55)的患者进行了正确分类,而脊柱侧弯计的这一比例为69%(38/55)。应用程序的灵敏度为96.4% (89.6-100% CI),而脊柱侧凸计的灵敏度为50% (28.1-71.9% CI) (P结论:采用ST技术的脊柱侧凸评估应用程序提供了一种准确、可及且非电离的检测临床显著性脊柱侧凸的方法,表明应用程序可用于检测和监测,作为x线摄影的替代方法,也可作为脊柱侧凸计的替代品,而不会降低护理标准。需要进一步的研究来评估在大量患者队列中的敏感性变化以及作为x线摄影替代方法的临床效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Smartphone-based surface topography app accurately detects clinically significant scoliosis.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to validate the predictive capabilities of the Scoliosis Assessment App using ST technology against X-ray "ground truth" in patients being evaluated for clinically significant scoliosis; and (2) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the App versus the commonly used scoliometer tool.

Methods: A multicenter, prospective validation study was conducted among patients with known or suspected scoliosis. The App determined an Asymmetry Index to predict the likelihood of clinically significant disease (MCM ≥ 20°) as determined by X-ray. Outcomes included the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) associated with the Apps prediction of clinically significant disease.

Results: Fifty-five patients were evaluated with a mean age of 13.6 ± 2.1 years. The App correctly classified 91% (50/55) of the patients compared to 69% (38/55) for the scoliometer. The sensitivity of the App was 96.4% (89.6-100% CI) versus 50% (28.1-71.9% CI) for the scoliometer (P < 0.05), while the specificity values were 85.2% (71.8-98.9% CI) and 88.9% (74.4-100% CI), respectively. ROC analysis indicated a statistically significant difference in accuracy (AUC) in favor of the App (95% versus 71%; P = 0.015).

Conclusion: The Scoliosis Assessment App using ST technology offers an accurate, accessible, and non-ionizing method of detecting clinically significant scoliosis, suggesting that the App can be used for detection and monitoring as an alternative to radiography and as a replacement for scoliometer without diminishing the standard of care. Further studies are required to assess variations of sensitivity in a large cohort of patients and clinical utility as an alternative to radiographs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信