骨质疏松药物在美国和加拿大的长期使用情况。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Kaleen N Hayes, Andrew R Zullo, Sarah D Berry, Arman Oganisian, Sulbh Aggarwal, Michael Adegboye, Suzanne M Cadarette
{"title":"骨质疏松药物在美国和加拿大的长期使用情况。","authors":"Kaleen N Hayes, Andrew R Zullo, Sarah D Berry, Arman Oganisian, Sulbh Aggarwal, Michael Adegboye, Suzanne M Cadarette","doi":"10.1007/s00198-025-07484-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over 12 years in the US and 26 years in Ontario, Canada, we found major differences in osteoporosis medications used. In both countries, osteoporosis medication initiation has not returned to pre-2008 levels; however, denosumab use is increasing. Future work should determine whether targeted screening or undertreatment drives these trends.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concerns about adverse events caused a rapid decline in osteoporosis medication use globally between 2008 and 2012. Trends in use in recent years have not been described. We aimed to describe and compare trends over time in the initiation and overall use of osteoporosis medications among older adults in the US and Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study leveraging two data sources: healthcare administrative data for all older adult residents of Ontario, Canada (ON) and Medicare claims and enrollment data for a 20% random sample of beneficiaries (US). We included community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 66 years at their first dispensing of an osteoporosis medication between 05/01/1996-12/31/2022 in ON and 01/01/2008-12/31/2020 in the US. We described and compared the number of incident and prevalent users of osteoporosis medications annually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 771,025 (average age = 75.2 years; 78% female) individuals in ON and 424,995 (average age = 75.3 years; 85% female) in the US initiating osteoporosis medications. In the US, alendronate and denosumab were the most common therapies, while in ON, risedronate and denosumab were most common. New use of osteoporosis medications dropped more between 2008 and 2011 in the US versus ON (58% vs. 29% relative decrease). Initiation of osteoporosis medications did not rebound to pre-2008 levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New use of osteoporosis medications remains below pre-2008 levels, and differs between the US and Canada. Future research should aim to understand drivers of decreased use, like changes in the screening strategy used for initial treatment or persisting concerns about adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteoporosis medication use over time in the United States and Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Kaleen N Hayes, Andrew R Zullo, Sarah D Berry, Arman Oganisian, Sulbh Aggarwal, Michael Adegboye, Suzanne M Cadarette\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00198-025-07484-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Over 12 years in the US and 26 years in Ontario, Canada, we found major differences in osteoporosis medications used. In both countries, osteoporosis medication initiation has not returned to pre-2008 levels; however, denosumab use is increasing. Future work should determine whether targeted screening or undertreatment drives these trends.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Concerns about adverse events caused a rapid decline in osteoporosis medication use globally between 2008 and 2012. Trends in use in recent years have not been described. We aimed to describe and compare trends over time in the initiation and overall use of osteoporosis medications among older adults in the US and Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a serial cross-sectional study leveraging two data sources: healthcare administrative data for all older adult residents of Ontario, Canada (ON) and Medicare claims and enrollment data for a 20% random sample of beneficiaries (US). We included community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 66 years at their first dispensing of an osteoporosis medication between 05/01/1996-12/31/2022 in ON and 01/01/2008-12/31/2020 in the US. We described and compared the number of incident and prevalent users of osteoporosis medications annually.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 771,025 (average age = 75.2 years; 78% female) individuals in ON and 424,995 (average age = 75.3 years; 85% female) in the US initiating osteoporosis medications. In the US, alendronate and denosumab were the most common therapies, while in ON, risedronate and denosumab were most common. New use of osteoporosis medications dropped more between 2008 and 2011 in the US versus ON (58% vs. 29% relative decrease). Initiation of osteoporosis medications did not rebound to pre-2008 levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>New use of osteoporosis medications remains below pre-2008 levels, and differs between the US and Canada. Future research should aim to understand drivers of decreased use, like changes in the screening strategy used for initial treatment or persisting concerns about adverse effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoporosis International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07484-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-025-07484-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国的12年和加拿大安大略省的26年里,我们发现了骨质疏松症药物使用的主要差异。在这两个国家,骨质疏松症药物的起始治疗尚未恢复到2008年前的水平;然而,denosumab的使用正在增加。未来的工作应确定是否有针对性的筛查或治疗不足推动了这些趋势。目的:对不良事件的担忧导致2008年至2012年间全球骨质疏松症药物使用迅速下降。近年来的使用趋势没有被描述。我们的目的是描述和比较美国和加拿大安大略省老年人开始和总体使用骨质疏松药物的趋势。方法:我们利用两个数据来源进行了一项连续横断面研究:加拿大安大略省(ON)所有老年居民的医疗保健管理数据和20%随机抽样受益人的医疗保险索赔和登记数据(美国)。我们纳入了1996年5月1日至2022年12月31日在英国和2008年1月1日至2020年12月31日在美国首次分配骨质疏松药物时年龄≥66岁的社区居住老年人。我们描述并比较了每年骨质疏松症药物的发生率和流行率。结果:我们确定了771,025例(平均年龄= 75.2岁;78%的女性)和424,995人(平均年龄= 75.3岁;85%的女性)开始服用骨质疏松药物。在美国,阿仑膦酸钠和地诺单抗是最常见的治疗方法,而在英国,利塞膦酸钠和地诺单抗是最常见的治疗方法。2008年至2011年间,美国新使用的骨质疏松药物比英国下降更多(58%对29%)。骨质疏松药物的使用没有恢复到2008年前的水平。结论:新使用的骨质疏松药物仍低于2008年前的水平,并且在美国和加拿大之间有所不同。未来的研究应旨在了解减少使用的驱动因素,如用于初始治疗的筛查策略的变化或对不良反应的持续担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Osteoporosis medication use over time in the United States and Canada.

Over 12 years in the US and 26 years in Ontario, Canada, we found major differences in osteoporosis medications used. In both countries, osteoporosis medication initiation has not returned to pre-2008 levels; however, denosumab use is increasing. Future work should determine whether targeted screening or undertreatment drives these trends.

Purpose: Concerns about adverse events caused a rapid decline in osteoporosis medication use globally between 2008 and 2012. Trends in use in recent years have not been described. We aimed to describe and compare trends over time in the initiation and overall use of osteoporosis medications among older adults in the US and Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study leveraging two data sources: healthcare administrative data for all older adult residents of Ontario, Canada (ON) and Medicare claims and enrollment data for a 20% random sample of beneficiaries (US). We included community-dwelling older adults aged ≥ 66 years at their first dispensing of an osteoporosis medication between 05/01/1996-12/31/2022 in ON and 01/01/2008-12/31/2020 in the US. We described and compared the number of incident and prevalent users of osteoporosis medications annually.

Results: We identified 771,025 (average age = 75.2 years; 78% female) individuals in ON and 424,995 (average age = 75.3 years; 85% female) in the US initiating osteoporosis medications. In the US, alendronate and denosumab were the most common therapies, while in ON, risedronate and denosumab were most common. New use of osteoporosis medications dropped more between 2008 and 2011 in the US versus ON (58% vs. 29% relative decrease). Initiation of osteoporosis medications did not rebound to pre-2008 levels.

Conclusion: New use of osteoporosis medications remains below pre-2008 levels, and differs between the US and Canada. Future research should aim to understand drivers of decreased use, like changes in the screening strategy used for initial treatment or persisting concerns about adverse effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信