中心水平的差异与MELD 35及以上患者不同的等待名单死亡率和肝移植概率相关。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Andrew Melehy, Dominic Amara, Shreya Gumate, Samer Ebaid, Fady M Kaldas, Douglas G Farmer, Alex A T Bui, Vatche G Agopian
{"title":"中心水平的差异与MELD 35及以上患者不同的等待名单死亡率和肝移植概率相关。","authors":"Andrew Melehy, Dominic Amara, Shreya Gumate, Samer Ebaid, Fady M Kaldas, Douglas G Farmer, Alex A T Bui, Vatche G Agopian","doi":"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplant (LT) centers may have variations in their approach to high-acuity (MELD ≥35) candidates for listing and transplantation. We investigated center-specific differences in waitlist outcomes, probability of LT, and post-LT survival in MELD ≥35 patients. Adult LT candidates (MELD ≥35) were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 01/01/10-04/01/22. Waitlist mortality was modelled with center as a random effect. Centers were grouped based on the random effect coefficient, with the highest tertile representing the highest risk group (comprised of centers with the highest risk of waitlist mortality attributable to center). Cumulative incidence of death/delisting, probability of LT, and 1-year post-LT survival were compared, with patients stratified by a listing MELD ≥35 or increase to MELD ≥35 after listing. In patients who increased to MELD ≥35, the 1-year cumulative incidence of death/delisting was highest (50%) and probability of transplant lowest (46%) in the high-risk group, compared to the low-risk group (37% and 55%, p<0.001 for both comparisons). For patients receiving an LT, post-transplant survival did not differ among the groups, though high-risk centers transplanted far less high-acuity patients. These variations may indicate that certain centers are associated with substantially decreased waitlist mortality for the highest acuity patients without corresponding decreases in post-transplant survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":18072,"journal":{"name":"Liver Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Center-Level variations are associated with disparate waitlist mortality and probability of liver transplant in MELD 35 and greater patients.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Melehy, Dominic Amara, Shreya Gumate, Samer Ebaid, Fady M Kaldas, Douglas G Farmer, Alex A T Bui, Vatche G Agopian\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/LVT.0000000000000616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Liver transplant (LT) centers may have variations in their approach to high-acuity (MELD ≥35) candidates for listing and transplantation. We investigated center-specific differences in waitlist outcomes, probability of LT, and post-LT survival in MELD ≥35 patients. Adult LT candidates (MELD ≥35) were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 01/01/10-04/01/22. Waitlist mortality was modelled with center as a random effect. Centers were grouped based on the random effect coefficient, with the highest tertile representing the highest risk group (comprised of centers with the highest risk of waitlist mortality attributable to center). Cumulative incidence of death/delisting, probability of LT, and 1-year post-LT survival were compared, with patients stratified by a listing MELD ≥35 or increase to MELD ≥35 after listing. In patients who increased to MELD ≥35, the 1-year cumulative incidence of death/delisting was highest (50%) and probability of transplant lowest (46%) in the high-risk group, compared to the low-risk group (37% and 55%, p<0.001 for both comparisons). For patients receiving an LT, post-transplant survival did not differ among the groups, though high-risk centers transplanted far less high-acuity patients. These variations may indicate that certain centers are associated with substantially decreased waitlist mortality for the highest acuity patients without corresponding decreases in post-transplant survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000616\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000616","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝移植(LT)中心对高敏锐度(MELD≥35)的候选患者进行上市和移植的方法可能会有所不同。我们调查了MELD≥35例患者在等待名单结果、LT概率和LT后生存方面的中心特异性差异。成人肝移植候选者(MELD≥35)从移植受者科学登记中心(01/01/10-04/01/22)中确定。候补名单死亡率以中心为随机效应建模。根据随机效应系数对中心进行分组,最高的五位数代表最高的风险组(由可归因于中心的等候名单死亡率风险最高的中心组成)。将患者按MELD≥35或MELD≥35进行分层,比较累计死亡/退市发生率、LT概率和LT后1年生存率。在MELD≥35的患者中,与低危组(37%和55%)相比,高危组的1年累计死亡/退市发生率最高(50%),移植概率最低(46%)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Center-Level variations are associated with disparate waitlist mortality and probability of liver transplant in MELD 35 and greater patients.

Liver transplant (LT) centers may have variations in their approach to high-acuity (MELD ≥35) candidates for listing and transplantation. We investigated center-specific differences in waitlist outcomes, probability of LT, and post-LT survival in MELD ≥35 patients. Adult LT candidates (MELD ≥35) were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 01/01/10-04/01/22. Waitlist mortality was modelled with center as a random effect. Centers were grouped based on the random effect coefficient, with the highest tertile representing the highest risk group (comprised of centers with the highest risk of waitlist mortality attributable to center). Cumulative incidence of death/delisting, probability of LT, and 1-year post-LT survival were compared, with patients stratified by a listing MELD ≥35 or increase to MELD ≥35 after listing. In patients who increased to MELD ≥35, the 1-year cumulative incidence of death/delisting was highest (50%) and probability of transplant lowest (46%) in the high-risk group, compared to the low-risk group (37% and 55%, p<0.001 for both comparisons). For patients receiving an LT, post-transplant survival did not differ among the groups, though high-risk centers transplanted far less high-acuity patients. These variations may indicate that certain centers are associated with substantially decreased waitlist mortality for the highest acuity patients without corresponding decreases in post-transplant survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Since the first application of liver transplantation in a clinical situation was reported more than twenty years ago, there has been a great deal of growth in this field and more is anticipated. As an official publication of the AASLD, Liver Transplantation delivers current, peer-reviewed articles on liver transplantation, liver surgery, and chronic liver disease — the information necessary to keep abreast of this evolving specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信