基于app的身体活动干预对既往高血压妊娠障碍妇女的影响:一项随机临床试验

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lili L Kókai, Diarmaid Ó Ceallaigh, Anne I Wijtzes, Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep, Johannes J Duvekot, Martin S Hagger, John Cawley, Alex Burdorf, Kirsten I M Rohde, Hans van Kippersluis
{"title":"基于app的身体活动干预对既往高血压妊娠障碍妇女的影响:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Lili L Kókai, Diarmaid Ó Ceallaigh, Anne I Wijtzes, Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep, Johannes J Duvekot, Martin S Hagger, John Cawley, Alex Burdorf, Kirsten I M Rohde, Hans van Kippersluis","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Insufficient moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Effective interventions are needed to bridge the intention-behavior gap and increase MVPA, especially among women with prior hypertensive pregnancy disorder (HPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the effectiveness of two 8-week app-based MVPA interventions (motivation and action) that were based on the integrated behavior change (IBC) model and used evidence-based behavior change techniques from behavioral sciences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included women with prior HPD. A purpose-built app was tested from October 2021 to March 2022, with follow-up immediately after the intervention (week 9), 3 months later (week 21), and 12 months later (week 61). The study ended in May 2023. Data were analyzed from March 31, 2022, to June 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>All participants received a wearable fitness tracker and a purpose-built physical activity intervention app and were randomized to 1 of 3 groups (control, motivation, or action): The control group received information on CVD, MVPA, and HPD; the motivation group received the same information as well as motivational interviewing-based counseling; and the action group received the same information as well as behavior change techniques that targeted all processes in the IBC model (motivational, volitional, automatic): motivational interviewing-based counseling, action and coping planning, commitment, positive psychology, and mindfulness-based stress reduction.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was MVPA (in minutes per week). Treatment effects were estimated using available case ordinary least-squares regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 619 women participated in this study: 205 in the control group, 209 in the motivation group, and 205 in the action group. Their mean (SD) age was 38.9 (7.3) years; 386 of 577 participants (67%) had a bachelor's degree or more and 550 of 577 (95%) were living with a child or children. The mean (SD) weekly MVPA for all 3 groups went from a high baseline of 242 (190) minutes to 197 (208) minutes immediately post intervention. No significant postintervention treatment effects on MVPA were observed for the action group (week 9 treatment effect, -17 [95% CI, -58 to 23] min/wk) or the motivation group (week 9 treatment effect, -3 [95% CI, -58 to 51] min/wk), despite the action intervention positively influencing motivational and volitional processes. The app and intervention components were all evaluated positively by participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this clinical trial of 2 app-based MVPA interventions among 619 women with prior HPD, no treatment effects on MVPA were observed. Possible explanations include (1) the importance of automatic processes in determining MVPA and the absence of treatment effects on these processes and (2) the high baseline activity levels of control group participants, which may have given less room for the treatments to improve upon. These are important considerations for those designing future MVPA interventions and RCTs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NL9329.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e252656"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"App-Based Physical Activity Intervention Among Women With Prior Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lili L Kókai, Diarmaid Ó Ceallaigh, Anne I Wijtzes, Jeanine E Roeters van Lennep, Johannes J Duvekot, Martin S Hagger, John Cawley, Alex Burdorf, Kirsten I M Rohde, Hans van Kippersluis\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Insufficient moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Effective interventions are needed to bridge the intention-behavior gap and increase MVPA, especially among women with prior hypertensive pregnancy disorder (HPD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test the effectiveness of two 8-week app-based MVPA interventions (motivation and action) that were based on the integrated behavior change (IBC) model and used evidence-based behavior change techniques from behavioral sciences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included women with prior HPD. A purpose-built app was tested from October 2021 to March 2022, with follow-up immediately after the intervention (week 9), 3 months later (week 21), and 12 months later (week 61). The study ended in May 2023. Data were analyzed from March 31, 2022, to June 9, 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>All participants received a wearable fitness tracker and a purpose-built physical activity intervention app and were randomized to 1 of 3 groups (control, motivation, or action): The control group received information on CVD, MVPA, and HPD; the motivation group received the same information as well as motivational interviewing-based counseling; and the action group received the same information as well as behavior change techniques that targeted all processes in the IBC model (motivational, volitional, automatic): motivational interviewing-based counseling, action and coping planning, commitment, positive psychology, and mindfulness-based stress reduction.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was MVPA (in minutes per week). Treatment effects were estimated using available case ordinary least-squares regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 619 women participated in this study: 205 in the control group, 209 in the motivation group, and 205 in the action group. Their mean (SD) age was 38.9 (7.3) years; 386 of 577 participants (67%) had a bachelor's degree or more and 550 of 577 (95%) were living with a child or children. The mean (SD) weekly MVPA for all 3 groups went from a high baseline of 242 (190) minutes to 197 (208) minutes immediately post intervention. No significant postintervention treatment effects on MVPA were observed for the action group (week 9 treatment effect, -17 [95% CI, -58 to 23] min/wk) or the motivation group (week 9 treatment effect, -3 [95% CI, -58 to 51] min/wk), despite the action intervention positively influencing motivational and volitional processes. The app and intervention components were all evaluated positively by participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this clinical trial of 2 app-based MVPA interventions among 619 women with prior HPD, no treatment effects on MVPA were observed. Possible explanations include (1) the importance of automatic processes in determining MVPA and the absence of treatment effects on these processes and (2) the high baseline activity levels of control group participants, which may have given less room for the treatments to improve upon. These are important considerations for those designing future MVPA interventions and RCTs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NL9329.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"e252656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966332/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2656\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2656","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:缺乏中度到剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)是心血管疾病(CVD)的一个危险因素。需要有效的干预措施来弥合意图-行为差距,增加MVPA,特别是在既往有高血压妊娠障碍(HPD)的妇女中。目的:测试基于综合行为改变(IBC)模型和基于行为科学的循证行为改变技术的两种8周基于app的MVPA干预(动机和行动)的有效性。设计、环境和参与者:该随机临床试验(RCT)包括既往患有HPD的女性。从2021年10月到2022年3月,对一个专门设计的应用程序进行了测试,并在干预后(第9周)、3个月后(第21周)和12个月后(第61周)立即进行了随访。该研究于2023年5月结束。数据分析时间为2022年3月31日至2024年6月9日。干预:所有参与者都接受了可穿戴健身追踪器和专门设计的体育活动干预应用程序,并被随机分为3组(对照组、动机组或行动组):对照组接受CVD、MVPA和HPD的信息;动机组得到了相同的信息以及基于动机访谈的咨询;行动组收到了相同的信息,以及针对IBC模型中所有过程(动机,意志,自动)的行为改变技术:基于动机访谈的咨询,行动和应对计划,承诺,积极心理学,以及基于正念的减压。主要结局和测量方法:主要结局为MVPA(每周分钟数)。使用可用病例普通最小二乘回归估计治疗效果。结果:共有619名女性参与了本研究:对照组205名,动机组209名,行动组205名。平均(SD)年龄为38.9(7.3)岁;577名参与者中有386人(67%)拥有学士或以上学位,577名参与者中有550人(95%)与孩子一起生活。所有3组的平均(SD)每周MVPA在干预后立即从242(190)分钟的高基线上升到197(208)分钟。尽管行动干预积极影响动机和意志过程,但行动组(第9周治疗效果,-17 [95% CI, -58至23]分钟/周)或动机组(第9周治疗效果,-3 [95% CI, -58至51]分钟/周)未观察到干预后治疗对MVPA的显著影响。应用程序和干预组件都得到了参与者的积极评价。结论及相关性:在619名既往患有HPD的女性中,2种基于app的MVPA干预措施的临床试验中,未观察到对MVPA的治疗效果。可能的解释包括:(1)自动过程在确定MVPA方面的重要性,以及治疗对这些过程的影响不足;(2)对照组参与者的基线活动水平较高,这可能给治疗提供了较少的改进空间。这些都是设计未来MVPA干预措施和随机对照试验的重要考虑因素。试验注册:荷兰试验注册标识符:NL9329。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
App-Based Physical Activity Intervention Among Women With Prior Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Insufficient moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Effective interventions are needed to bridge the intention-behavior gap and increase MVPA, especially among women with prior hypertensive pregnancy disorder (HPD).

Objective: To test the effectiveness of two 8-week app-based MVPA interventions (motivation and action) that were based on the integrated behavior change (IBC) model and used evidence-based behavior change techniques from behavioral sciences.

Design, setting, and participants: This randomized clinical trial (RCT) included women with prior HPD. A purpose-built app was tested from October 2021 to March 2022, with follow-up immediately after the intervention (week 9), 3 months later (week 21), and 12 months later (week 61). The study ended in May 2023. Data were analyzed from March 31, 2022, to June 9, 2024.

Intervention: All participants received a wearable fitness tracker and a purpose-built physical activity intervention app and were randomized to 1 of 3 groups (control, motivation, or action): The control group received information on CVD, MVPA, and HPD; the motivation group received the same information as well as motivational interviewing-based counseling; and the action group received the same information as well as behavior change techniques that targeted all processes in the IBC model (motivational, volitional, automatic): motivational interviewing-based counseling, action and coping planning, commitment, positive psychology, and mindfulness-based stress reduction.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was MVPA (in minutes per week). Treatment effects were estimated using available case ordinary least-squares regression.

Results: A total of 619 women participated in this study: 205 in the control group, 209 in the motivation group, and 205 in the action group. Their mean (SD) age was 38.9 (7.3) years; 386 of 577 participants (67%) had a bachelor's degree or more and 550 of 577 (95%) were living with a child or children. The mean (SD) weekly MVPA for all 3 groups went from a high baseline of 242 (190) minutes to 197 (208) minutes immediately post intervention. No significant postintervention treatment effects on MVPA were observed for the action group (week 9 treatment effect, -17 [95% CI, -58 to 23] min/wk) or the motivation group (week 9 treatment effect, -3 [95% CI, -58 to 51] min/wk), despite the action intervention positively influencing motivational and volitional processes. The app and intervention components were all evaluated positively by participants.

Conclusions and relevance: In this clinical trial of 2 app-based MVPA interventions among 619 women with prior HPD, no treatment effects on MVPA were observed. Possible explanations include (1) the importance of automatic processes in determining MVPA and the absence of treatment effects on these processes and (2) the high baseline activity levels of control group participants, which may have given less room for the treatments to improve upon. These are important considerations for those designing future MVPA interventions and RCTs.

Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NL9329.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信