{"title":"BreastWatch：一个Varian Eclipse脚本工具，用于基于社区的乳房治疗计划的自动评估。","authors":"Stefano Agostinelli, Daniele Zefiro, Stefania Garelli, Francesca Cavagnetto, Marco Gusinu, Monica Bevegni, Gladys Blandino, Alessandra Fozza, Fabrizio Levrero","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work introduces BreastWatch, a Varian Eclipse script tool designed to help medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation oncologists easily inspect and improve External Beam Breast Treatment (EBBT) plans using automatic evaluation of protocol dose-constraints enhanced by a Community-Based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BreastWatch examines Eclipse EBBT Plans and Plan Sums, automatically testing the plan's DVH against built-in international EBBT protocol (NRG RTOG1005, ICR Fast-Forward, ICR FAST, and EUROPA 1.2) dose-constraints. Results are displayed using traffic lights and an overall BW-SCORE. To overcome protocol dose-constraints limitations, the script can export plan data and dose values in CSV format to build a Community-Based Plan Library. These data are automatically read back in BreastWatch to check plans against the statistical distribution of similar Community plans and compute a CB-SCORE, which complements the protocol-based BW-SCORE. In this paper, BreastWatch v.1.6.5.0 script's design and strengths are examined and discussed, after extensive testing with more than 800 EBBT plans by six experienced planners. In a preliminary analysis, the usefulness of the CB approach is investigated by examining the chronological series of two dose-constraints values (Contra-Lung V3Gy and Heart Average Dose) before and after its introduction in BreastWatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found BreastWatch to speed up the EBBT planning process, while at the same time helping to improve the treatment plans in terms of PTVs coverage and uniformity, sparing of OARs, consistency, and robustness among different planners. The preliminary analysis of the chronological series of two dose-constraints values for a subgroup of 68 EBBT plans shows a trend (p-value = 0.07) for values to be improved and more consistent after the CB approach introduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BreastWatch script is a useful tool for the automatic evaluation of Eclipse EBBT plans. BreastWatch and its Community-Based features have been found to be a simple but effective automation approach to improve the EBBT planning process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BreastWatch: A Varian Eclipse script tool for Community-Based automatic evaluation of breast treatment plans.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Agostinelli, Daniele Zefiro, Stefania Garelli, Francesca Cavagnetto, Marco Gusinu, Monica Bevegni, Gladys Blandino, Alessandra Fozza, Fabrizio Levrero\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This work introduces BreastWatch, a Varian Eclipse script tool designed to help medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation oncologists easily inspect and improve External Beam Breast Treatment (EBBT) plans using automatic evaluation of protocol dose-constraints enhanced by a Community-Based approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BreastWatch examines Eclipse EBBT Plans and Plan Sums, automatically testing the plan's DVH against built-in international EBBT protocol (NRG RTOG1005, ICR Fast-Forward, ICR FAST, and EUROPA 1.2) dose-constraints. Results are displayed using traffic lights and an overall BW-SCORE. To overcome protocol dose-constraints limitations, the script can export plan data and dose values in CSV format to build a Community-Based Plan Library. These data are automatically read back in BreastWatch to check plans against the statistical distribution of similar Community plans and compute a CB-SCORE, which complements the protocol-based BW-SCORE. In this paper, BreastWatch v.1.6.5.0 script's design and strengths are examined and discussed, after extensive testing with more than 800 EBBT plans by six experienced planners. In a preliminary analysis, the usefulness of the CB approach is investigated by examining the chronological series of two dose-constraints values (Contra-Lung V3Gy and Heart Average Dose) before and after its introduction in BreastWatch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found BreastWatch to speed up the EBBT planning process, while at the same time helping to improve the treatment plans in terms of PTVs coverage and uniformity, sparing of OARs, consistency, and robustness among different planners. The preliminary analysis of the chronological series of two dose-constraints values for a subgroup of 68 EBBT plans shows a trend (p-value = 0.07) for values to be improved and more consistent after the CB approach introduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BreastWatch script is a useful tool for the automatic evaluation of Eclipse EBBT plans. BreastWatch and its Community-Based features have been found to be a simple but effective automation approach to improve the EBBT planning process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70080\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
BreastWatch: A Varian Eclipse script tool for Community-Based automatic evaluation of breast treatment plans.
Purpose: This work introduces BreastWatch, a Varian Eclipse script tool designed to help medical physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation oncologists easily inspect and improve External Beam Breast Treatment (EBBT) plans using automatic evaluation of protocol dose-constraints enhanced by a Community-Based approach.
Methods: BreastWatch examines Eclipse EBBT Plans and Plan Sums, automatically testing the plan's DVH against built-in international EBBT protocol (NRG RTOG1005, ICR Fast-Forward, ICR FAST, and EUROPA 1.2) dose-constraints. Results are displayed using traffic lights and an overall BW-SCORE. To overcome protocol dose-constraints limitations, the script can export plan data and dose values in CSV format to build a Community-Based Plan Library. These data are automatically read back in BreastWatch to check plans against the statistical distribution of similar Community plans and compute a CB-SCORE, which complements the protocol-based BW-SCORE. In this paper, BreastWatch v.1.6.5.0 script's design and strengths are examined and discussed, after extensive testing with more than 800 EBBT plans by six experienced planners. In a preliminary analysis, the usefulness of the CB approach is investigated by examining the chronological series of two dose-constraints values (Contra-Lung V3Gy and Heart Average Dose) before and after its introduction in BreastWatch.
Results: We found BreastWatch to speed up the EBBT planning process, while at the same time helping to improve the treatment plans in terms of PTVs coverage and uniformity, sparing of OARs, consistency, and robustness among different planners. The preliminary analysis of the chronological series of two dose-constraints values for a subgroup of 68 EBBT plans shows a trend (p-value = 0.07) for values to be improved and more consistent after the CB approach introduction.
Conclusions: The BreastWatch script is a useful tool for the automatic evaluation of Eclipse EBBT plans. BreastWatch and its Community-Based features have been found to be a simple but effective automation approach to improve the EBBT planning process.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
