区域化护理模式在治疗 Fournier 坏疽中的效果。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Sai Allu, Kamil Malshy, Borivoj Golijanin, Martus Gn, Emma Waddell, John Morgan, Benjamin Ahn, Amir Farah, Rebecca Ortiz, Raymond Che, Kennon Miller, Madeline Cancian
{"title":"区域化护理模式在治疗 Fournier 坏疽中的效果。","authors":"Sai Allu, Kamil Malshy, Borivoj Golijanin, Martus Gn, Emma Waddell, John Morgan, Benjamin Ahn, Amir Farah, Rebecca Ortiz, Raymond Che, Kennon Miller, Madeline Cancian","doi":"10.1177/00031348251331287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of transferring patients with Fournier's gangrene (FG) to a tertiary referral hospital (TRH) on survival and outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of FG cases treated at our TRH from January 2015 to January 2022. Clinicodemographic, laboratory, perioperative, and mortality data were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those directly presented (DP) to TRH and those transferred for treatment (TT) from other hospitals. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day, 180-day, 1-year and 2-year mortality. We employed chi-square, T-tests, and Fisher's exact tests for significance assessment. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier.Results136 patients (77.9% males) were analyzed: 66.9% in the TT group (n = 91), 33.1% in DP group (n = 45), with median ages of 59.2 and 56.4, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.06. Median transfer distance: 10.6 miles, travel time: 16 minutes. No significant differences were observed in time from presentation to initial debridement (8.45 hours for TT, 7.3 hours for DP, <i>P</i> = 0.57), comorbidities, or FG Severity Index. No significant differences in 30-day mortality (TT: 5.5%, DP: 4.4%, [HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.31, 7.57], <i>P</i> = 0.6), or other mortality rates (90-day: 7.7% vs 6.6%, 180-day: 14.3% vs 8.9%, 1-year: 18.7% vs 15.6%, 2-year: 20.9% vs 15.6%, <i>P</i> > 0.05). DP had a higher rate of fast door-to-operation room (<6 hours) than TT (46.7% vs 18.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.06), although 30-day mortality was not affected.ConclusionsTransfer of FG patients to a TRH was not associated with increased mortality. Due to the rarity and complexity of this disease, centralizing care might be the preferred approach in cases of regional primary presentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251331287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Regionalized Care Model in Treating Fournier's Gangrene.\",\"authors\":\"Sai Allu, Kamil Malshy, Borivoj Golijanin, Martus Gn, Emma Waddell, John Morgan, Benjamin Ahn, Amir Farah, Rebecca Ortiz, Raymond Che, Kennon Miller, Madeline Cancian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251331287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of transferring patients with Fournier's gangrene (FG) to a tertiary referral hospital (TRH) on survival and outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of FG cases treated at our TRH from January 2015 to January 2022. Clinicodemographic, laboratory, perioperative, and mortality data were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those directly presented (DP) to TRH and those transferred for treatment (TT) from other hospitals. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day, 180-day, 1-year and 2-year mortality. We employed chi-square, T-tests, and Fisher's exact tests for significance assessment. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier.Results136 patients (77.9% males) were analyzed: 66.9% in the TT group (n = 91), 33.1% in DP group (n = 45), with median ages of 59.2 and 56.4, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.06. Median transfer distance: 10.6 miles, travel time: 16 minutes. No significant differences were observed in time from presentation to initial debridement (8.45 hours for TT, 7.3 hours for DP, <i>P</i> = 0.57), comorbidities, or FG Severity Index. No significant differences in 30-day mortality (TT: 5.5%, DP: 4.4%, [HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.31, 7.57], <i>P</i> = 0.6), or other mortality rates (90-day: 7.7% vs 6.6%, 180-day: 14.3% vs 8.9%, 1-year: 18.7% vs 15.6%, 2-year: 20.9% vs 15.6%, <i>P</i> > 0.05). DP had a higher rate of fast door-to-operation room (<6 hours) than TT (46.7% vs 18.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.06), although 30-day mortality was not affected.ConclusionsTransfer of FG patients to a TRH was not associated with increased mortality. Due to the rarity and complexity of this disease, centralizing care might be the preferred approach in cases of regional primary presentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"31348251331287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251331287\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251331287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价富尼耶坏疽(FG)患者转诊至三级转诊医院(TRH)对患者生存和转归的影响。方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2022年1月在本院治疗的FG病例。收集临床人口学、实验室、围手术期和死亡率数据。患者分为两组:直接到TRH就诊的患者(DP)和从其他医院转诊的患者(TT)。主要终点为30天死亡率。次要结局包括90天、180天、1年和2年死亡率。我们采用卡方检验、t检验和Fisher精确检验进行显著性评估。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估生存率。结果136例患者中男性占77.9%,其中TT组为66.9% (n = 91), DP组为33.1% (n = 45),中位年龄分别为59.2岁和56.4岁,P = 0.06。中转距离中位数:10.6英里,行程时间:16分钟。从出现到首次清创的时间(TT为8.45小时,DP为7.3小时,P = 0.57)、合并症或FG严重程度指数均无显著差异。30天死亡率(TT: 5.5%, DP: 4.4%, [HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.31, 7.57], P = 0.6)或其他死亡率(90天死亡率:7.7% vs 6.6%, 180天死亡率:14.3% vs 8.9%, 1年死亡率:18.7% vs 15.6%, 2年死亡率:20.9% vs 15.6%, P < 0.05)无显著差异。DP患者快速开门至手术室的比率较高(P = 0.06),但30天死亡率不受影响。结论:FG患者转到TRH与死亡率增加无关。由于这种疾病的罕见性和复杂性,集中治疗可能是区域原发性病例的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of a Regionalized Care Model in Treating Fournier's Gangrene.

ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of transferring patients with Fournier's gangrene (FG) to a tertiary referral hospital (TRH) on survival and outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of FG cases treated at our TRH from January 2015 to January 2022. Clinicodemographic, laboratory, perioperative, and mortality data were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: those directly presented (DP) to TRH and those transferred for treatment (TT) from other hospitals. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day, 180-day, 1-year and 2-year mortality. We employed chi-square, T-tests, and Fisher's exact tests for significance assessment. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier.Results136 patients (77.9% males) were analyzed: 66.9% in the TT group (n = 91), 33.1% in DP group (n = 45), with median ages of 59.2 and 56.4, respectively, P = 0.06. Median transfer distance: 10.6 miles, travel time: 16 minutes. No significant differences were observed in time from presentation to initial debridement (8.45 hours for TT, 7.3 hours for DP, P = 0.57), comorbidities, or FG Severity Index. No significant differences in 30-day mortality (TT: 5.5%, DP: 4.4%, [HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.31, 7.57], P = 0.6), or other mortality rates (90-day: 7.7% vs 6.6%, 180-day: 14.3% vs 8.9%, 1-year: 18.7% vs 15.6%, 2-year: 20.9% vs 15.6%, P > 0.05). DP had a higher rate of fast door-to-operation room (<6 hours) than TT (46.7% vs 18.7%, P = 0.06), although 30-day mortality was not affected.ConclusionsTransfer of FG patients to a TRH was not associated with increased mortality. Due to the rarity and complexity of this disease, centralizing care might be the preferred approach in cases of regional primary presentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信